Discuss APICS CTSC Exam Topic 1 Question 31

A firm wants to update its supply chain network design to enable auto re-sizing based on changes in product flow within the network. This update will place the firm at what stage in the Capability

Maturity Model within Supply Network Design?

AAdvanced

BTypical

CAd-hoc

DLeading

Suggested Answer: A

According to the CTSC Learning System, one of the factors that affects the distribution costs is the cost of implementing the new materials flow network, which includes the costs of designing, building, and operating the network of warehouses, distribution centers, and transportation modes1. The cost of implementing the new materials flow network can be significant and should be included in the calculation of the total cost of ownership (TCO) of the distribution system1. The other factors listed in the question are not directly related to the distribution costs, but rather to the inventory costs, which are a separate component of the TCO1.

Get Premium CTSC Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF Real Exam Format Detailed Explanations Instant Access Get Your Practice Test

34 comments · newest first

Rutha 10 months ago

Agreed, this is a game changer for supply chains!

Terry 11 months ago

Auto re-sizing? Sounds too good to be true!

Adelina 11 months ago

Leading sounds right, but Advanced is a close call.

Raylene 11 months ago

I think it's more Typical, honestly.

Antione 11 months ago

Definitely at the Advanced stage!

Carmela 12 months ago

I'm a bit confused about the stages. I thought Ad-hoc was more about basic processes, but I'm not sure if this update qualifies for something higher.

Julio 12 months ago

I remember discussing the Capability Maturity Model, and I think auto re-sizing might fit into Typical, but it could also be seen as Advanced.

Stephaine 12 months ago

This reminds me of a practice question we did on supply chain stages. I feel like it could be Leading, but I need to double-check the definitions.

Leah 1 year ago

I think the auto re-sizing feature suggests a higher level of maturity, maybe Advanced? But I'm not entirely sure.

Marvel 1 year ago

Hmm, I'm a bit confused. I know the Capability Maturity Model has different stages, but I'm not totally clear on what defines each one. I'll need to review my notes to make sure I understand the differences before answering this.

Maybelle 1 year ago

This seems straightforward to me. Enabling auto re-sizing is a clear sign that the firm is moving towards a more mature, responsive supply chain network. I'd go with A, Advanced.

Colene 1 year ago

I'm a little unsure about this one. The question mentions "enabling auto re-sizing", but I'm not sure if that automatically means they're at the Advanced stage. Let me re-read the answer choices carefully.

Terrilyn 1 year ago

Okay, I think I've got this. If the firm is enabling auto re-sizing based on changes in product flow, that sounds like they're moving towards a more advanced, adaptive supply chain network. So I'd say the answer is A, Advanced.

Jennie 1 year ago

Hmm, this seems like a tricky one. I'll need to think through the different stages of the Capability Maturity Model and how they relate to the firm's supply chain network design update.

Annice 1 year ago

I'm torn between 'Advanced' and 'Leading'. But since it's 'auto re-sizing', I'm gonna have to go with 'Leading'. Who needs a human to do that, am I right?

Corinne 1 year ago

↳ replying to Annice

Agreed, 'Leading' is the most advanced option for supply chain network design.

Kizzy 1 year ago

↳ replying to Annice

Definitely, 'Leading' is the way to go with auto re-sizing.

Yun 1 year ago

↳ replying to Annice

I think 'Leading' is the right choice. Automation is key.

Tiffiny 1 year ago

The 'Ad-hoc' stage? Really? That's like trying to fix a leaky faucet with chewing gum. This is clearly more advanced than that!

Roxane 1 year ago

↳ replying to Tiffiny

User 3: It's important for the firm to be proactive and stay ahead in the Capability Maturity Model.

Tanja 1 year ago

↳ replying to Tiffiny

User 2: Definitely, they should aim for a more advanced stage like 'Leading' or 'Advanced'.

Josphine 1 year ago

↳ replying to Tiffiny

User 1: I agree, the 'Ad-hoc' stage seems outdated for a firm looking to update its supply chain network design.

Annamae 1 year ago

I'm going with 'Advanced'. Updating the network design to be more dynamic is a big step up from the typical setup.

Tyra 1 year ago

↳ replying to Annamae

'Typical' might not be the best choice, as they are going beyond the usual approach with this update.

Delsie 1 year ago

↳ replying to Annamae

I think 'Leading' might also be a good option, since they are taking steps to stay ahead of the curve.

Billye 1 year ago

↳ replying to Annamae

I agree, 'Advanced' seems like the right choice. It shows the firm is proactive in adapting to changes.

Freeman 1 year ago

Hmm, this sounds like the 'Leading' stage to me. Automate the resizing? That's next-level supply chain management!

Princess 1 year ago

↳ replying to Freeman

Definitely, being able to auto resize based on changes is a key capability for a leading supply chain network design.

Alexis 1 year ago

↳ replying to Freeman

I think it's a great move for the firm to stay competitive in the market.

Tequila 1 year ago

↳ replying to Freeman

It shows that the firm is proactive in adapting to changes in product flow within the network.

Tabetha 1 year ago

↳ replying to Freeman

I agree, automating resizing is definitely a sign of being at the 'Leading' stage.

Latosha 2 years ago

I believe the firm is at the Leading stage, as they are implementing cutting-edge technology in their supply chain network design.

Edmond 2 years ago

I agree with Jacqueline, because auto re-sizing shows a high level of capability.

Jacqueline 2 years ago

I think the firm would be at the Advanced stage.

APICS CTSC Exam - Topic 1 Question 31 Discussion