Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

APICS CPIM-8.0 Exam - Topic 8 Question 3 Discussion

Posted by Catherin on Mar 07, 2025 at 03:11 AM

Which of the following systems would be the most cost-efficient for inventory management of a low value item?

Suggested Answer: C

Periodic review is a system that determines the order quantity and reorder point for an item based on the inventory position at fixed intervals. This system is suitable for inventory management of low value items, as it reduces the ordering and holding costs, simplifies the ordering process, and allows for grouping orders. Therefore, option C is correct. Option A is incorrect because order point is a system that triggers an order when the inventory level falls below a predetermined level. This system requires continuous monitoring of inventory levels, which may not be cost-efficient for low value items. Option B is incorrect because material requirements planning (MRP) is a system that calculates the requirements for components and materials based on the demand for end items. This system is more appropriate for items with dependent demand, rather than independent demand. Option D is incorrect because economic order quantity (EOQ) is a system that determines the optimal order quantity that minimizes the total ordering and holding costs. This system assumes constant and known demand and lead time, which may not be realistic for some items.Reference: CPIM Part 2 Exam Content Manual, Version 8.0, Section E: Plan and Manage Inventory, Subsection E.2: Inventory Management Methods, p. 53.


Get Premium CPIM-8.0 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF Real Exam Format Detailed Explanations Instant Access Get Your Practice Test
35 comments · newest first
AV
Avery 10 months ago
Not sure if EOQ is the best choice for everything, though.
RO
Rolland 11 months ago
Order point is super simple and cost-efficient too!
LE
Lezlie 11 months ago
Wait, isn't Periodic Review better for low value items?
AU
Audra 11 months ago
Totally agree, EOQ minimizes costs effectively!
LA
Lashawna 11 months ago
I think Economic Order Quantity (EOQ) is the way to go for low value items.
LO
Louann 12 months ago
I have a vague memory of the order point system being cost-efficient, but I need to double-check that.
LU
Luisa 12 months ago
I feel like MRP could be overkill for low value items, but I can't recall the specifics.
ST
Stanton 12 months ago
I remember practicing with EOQ questions, and it seems like it’s more suited for higher value items.
WI
Winifred 1 year ago
I think the periodic review system might be the best choice for low value items, but I'm not entirely sure.
MI
Miesha 1 year ago
I've got this! Order point is definitely the way to go for low-value inventory. It's the most straightforward and requires the least overhead. Periodic review could work too, but order point is the clear winner here in terms of cost efficiency.
JO
Josefa 1 year ago
Okay, let me see. For low-value items, I'd guess that a simpler system like order point or periodic review would be more cost-efficient than the more complex MRP or EOQ. But I'll double-check my understanding just to be sure.
CA
Carissa 1 year ago
Hmm, not sure about this one. I know there are different inventory management systems, but I'm a bit fuzzy on the details and tradeoffs. Might need to review my notes before answering.
MI
Mila 1 year ago
This seems like a straightforward operations management question. I'll think through the key factors for low-value inventory - cost efficiency is the main priority here.
CA
Carmela 2 years ago
I see your point, Dierdre. It really depends on the specific characteristics of the item being managed.
XU
Xuan 2 years ago
That's true, Periodic review could be more practical for items with low value and less demand variability.
GE
Gearldine 2 years ago
A classic case of 'keep it simple, stupid'. I'm going with C. Periodic review. No need to overthink it for low-value items.
VI
Viola 1 year ago
↳ replying to Gearldine
A: Exactly, why make it more complicated than it needs to be?
AV
Avery 1 year ago
↳ replying to Gearldine
B: Yeah, it's simple and cost-efficient. No need for anything too complicated.
MI
Miriam 1 year ago
↳ replying to Gearldine
A: I agree, periodic review is definitely the way to go for low-value items.
TA
Tamesha 1 year ago
↳ replying to Gearldine
Order point could work too, but periodic review seems like the simplest option.
LY
Lynna 2 years ago
↳ replying to Gearldine
I think economic order quantity (EOQ) might be too complex for low-value items.
MA
Magdalene 2 years ago
↳ replying to Gearldine
I agree, periodic review is definitely the way to go for low-value items.
MA
Maryann 2 years ago
Hmm, I'm torn between B and D. MRP or EOQ... Decisions, decisions. Maybe I should just ask the professor to toss a coin for me.
DI
Dierdre 2 years ago
But wouldn't Periodic review be more suitable for low value items?
CA
Carmela 2 years ago
I agree with Xuan, EOQ takes into account the holding cost and ordering cost.
LE
Lenna 2 years ago
D. Economic order quantity (EOQ) is the way to go. It might be a bit more complicated, but it'll optimize your inventory costs in the long run.
TA
Tawna 2 years ago
↳ replying to Lenna
D. Economic order quantity (EOQ) is the way to go. It might be a bit more complicated, but it'll optimize your inventory costs in the long run.
LE
Lenna 2 years ago
↳ replying to Lenna
D) Economic order quantity (EOQ)
TA
Tarra 2 years ago
↳ replying to Lenna
C) Periodic review
LO
Lourdes 2 years ago
↳ replying to Lenna
B) Material requirements planning (MRP)
RU
Ruby 2 years ago
↳ replying to Lenna
A) Order point
XU
Xuan 2 years ago
I think the most cost-efficient system would be Economic order quantity (EOQ).
TH
Theresia 2 years ago
I'd go with option C. Periodic review seems like the most cost-efficient for low-value items. You don't want to waste time and money on complex systems for cheap stuff, right?
NA
Natalie 2 years ago
↳ replying to Theresia
I think Economic order quantity (EOQ) would be more suitable for high-value items.
NA
Natalie 2 years ago
↳ replying to Theresia
I agree, periodic review is definitely the way to go for low-value items.
0/2000 characters

Save Cancel