Discuss APICS CPIM-Part-2 Exam Topic 5 Question 22

Which of the following approaches should first be considered as part of process improvement?

AHiring more skilled people to perform the job

BMaking better use of existing resources

CBuying better and faster equipment

DApplying stricter quality control

Suggested Answer: D

The poka-yoke technique of process design is a method for preventing or detecting errors and defects in the manufacturing process.Poka-yoke means ''mistake-proofing'' in Japanese, and it aims to eliminate human errors by creating systems that either make it impossible for a mistake to occur or make the mistake immediately obvious once it has occurred1.One way to implement poka-yoke is to use part attributes, which are physical features of a part that ensure it can only be assembled or used in the correct way2. For example, a part attribute can define the correct orientation of a part, such as a notch, a hole, a shape, or a color, so that it can only fit into the matching component. This prevents the operator from inserting the part incorrectly or using the wrong part.

The other options do not illustrate the poka-yoke technique of process design.Reducing the number of types of fasteners is an example of standardization, which is a method for simplifying and streamlining the production process by minimizing variation and complexity3.Customized containers that hold mixed sets of parts are an example of kitting, which is a method for organizing and delivering parts or materials to the point of use or consumption in the production process4.An andon is a visual or audible signal that indicates the status of a machine or process, such as normal, abnormal, or emergency5. An andon can be used to alert operators or supervisors of problems or issues, but it does not prevent or detect errors by itself.

Get Premium CPIM-Part-2 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF Real Exam Format Detailed Explanations Instant Access Get Your Practice Test

33 comments · newest first

Aliza 10 months ago

Definitely A or B, but I lean towards B for efficiency!

Alysa 11 months ago

Wait, why would stricter quality control be a first step? Seems odd.

Loreta 11 months ago

Buying better equipment sounds good, but it can be expensive.

Lezlie 11 months ago

Totally agree, hiring more skilled people isn't always the answer.

Shaquana 11 months ago

I think making better use of existing resources is key.

Francine 12 months ago

Buying better equipment could be effective, but it might not address the root of the problem. I lean towards improving existing resources.

Tawny 12 months ago

Hiring more skilled people sounds appealing, but I feel like we should optimize what we already have first.

Aretha 12 months ago

I'm not sure, but I remember a practice question that emphasized the importance of quality control. Maybe applying stricter quality control is a good option too?

Virgie 1 year ago

I think making better use of existing resources might be the best first step. It seems like a more sustainable approach.

Renea 1 year ago

I'm pretty confident that the answer is B. Optimizing the use of current resources is usually the most effective way to improve a process before considering other options.

Ronna 1 year ago

Okay, for process improvement, I'd say making better use of existing resources is probably the best first step. That seems like the most logical and practical approach.

Hyman 1 year ago

Hmm, I'm a bit unsure about this one. I'll need to think it through carefully to make sure I don't miss any important details.

Pamella 1 year ago

This seems like a straightforward process improvement question. I'd start by considering the options and thinking about which one would be the most cost-effective and efficient approach.

Susana 1 year ago

Hmm, this one seems pretty straightforward. I'm pretty sure the GPS sensor is the right answer here.

Shalon 1 year ago

Okay, I've got this. The key is recognizing that the question is asking about a change that is inseparable from a change in accounting estimate. That means option C is the correct answer - the effect should be reported as a component of income from continuing operations.

Isadora 1 year ago

This seems like a straightforward question about connectivity. I'll use my knowledge of the RTN 910A CSHR board to confidently select the correct answer.

Loreta 1 year ago

Better equipment, huh? I bet the janitor has a time machine they're not telling anyone about.

Sabine 1 year ago

↳ replying to Loreta

C) Buying better and faster equipment

Kimberlie 1 year ago

↳ replying to Loreta

B) Making better use of existing resources

Rhea 1 year ago

↳ replying to Loreta

A) Hiring more skilled people to perform the job

Chan 1 year ago

Hiring more skilled people? That's like throwing money at the problem. I'd rather see how I can get more out of the team I've got, you know?

Colton 1 year ago

Applying stricter quality control could be a good idea, but it feels a bit like putting a bandaid on a bigger issue. I'd start with the low-hanging fruit and optimize the process first.

Annice 2 years ago

Buying better and faster equipment sounds tempting, but it's not the first thing I'd consider. It's usually better to optimize what you have before investing in new gear.

Margarita 1 year ago

↳ replying to Annice

How can stricter quality control benefit process improvement?

Reiko 1 year ago

↳ replying to Annice

What are some ways to optimize existing resources?

Charlie 2 years ago

But what about buying better and faster equipment? Wouldn't that improve productivity?

Hillary 2 years ago

I think making better use of existing resources is the way to go. It's the most cost-effective approach and can yield significant improvements.

Marjory 1 year ago

↳ replying to Hillary

Hiring more skilled people can be beneficial, but it's important to maximize the potential of existing resources first.

Cristy 1 year ago

↳ replying to Hillary

Applying stricter quality control is important, but it may not be the first step in process improvement.

Patrick 1 year ago

↳ replying to Hillary

Buying better and faster equipment might be costly, so it's important to consider the most cost-effective approach first.

Callie 1 year ago

↳ replying to Hillary

I agree, utilizing existing resources efficiently can definitely lead to process improvement.

Enola 2 years ago

I agree with Denise. It's more cost-effective and efficient.

Denise 2 years ago

I think we should consider making better use of existing resources first.

APICS CPIM-Part-2 Exam - Topic 5 Question 22 Discussion