Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

APMG-International Better-Business-Cases-Practitioner Exam - Topic 1 Question 35 Discussion

The best and final offers have been returned for the delivery of the new campus. The preferred supplier was Piaffeco, which wasthe same supplier that delivered the neighbouring Marshgate High School.Should Economic Appraisals be prepared for the best and final offers for the discarded service providers on the short list?
B) No, because updating the FBC with best and final offers should be done as part of the Commercial Case.
A) No, because only the public sector comparator (PSC) should be updated in light of knowledge gained from the procurement.
C) Yes, because the reasons for rejecting potential service providers from the long list to the short list stage should be provided.
D) Yes, because the FBC should provide Economic Appraisals for all options.

APMG-International Better-Business-Cases-Practitioner Exam - Topic 1 Question 35 Discussion

Actual exam question for APMG-International's Better-Business-Cases-Practitioner exam
Question #: 35
Topic #: 1
[All Better-Business-Cases-Practitioner Questions]

The best and final offers have been returned for the delivery of the new campus. The preferred supplier was Piaffeco, which was

the same supplier that delivered the neighbouring Marshgate High School.

Should Economic Appraisals be prepared for the best and final offers for the discarded service providers on the short list?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: B

by Norah at Nov 20, 2025, 08:35 PM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium Better-Business-Cases-Practitioner Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Submit Cancel
Carmelina
2 months ago
Yes, transparency is key for all options.
upvoted 0 times
...
Shawna
2 months ago
Updating the FBC is enough, no need for all that.
upvoted 0 times
...
Glenna
2 months ago
No way, just update the PSC.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ellsworth
2 months ago
I agree, all options should be evaluated.
upvoted 0 times
...
Irving
2 months ago
I think we should prepare Economic Appraisals.
upvoted 0 times
...
Mona
3 months ago
Surprised that some think we shouldn't evaluate all offers!
upvoted 0 times
...
Beckie
3 months ago
Yes, all options should be considered for transparency.
upvoted 0 times
...
Emiko
3 months ago
Wait, why would we do appraisals for rejected options?
upvoted 0 times
...
Felicidad
4 months ago
Totally agree, no need for extra appraisals!
upvoted 0 times
...
Minna
4 months ago
I think we only need to update the PSC.
upvoted 0 times
...
Haley
4 months ago
Hmm, I wonder if they considered hiring Pinocchio as the supplier. He's great with wood!
upvoted 0 times
...
Nell
4 months ago
I hope the final decision doesn't come down to a coin flip!
upvoted 0 times
...
Ling
4 months ago
D) Yes, because the FBC should provide Economic Appraisals for all options.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ammie
4 months ago
C) Yes, because the reasons for rejecting potential service providers from the long list to the short list stage should be provided.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tanja
5 months ago
I recall that the FBC should cover all options, so option D seems reasonable, but I’m not entirely confident about the specifics.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lashawn
5 months ago
I feel like we should provide reasons for rejecting the other service providers, which makes me think option C could be the right choice.
upvoted 0 times
...
Paulina
5 months ago
I'm confident the answer is C. We need to justify why we rejected the other potential providers, so preparing economic appraisals for them is important, even if they weren't selected.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kizzy
5 months ago
Okay, I'm leaning towards B. The question says the best and final offers have been returned, so I think updating the FBC with those should be part of the commercial case, not the economic appraisals.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jamey
6 months ago
I think the key here is that the question is asking about the economic appraisals, not just the commercial case. So I'd go with D - the FBC should provide economic appraisals for all options, not just the preferred one.
upvoted 0 times
...
Evangelina
6 months ago
I think we practiced a similar question where updating the FBC was emphasized, so I might lean towards option B.
upvoted 0 times
...
Francoise
6 months ago
But we need to justify why others were rejected!
upvoted 0 times
...
Laila
6 months ago
I remember discussing the importance of the public sector comparator, but I'm not sure if it means we shouldn't prepare Economic Appraisals for the discarded options.
upvoted 0 times
...
Cora
6 months ago
Hmm, I'm a bit confused on this one. I thought the FBC only needed to be updated with the best and final offer, not the other options. But I could be wrong, I'll have to think this through more.
upvoted 0 times
...
Roslyn
7 months ago
I'm pretty sure the answer is C. We need to provide the reasons for rejecting potential service providers, so we should prepare economic appraisals for the discarded options.
upvoted 0 times
Marya
1 month ago
C definitely covers our bases. Let's stick with that.
upvoted 0 times
...
Mariko
1 month ago
I still lean towards C. It's about accountability.
upvoted 0 times
...
Izetta
1 month ago
But what about option A? Updating the PSC seems crucial too.
upvoted 0 times
...
Georgiana
2 months ago
Agreed, C is the way to go. Justify our choices.
upvoted 0 times
...
Annabelle
5 months ago
I think C makes sense. We need transparency.
upvoted 0 times
...
...

Save Cancel