Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

APICS CSCP Exam - Topic 2 Question 66 Discussion

Actual exam question for APICS's CSCP exam
Question #: 66
Topic #: 2
[All CSCP Questions]

Moving from engineer-to-order (ETO) to assembled-to-order (ATO) usually increases which of the following costs per unit?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: B

by Roxane at Mar 02, 2023, 07:54 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium CSCP Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Submit Cancel
Bok
6 months ago
Definitely not procurement, that should stay stable.
upvoted 0 times
...
Leigha
6 months ago
Surprised to hear that! I thought ATO would lower some costs.
upvoted 0 times
...
Cecily
6 months ago
I think manufacturing costs might go up too.
upvoted 0 times
...
Fallon
7 months ago
Totally agree, inventory management gets trickier!
upvoted 0 times
...
Odette
7 months ago
ATO usually increases inventory costs.
upvoted 0 times
...
Galen
7 months ago
I recall something about transportation costs being affected, but I can't remember if they go up or down with ATO.
upvoted 0 times
...
Elenore
7 months ago
I feel like manufacturing costs could go up too, but I'm leaning towards inventory being the main factor.
upvoted 0 times
...
Hannah
7 months ago
I'm not entirely sure, but I remember a practice question that mentioned procurement costs could rise with ATO due to needing more parts.
upvoted 0 times
...
Levi
7 months ago
I think moving to ATO might increase inventory costs since you need to keep more components on hand for assembly.
upvoted 0 times
...
Winifred
7 months ago
Hmm, this one seems straightforward. I'll carefully read through the options and think about which Object types can have Milestones added to them.
upvoted 0 times
...
Wynell
7 months ago
Okay, the key here is to improve high-availability and network reconvergence between the LAN-side BGP Networks and the hub Edges in New York. I think modifying the timers is the way to go, but I'll need to double-check the specifics.
upvoted 0 times
...
Marsha
7 months ago
From what I remember, safety stock can be applied to handle shortages, but I'm wondering if that's a long-term solution.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rusty
12 months ago
I'll have to go with B) Inventory. Holding more parts in stock is the name of the game in ATO. Just hope they don't expire before they get used!
upvoted 0 times
...
Casie
1 year ago
I'm going with B) Inventory. Increased holding costs are the price you pay for the flexibility of ATO. Gotta spend money to make money, right?
upvoted 0 times
Alonso
10 months ago
Transportation costs might also go up with ATO since you may need to ship more frequently. So A) Transportation could be a factor too.
upvoted 0 times
...
Joanna
11 months ago
I think C) Manufacturing costs could also increase when moving from ETO to ATO. More standardized processes may be needed.
upvoted 0 times
...
Harley
11 months ago
I agree, B) Inventory is the correct answer. Holding more inventory can definitely increase costs.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Rosenda
1 year ago
Ha! I bet the answer is D) Procurement. Now the company has to coordinate all those suppliers to get the right parts on time. Good luck with that!
upvoted 0 times
Eura
11 months ago
But maybe the decrease in Inventory costs would offset the increase in Procurement costs.
upvoted 0 times
...
Mariann
11 months ago
Yeah, coordinating all those suppliers can be a headache for sure.
upvoted 0 times
...
Scarlet
12 months ago
I think you're right, D) Procurement sounds like it would increase with the switch to ATO.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
King
1 year ago
Hmm, I'm not sure about this one. I'd guess C) Manufacturing, since ATO might require more automation and specialized equipment.
upvoted 0 times
Dan
10 months ago
Maybe it's a combination of all of them, depending on the specific situation.
upvoted 0 times
...
Elvis
10 months ago
That's a good point, but I still believe C) Manufacturing would see the biggest increase in costs.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lilli
11 months ago
I agree, but I also think D) Procurement could increase due to the need for more standardized parts.
upvoted 0 times
...
Frank
11 months ago
I think it might be B) Inventory, since ATO would require holding more finished goods.
upvoted 0 times
...
Christiane
11 months ago
Maybe it's a combination of all of them, depending on the specific situation.
upvoted 0 times
...
Joanna
11 months ago
That's a good point, but I still believe C) Manufacturing would see the biggest increase in costs.
upvoted 0 times
...
Sylvia
11 months ago
I agree, but I also think D) Procurement could increase due to the need for more standardized parts.
upvoted 0 times
...
Leanora
11 months ago
I think it might be B) Inventory, since ATO would require holding more finished goods.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rosendo
1 year ago
Yeah, that's a good point. ATO would probably require more specialized equipment.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ahmed
1 year ago
I think it might be C) Manufacturing too, makes sense with the automation.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Mitsue
1 year ago
I think the answer is B) Inventory. Transitioning from ETO to ATO typically means holding more components in stock, which increases inventory costs per unit.
upvoted 0 times
...
Paola
1 year ago
But wouldn't transportation costs also increase with ATO due to more frequent shipments?
upvoted 0 times
...
Kanisha
1 year ago
I agree with Dan, because with ATO, we need to hold more finished goods in stock.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dan
1 year ago
I think it's B) Inventory.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel