Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

APICS CPIM Exam - Topic 1 Question 100 Discussion

Actual exam question for APICS's CPIM exam
Question #: 100
Topic #: 1
[All CPIM Questions]

XYZ Company is pursuing improved quality levels. Which of the following actions would produce the best results for XYZ?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: D

by Lashandra at Sep 18, 2024, 09:06 PM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium CPIM Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Submit Cancel
Starr
5 months ago
Process variability reduction has proven benefits in quality control.
upvoted 0 times
...
Becky
5 months ago
Wait, reducing process variability? Isn't that risky?
upvoted 0 times
...
Francine
6 months ago
I think adopting a slogan won't really change anything.
upvoted 0 times
...
Wilford
6 months ago
Tightening tolerances is definitely the way to go!
upvoted 0 times
...
Altha
6 months ago
Hiring more inspectors seems like a quick fix.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ty
6 months ago
Adopting a quality first slogan sounds nice, but I doubt it would have a significant impact without real changes in processes.
upvoted 0 times
...
Bambi
7 months ago
I feel like hiring additional inspectors could help, but it might not address the root causes of quality issues.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ma
7 months ago
Tightening tolerances might seem like a good idea, but I think it could actually increase costs and lead to more rejects.
upvoted 0 times
...
Angella
7 months ago
I remember we discussed how reducing process variability can lead to more consistent quality, but I'm not entirely sure if that's the best option here.
upvoted 0 times
...
Yan
7 months ago
A quality first slogan? That sounds like a waste of time to me. We need concrete actions, not just slogans. I'm leaning towards tightening tolerances or reducing variability as the best approaches.
upvoted 0 times
...
Karol
7 months ago
Hmm, I'm a bit unsure about this one. Hiring more inspectors could help catch more defects, but it doesn't really address the root cause. I'll need to think through the options carefully.
upvoted 0 times
...
Armando
7 months ago
This seems like a straightforward quality improvement question. I'd focus on the key actions that can directly impact quality, like tightening tolerances or reducing process variability.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kris
7 months ago
Reducing process variability is definitely the way to go here. That's the best way to consistently produce high-quality products. The other options seem more like band-aids rather than real solutions.
upvoted 0 times
...
Nell
7 months ago
Hmm, this seems like a tricky one. I'll need to carefully read through the options and think about which capabilities are actually supported by the Backup Exec Agent for Microsoft Exchange.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jesse
12 months ago
Ah, the age-old question of quality improvement - hire more inspectors, or just get the machines to work right in the first place? I say we go with option E: hire the inspectors to monitor the machines, and then give them all kazoos to play whenever they find a defect. That'll really boost morale!
upvoted 0 times
Teri
10 months ago
Maybe we can combine both approaches - hire inspectors to monitor and reduce process variability at the same time.
upvoted 0 times
...
Van
10 months ago
I agree, tightening tolerances could help prevent defects from occurring in the first place.
upvoted 0 times
...
Izetta
11 months ago
That's a creative idea! But I think reducing process variability would be more effective in the long run.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Mari
1 year ago
I'm not even going to dignify 'hire more inspectors' with a response. That's like trying to catch water with a net made of holes. Reduce that variability, and the quality will follow.
upvoted 0 times
...
Son
1 year ago
Reducing process variability is the clear winner here. It's like fine-tuning a Formula 1 car - the more consistent you can make the engine, the better it's going to perform.
upvoted 0 times
Valentine
11 months ago
Tightening tolerances could also help improve quality levels.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lavera
11 months ago
I agree, it will help ensure consistent quality in our products.
upvoted 0 times
...
Glory
12 months ago
Reducing process variability is definitely the way to go.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Theola
1 year ago
A quality first slogan? Seriously? That's like putting lipstick on a pig. If XYZ wants real results, they need to tighten those tolerances and get their processes under control.
upvoted 0 times
Dorothy
11 months ago
Hiring additional inspectors might not be as effective as focusing on process control.
upvoted 0 times
...
Therese
11 months ago
Reducing process variability would also help in achieving better results.
upvoted 0 times
...
Yuki
12 months ago
I agree, tightening tolerances is crucial for improving quality.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Tammara
1 year ago
Hiring more inspectors? That's like trying to extinguish a forest fire with a garden hose. Reducing process variability is the way to go - get to the root of the problem, not just slap a band-aid on it.
upvoted 0 times
Jaclyn
11 months ago
Adopting a quality first slogan is important for company culture.
upvoted 0 times
...
Georgiann
11 months ago
Tightening tolerances could help improve quality as well.
upvoted 0 times
...
Leonor
11 months ago
Hiring more inspectors won't solve the underlying issues.
upvoted 0 times
...
Milly
11 months ago
Reducing process variability is definitely the best option.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Jesus
1 year ago
But wouldn't tightening tolerances also help improve quality for XYZ?
upvoted 0 times
...
Charlie
1 year ago
I agree with Camellia, reducing process variability can lead to better quality.
upvoted 0 times
...
Camellia
1 year ago
I think reducing process variability would be the best option for XYZ.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel