New Year Sale 2026! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

APMG-International Better-Business-Cases-Practitioner Exam - Topic 1 Question 35 Discussion

Actual exam question for APMG-International's Better-Business-Cases-Practitioner exam
Question #: 35
Topic #: 1
[All Better-Business-Cases-Practitioner Questions]

The best and final offers have been returned for the delivery of the new campus. The preferred supplier was Piaffeco, which was

the same supplier that delivered the neighbouring Marshgate High School.

Should Economic Appraisals be prepared for the best and final offers for the discarded service providers on the short list?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: B

by Norah at Nov 20, 2025, 08:35 PM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium Better-Business-Cases-Practitioner Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Submit Cancel
Beckie
3 days ago
Yes, all options should be considered for transparency.
upvoted 0 times
...
Emiko
8 days ago
Wait, why would we do appraisals for rejected options?
upvoted 0 times
...
Felicidad
14 days ago
Totally agree, no need for extra appraisals!
upvoted 0 times
...
Minna
19 days ago
I think we only need to update the PSC.
upvoted 0 times
...
Haley
24 days ago
Hmm, I wonder if they considered hiring Pinocchio as the supplier. He's great with wood!
upvoted 0 times
...
Nell
29 days ago
I hope the final decision doesn't come down to a coin flip!
upvoted 0 times
...
Ling
1 month ago
D) Yes, because the FBC should provide Economic Appraisals for all options.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ammie
1 month ago
C) Yes, because the reasons for rejecting potential service providers from the long list to the short list stage should be provided.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tanja
1 month ago
I recall that the FBC should cover all options, so option D seems reasonable, but I’m not entirely confident about the specifics.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lashawn
2 months ago
I feel like we should provide reasons for rejecting the other service providers, which makes me think option C could be the right choice.
upvoted 0 times
...
Paulina
2 months ago
I'm confident the answer is C. We need to justify why we rejected the other potential providers, so preparing economic appraisals for them is important, even if they weren't selected.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kizzy
2 months ago
Okay, I'm leaning towards B. The question says the best and final offers have been returned, so I think updating the FBC with those should be part of the commercial case, not the economic appraisals.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jamey
2 months ago
I think the key here is that the question is asking about the economic appraisals, not just the commercial case. So I'd go with D - the FBC should provide economic appraisals for all options, not just the preferred one.
upvoted 0 times
...
Evangelina
3 months ago
I think we practiced a similar question where updating the FBC was emphasized, so I might lean towards option B.
upvoted 0 times
...
Francoise
3 months ago
But we need to justify why others were rejected!
upvoted 0 times
...
Laila
3 months ago
I remember discussing the importance of the public sector comparator, but I'm not sure if it means we shouldn't prepare Economic Appraisals for the discarded options.
upvoted 0 times
...
Cora
3 months ago
Hmm, I'm a bit confused on this one. I thought the FBC only needed to be updated with the best and final offer, not the other options. But I could be wrong, I'll have to think this through more.
upvoted 0 times
...
Roslyn
3 months ago
I'm pretty sure the answer is C. We need to provide the reasons for rejecting potential service providers, so we should prepare economic appraisals for the discarded options.
upvoted 0 times
Annabelle
2 months ago
I think C makes sense. We need transparency.
upvoted 0 times
...
...

Save Cancel