Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

APICS CLTD Exam - Topic 6 Question 112 Discussion

What facility location method has the advantage of analyzing both quantitative data and hard-to-evaluate criteria'?
B) Factor rating
A) Center-of-gravity
C) Location and break-even analysis
D) Least-cost-per-lane

APICS CLTD Exam - Topic 6 Question 112 Discussion

Actual exam question for APICS's CLTD exam
Question #: 112
Topic #: 6
[All CLTD Questions]

What facility location method has the advantage of analyzing both quantitative data and hard-to-evaluate criteria'?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: B

by Irma at Mar 07, 2026, 12:35 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium CLTD Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Submit Cancel
Jaime
3 days ago
I agree, B is the best choice. It balances hard data and qualitative aspects.
upvoted 0 times
...
Billye
8 days ago
I think it's B) Factor rating. It considers both numbers and subjective factors.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lavera
14 days ago
But C doesn’t really cover qualitative aspects like B does. Factor rating is more comprehensive.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jackie
19 days ago
I’m leaning towards C) Location and break-even analysis. It’s practical for cost evaluation.
upvoted 0 times
...
Hailey
24 days ago
I agree, Alex. It helps weigh different criteria effectively.
upvoted 0 times
...
Maryrose
29 days ago
I think B) Factor rating is the best choice. It considers both numbers and qualitative factors.
upvoted 0 times
...
Becky
1 month ago
But it misses the qualitative aspects. Factor rating covers that gap.
upvoted 0 times
...
Craig
1 month ago
I’m leaning towards A) Center-of-gravity. It’s straightforward for quantitative data.
upvoted 0 times
...
Arlene
1 month ago
I agree, Alex. It helps weigh different criteria effectively.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ma
2 months ago
I think B) Factor rating is the best choice. It considers both numbers and subjective factors.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lashandra
2 months ago
Factor rating is definitely the best for mixed criteria!
upvoted 0 times
...
Delpha
2 months ago
Really? I always thought center-of-gravity was the go-to for location decisions.
upvoted 0 times
...
Simona
4 months ago
Wait, are we sure about that? I thought break-even analysis was more comprehensive.
upvoted 0 times
...
Mari
4 months ago
Totally agree, factor rating is super versatile!
upvoted 0 times
...
Kayleigh
4 months ago
I think it's B) Factor rating. It considers both numbers and subjective factors.
upvoted 0 times
...
Clay
4 months ago
I never heard of factor rating before, sounds interesting!
upvoted 0 times
...
Trinidad
4 months ago
Yeah, factor rating is definitely the way to go for complex decisions!
upvoted 0 times
...
Gregoria
4 months ago
Wait, are we sure about that? I thought break-even analysis was better for this.
upvoted 0 times
...
Leonard
5 months ago
Totally agree, factor rating is super versatile!
upvoted 0 times
...
Sheridan
5 months ago
I think it's B) Factor rating. It covers both numbers and subjective stuff.
upvoted 0 times
...
Alonso
5 months ago
Least-cost-per-lane seems too focused on cost, so I doubt it analyzes hard-to-evaluate criteria like the others do.
upvoted 0 times
...
Paz
5 months ago
I feel like location and break-even analysis could also involve some qualitative aspects, but I can't recall the specifics right now.
upvoted 0 times
...
Micaela
5 months ago
I remember practicing a question similar to this, and I think center-of-gravity focuses more on quantitative data, so it might not be the right answer.
upvoted 0 times
...
Cecily
5 months ago
I think the factor rating method is the one that considers both quantitative and qualitative criteria, but I'm not entirely sure.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel