APICS CLTD Exam - Topic 4 Question 85 Discussion

Actual exam question for APICS's CLTD exam

Question #: 85
Topic #: 4

A corporation is redesigning its warehouse and has decided to use a rack system that allows each level to be accessed individually by placing pallets on wheeled frames. The rack system that best meets this criteria is:

Aflow-through.

Bpush-back.

Cdrive-in.

Ddouble-deep.

Show Suggested Answer

Suggested Answer: A

by Antonio at Aug 26, 2024, 03:25 PM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium CLTD Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel

Ezekiel

5 months ago

Totally agree, flow-through is the way to go for easy access!

upvoted 0 times

...

Evangelina

5 months ago

Wait, are they really going with flow-through? Seems risky!

upvoted 0 times

...

Larue

6 months ago

Drive-in racks are great for high-density storage, but not for individual access.

upvoted 0 times

...

Miss

6 months ago

I think push-back might work too, but not as efficiently.

upvoted 0 times

...

Terina

6 months ago

Flow-through racks allow for individual access, perfect for this setup!

upvoted 0 times

...

Tabetha

6 months ago

I recall that drive-in systems are more for high-density storage, so I don't think that's it. Maybe double-deep?

upvoted 0 times

...

Wai

7 months ago

I practiced a similar question, and I feel like push-back could be a contender, but I’m not confident about the wheeled frames part.

upvoted 0 times

...

Leatha

7 months ago

I think flow-through might be the right answer since it allows for easy access, but I need to double-check that.

upvoted 0 times

...

Andree

7 months ago

I remember studying different rack systems, but I'm not entirely sure which one allows for individual access.

upvoted 0 times

...

Coleen

7 months ago

This is a good test of our understanding of warehouse logistics. I'll draw a quick diagram of each rack system to visualize how they work and then match that up with the criteria given in the question. I'm confident I can figure out the right answer.

upvoted 0 times

...

Luke

7 months ago

I'm a little confused by the wording of this question. Can the individual levels really be accessed independently with a wheeled frame system? I'll need to think through the pros and cons of each option carefully before selecting my answer.

upvoted 0 times

...

Stephanie

7 months ago

Okay, I've got this. The question is asking for the rack system that allows each level to be accessed individually, and the options mention flow-through, push-back, drive-in, and double-deep. I think the flow-through system is the best match based on the criteria provided.

upvoted 0 times

...

Mose

7 months ago

Hmm, I'm a bit unsure about this one. I'll need to review my notes on the different types of warehouse rack systems and their characteristics to figure out which one allows individual level access with wheeled frames.

upvoted 0 times

...

Martha

7 months ago

This seems like a straightforward question about warehouse rack systems. I'll need to carefully consider the key criteria mentioned in the question to determine which option best meets them.

upvoted 0 times

...

Barrett

7 months ago

Community reports could be relevant, but I think they focus more on engagement rather than results. I guess campaign reports are more fitting.

upvoted 0 times

...

Leah

12 months ago

I'm just picturing someone trying to maneuver a forklift through a drive-in rack system. Sounds like a recipe for disaster and a whole lot of broken pallets. Flow-through all the way!

upvoted 0 times

Evan

11 months ago

Drive-in might be a bit tricky to navigate, but it can be efficient for certain warehouse layouts.

upvoted 0 times

...

Reita

11 months ago

I think push-back could also work well for maximizing storage space.

upvoted 0 times

...

Adelle

11 months ago

I agree, flow-through is definitely the way to go for easy access.

upvoted 0 times

...

Almeta

1 year ago

This is a no-brainer. The flow-through rack system is clearly the way to go. It's like a one-stop-shop for their individual access needs. I'm almost offended they even listed the other options.

upvoted 0 times

Nathalie

11 months ago

Absolutely, it's efficient and practical. The other options don't even come close.

upvoted 0 times

...

Dona

11 months ago

Yeah, it just makes the most sense for their needs. No need to overcomplicate things.

upvoted 0 times

...

Theodora

11 months ago

I agree, the flow-through rack system is definitely the best choice for easy individual access.

upvoted 0 times

...

Sheridan

1 year ago

I'm going with double-deep. Sure, it might not be the most intuitive choice, but it could maximize their storage space while still allowing them to access each level separately. Worth a shot, right?

upvoted 0 times

Demetra

11 months ago

Double-deep might be a good choice to maximize storage space.

upvoted 0 times

...

Lili

12 months ago

I'm leaning towards flow-through, it seems like a more efficient option.

upvoted 0 times

...

Melissa

12 months ago

I think double-deep could work well for that setup.

upvoted 0 times

...

Bea

1 year ago

I'm torn between the push-back and drive-in options. Both seem to offer the kind of individual access they're looking for, but I'm not sure which one would work better in their specific warehouse setup.

upvoted 0 times

Jerry

12 months ago

True, the drive-in system might be more space-efficient for your specific needs.

upvoted 0 times

...

Ashlyn

12 months ago

But the drive-in option could also work well, it depends on the layout of your warehouse.

upvoted 0 times

...

Levi

12 months ago

I agree, the push-back system allows for individual access to each level.

upvoted 0 times

...

Nickole

12 months ago

I think the push-back option might be better for your warehouse setup.

upvoted 0 times

...

Kristel

1 year ago

The flow-through rack system seems like the obvious choice here. It allows for individual access to each level, which is exactly what the corporation needs.

upvoted 0 times