Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

APICS CPIM Exam - Topic 1 Question 100 Discussion

XYZ Company is pursuing improved quality levels. Which of the following actions would produce the best results for XYZ?
D) reduce process variability
A) Hire additional inspectors
B) tighten tolerances
C) adopt a quality first slogan

APICS CPIM Exam - Topic 1 Question 100 Discussion

Actual exam question for APICS's CPIM exam
Question #: 100
Topic #: 1
[All CPIM Questions]

XYZ Company is pursuing improved quality levels. Which of the following actions would produce the best results for XYZ?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: D

by Lashandra at Sep 18, 2024, 09:06 PM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium CPIM Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Submit Cancel
Starr
9 months ago
Process variability reduction has proven benefits in quality control.
upvoted 0 times
...
Becky
9 months ago
Wait, reducing process variability? Isn't that risky?
upvoted 0 times
...
Francine
9 months ago
I think adopting a slogan won't really change anything.
upvoted 0 times
...
Wilford
10 months ago
Tightening tolerances is definitely the way to go!
upvoted 0 times
...
Altha
10 months ago
Hiring more inspectors seems like a quick fix.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ty
10 months ago
Adopting a quality first slogan sounds nice, but I doubt it would have a significant impact without real changes in processes.
upvoted 0 times
...
Bambi
10 months ago
I feel like hiring additional inspectors could help, but it might not address the root causes of quality issues.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ma
10 months ago
Tightening tolerances might seem like a good idea, but I think it could actually increase costs and lead to more rejects.
upvoted 0 times
...
Angella
11 months ago
I remember we discussed how reducing process variability can lead to more consistent quality, but I'm not entirely sure if that's the best option here.
upvoted 0 times
...
Yan
11 months ago
A quality first slogan? That sounds like a waste of time to me. We need concrete actions, not just slogans. I'm leaning towards tightening tolerances or reducing variability as the best approaches.
upvoted 0 times
...
Karol
11 months ago
Hmm, I'm a bit unsure about this one. Hiring more inspectors could help catch more defects, but it doesn't really address the root cause. I'll need to think through the options carefully.
upvoted 0 times
...
Armando
11 months ago
This seems like a straightforward quality improvement question. I'd focus on the key actions that can directly impact quality, like tightening tolerances or reducing process variability.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kris
11 months ago
Reducing process variability is definitely the way to go here. That's the best way to consistently produce high-quality products. The other options seem more like band-aids rather than real solutions.
upvoted 0 times
...
Nell
11 months ago
Hmm, this seems like a tricky one. I'll need to carefully read through the options and think about which capabilities are actually supported by the Backup Exec Agent for Microsoft Exchange.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jesse
1 year ago
Ah, the age-old question of quality improvement - hire more inspectors, or just get the machines to work right in the first place? I say we go with option E: hire the inspectors to monitor the machines, and then give them all kazoos to play whenever they find a defect. That'll really boost morale!
upvoted 0 times
Teri
1 year ago
Maybe we can combine both approaches - hire inspectors to monitor and reduce process variability at the same time.
upvoted 0 times
...
Van
1 year ago
I agree, tightening tolerances could help prevent defects from occurring in the first place.
upvoted 0 times
...
Izetta
1 year ago
That's a creative idea! But I think reducing process variability would be more effective in the long run.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Mari
1 year ago
I'm not even going to dignify 'hire more inspectors' with a response. That's like trying to catch water with a net made of holes. Reduce that variability, and the quality will follow.
upvoted 0 times
...
Son
1 year ago
Reducing process variability is the clear winner here. It's like fine-tuning a Formula 1 car - the more consistent you can make the engine, the better it's going to perform.
upvoted 0 times
Valentine
1 year ago
Tightening tolerances could also help improve quality levels.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lavera
1 year ago
I agree, it will help ensure consistent quality in our products.
upvoted 0 times
...
Glory
1 year ago
Reducing process variability is definitely the way to go.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Theola
1 year ago
A quality first slogan? Seriously? That's like putting lipstick on a pig. If XYZ wants real results, they need to tighten those tolerances and get their processes under control.
upvoted 0 times
Dorothy
1 year ago
Hiring additional inspectors might not be as effective as focusing on process control.
upvoted 0 times
...
Therese
1 year ago
Reducing process variability would also help in achieving better results.
upvoted 0 times
...
Yuki
1 year ago
I agree, tightening tolerances is crucial for improving quality.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Tammara
1 year ago
Hiring more inspectors? That's like trying to extinguish a forest fire with a garden hose. Reducing process variability is the way to go - get to the root of the problem, not just slap a band-aid on it.
upvoted 0 times
Jaclyn
1 year ago
Adopting a quality first slogan is important for company culture.
upvoted 0 times
...
Georgiann
1 year ago
Tightening tolerances could help improve quality as well.
upvoted 0 times
...
Leonor
1 year ago
Hiring more inspectors won't solve the underlying issues.
upvoted 0 times
...
Milly
1 year ago
Reducing process variability is definitely the best option.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Jesus
1 year ago
But wouldn't tightening tolerances also help improve quality for XYZ?
upvoted 0 times
...
Charlie
1 year ago
I agree with Camellia, reducing process variability can lead to better quality.
upvoted 0 times
...
Camellia
1 year ago
I think reducing process variability would be the best option for XYZ.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel