Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

APICS CPIM-BSP Exam - Topic 3 Question 103 Discussion

Which of the following production environment strategies requires unique design or significant customization?
D) Engineer-to-order
A) Make-to-order
B) Assemble-to-order
C) Make-to-stock

APICS CPIM-BSP Exam - Topic 3 Question 103 Discussion

Actual exam question for APICS's CPIM-BSP exam
Question #: 103
Topic #: 3
[All CPIM-BSP Questions]

Which of the following production environment strategies requires unique design or significant customization?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: D

by Nada at Nov 13, 2024, 11:05 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium CPIM-BSP Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Submit Cancel
Charlie
9 months ago
Totally agree, Engineer-to-order is the most complex!
upvoted 0 times
...
Lenita
9 months ago
Wait, is Make-to-stock really the easiest option?
upvoted 0 times
...
Lorrine
9 months ago
I thought Assemble-to-order was more flexible?
upvoted 0 times
...
Rosita
10 months ago
Make-to-order also requires unique designs.
upvoted 0 times
...
Adaline
10 months ago
Definitely Engineer-to-order needs a lot of customization!
upvoted 0 times
...
Daron
10 months ago
I feel like Make-to-stock is definitely not the answer since it’s more about producing for inventory rather than customization.
upvoted 0 times
...
Denae
10 months ago
I'm a bit confused about Assemble-to-order. Does it really need unique designs, or is it more about assembling from pre-made parts?
upvoted 0 times
...
Paris
10 months ago
I remember practicing a question like this, and I think Make-to-order also requires some customization, but maybe not as much as Engineer-to-order.
upvoted 0 times
...
Francine
11 months ago
I think the answer might be Engineer-to-order since it involves custom designs, but I'm not completely sure.
upvoted 0 times
...
Marylou
11 months ago
I feel pretty confident about this one. Engineer-to-order is the production strategy that involves the most customization, so that's the answer I'm going with.
upvoted 0 times
...
Providencia
11 months ago
I'm a little confused by the differences between all these options. I'll have to review my notes to make sure I understand them properly before answering.
upvoted 0 times
...
Chi
11 months ago
Okay, I've got this. Engineer-to-order is the one that requires the most unique design and customization, so that's my pick.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jimmie
11 months ago
Hmm, this is a tricky one. I'm not totally sure about the differences between all these production strategies. I'll have to think it through carefully.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jill
11 months ago
I think the key here is to focus on the unique design or customization aspect. Make-to-order and Engineer-to-order seem like the most likely options that would require that.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lindsey
1 year ago
Engineer-to-order - the option for those who want their products to be as unique as their personalities. 'Sorry, we don't have that in stock. But we can build you a one-of-a-kind time machine, if you'd like.'
upvoted 0 times
...
Annmarie
1 year ago
Engineer-to-order, huh? Sounds like the kind of thing where you start with a blank canvas and just wing it. 'Yeah, sure, we can make you a unicorn-powered hovercraft. No problem!'
upvoted 0 times
Brianne
1 year ago
It's definitely a unique design approach compared to the other production strategies.
upvoted 0 times
...
Sherly
1 year ago
Yeah, it's like creating something from scratch based on the customer's specific requirements.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ena
1 year ago
I think Engineer-to-order is definitely the most customized option.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Carisa
1 year ago
Engineer-to-order, no doubt about it. That's the one where you basically start from scratch for each product. Sounds like a lot of work, but I guess some customers want that level of customization.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lonny
1 year ago
I was a bit confused at first, but after thinking it through, Engineer-to-order makes the most sense. It's the only one that really needs unique design work.
upvoted 0 times
Brandon
1 year ago
Assemble-to-order falls somewhere in between customization and standardization.
upvoted 0 times
...
Odelia
1 year ago
Make-to-order and Make-to-stock are more standard processes.
upvoted 0 times
...
Anabel
1 year ago
I agree, Engineer-to-order definitely requires unique design work.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Lavera
1 year ago
Engineer-to-order definitely sounds like the most customized production strategy. The others seem more standardized or mass-produced.
upvoted 0 times
Terry
1 year ago
Make-to-stock is more about mass-producing goods in anticipation of customer demand.
upvoted 0 times
...
Veronika
1 year ago
Make-to-order and Assemble-to-order seem more standardized compared to Engineer-to-order.
upvoted 0 times
...
Malinda
1 year ago
I agree, Engineer-to-order definitely requires unique design or significant customization.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
German
1 year ago
I think Engineer-to-order is the correct answer here. It requires unique design and significant customization for each product, unlike the other options.
upvoted 0 times
Cristen
1 year ago
Yes, Make-to-order, Assemble-to-order, and Make-to-stock are more standard production strategies.
upvoted 0 times
...
Fernanda
1 year ago
I agree, Engineer-to-order definitely requires unique design and significant customization.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Lonna
1 year ago
I'm not sure, but I think A) Make-to-order also requires customization.
upvoted 0 times
...
Glory
1 year ago
I agree with Elmira. Engineer-to-order requires unique design.
upvoted 0 times
...
Elmira
1 year ago
I think it's D) Engineer-to-order.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel