Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

APICS CPIM-MPR Exam - Topic 4 Question 91 Discussion

The resource profile approach to rough-cut capacity planning is desirable in the manufacture of parts with lengthy lead times because the approach:
A) uses detailed data about time standards for each product at the key resources.
B) assumes that all components are built in the same period as the end item.
C) considers the historical portion of the total plant time required.
D) time phases labor requirements.

APICS CPIM-MPR Exam - Topic 4 Question 91 Discussion

Actual exam question for APICS's CPIM-MPR exam
Question #: 91
Topic #: 4
[All CPIM-MPR Questions]

The resource profile approach to rough-cut capacity planning is desirable in the manufacture of parts with lengthy lead times because the approach:

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: A

by Louvenia at Jul 03, 2024, 04:00 PM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium CPIM-MPR Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Submit Cancel
Catina
7 months ago
I’m surprised this approach isn’t more widely used for long lead times!
upvoted 0 times
...
Gabriele
7 months ago
D is interesting, but I’m not sure it’s the main focus here.
upvoted 0 times
...
Onita
8 months ago
C sounds plausible, but how reliable is historical data really?
upvoted 0 times
...
Martina
8 months ago
I think B makes more sense, components need to sync with the end item.
upvoted 0 times
...
Arminda
8 months ago
A is definitely the right choice, detailed data is key!
upvoted 0 times
...
Maryann
8 months ago
I practiced a similar question where labor requirements were phased, so I’m leaning towards option D, but I need to think it through more.
upvoted 0 times
...
Marcos
9 months ago
I feel like option C could be relevant because it mentions historical time, but I’m not entirely confident.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ernie
9 months ago
I think it might be option A since it talks about detailed data, but I also recall something about historical data being important.
upvoted 0 times
...
Selma
9 months ago
I remember we discussed how the resource profile approach helps in managing lead times, but I'm not sure which option best describes that.
upvoted 0 times
...
Avery
9 months ago
The question is asking why the resource profile approach is desirable for parts with lengthy lead times, so I think the answer has to do with how this approach handles that situation specifically. I'm going to review the options again with that in mind.
upvoted 0 times
...
Shaquana
9 months ago
Okay, I think the key here is that the resource profile approach considers the detailed data on time standards for each product at the key resources. That seems like it would be useful for parts with long lead times.
upvoted 0 times
...
Katie
9 months ago
Hmm, the resource profile approach sounds like it might be related to the time phasing of labor requirements, but I'm not totally sure how that connects to the lengthy lead times mentioned in the question.
upvoted 0 times
...
Reynalda
9 months ago
This question seems straightforward, but I want to make sure I understand the key differences between the answer choices before selecting one.
upvoted 0 times
...
Miesha
9 months ago
I'm leaning towards option A. The detailed time standards data seems like it would be important for planning capacity when you have parts with lengthy lead times.
upvoted 0 times
...
Stephania
9 months ago
Okay, let me see. I think the answer is C, but I'm not 100% confident.
upvoted 0 times
...
Mariann
9 months ago
I think adding both authors to the workflow-users group could work, but I remember we also discussed the importance of what permissions they need.
upvoted 0 times
...
Theron
9 months ago
I remember a question that emphasized logistics systems in relation to demand management. I guess that might hint at option B being correct?
upvoted 0 times
...
Jin
1 year ago
Whoever wrote this question must have a rough-cut sense of humor. I'm going with A for a smooth-cut answer.
upvoted 0 times
...
Burma
1 year ago
B is a bit too simplistic, assuming all components are built simultaneously. Real-world is never that neat and tidy.
upvoted 0 times
Sherill
1 year ago
B is right, real-world manufacturing is more complex than assuming everything is built at the same time.
upvoted 0 times
...
Vannessa
1 year ago
C) considers the historical portion of the total plant time required.
upvoted 0 times
...
Leota
1 year ago
A) uses detailed data about time standards for each product at the key resources.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Vi
1 year ago
D sounds about right. Timing the labor requirements is key for effective rough-cut planning.
upvoted 0 times
Isaac
1 year ago
I agree, D helps in determining the labor needed at different phases of production.
upvoted 0 times
...
Karina
1 year ago
Yes, D is important for ensuring that labor is allocated properly during the planning process.
upvoted 0 times
...
Adolph
1 year ago
D sounds about right. Timing the labor requirements is key for effective rough-cut planning.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Mitzie
1 year ago
I'm leaning towards C, as the historical portion of plant time is crucial for capacity planning.
upvoted 0 times
Sabra
1 year ago
User4: I'm not sure, but C also makes sense since it considers the historical portion of the total plant time required.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lou
1 year ago
User3: I agree with User1, A seems to be the most logical choice for rough-cut capacity planning.
upvoted 0 times
...
Shawnda
1 year ago
User2: I see your point, but I believe D is more accurate as it time phases labor requirements.
upvoted 0 times
...
Raina
1 year ago
User1: I think A is the correct answer, as it uses detailed data about time standards for each product at the key resources.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Marcelle
1 year ago
Option A seems the most comprehensive, considering the detailed data required for each product.
upvoted 0 times
Paris
1 year ago
I agree, having detailed data for each product is crucial for effective capacity planning.
upvoted 0 times
...
Candida
1 year ago
Option A seems to be the most accurate in terms of planning for each product.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Kimbery
1 year ago
Yes, it uses detailed data about time standards for each product at the key resources.
upvoted 0 times
...
Odette
1 year ago
I agree, it helps in planning labor requirements more effectively.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kimbery
1 year ago
I think the resource profile approach is important for parts with lengthy lead times.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel