Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

APICS Exam CLTD Topic 3 Question 89 Discussion

Actual exam question for APICS's CLTD exam
Question #: 89
Topic #: 3
[All CLTD Questions]

A company currently has a significantly long lead time in determining the disposition of returned products Which of the following nonprocedural areas should the company look into as it performs a root cause analysis?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: C

Contribute your Thoughts:

Olga
2 months ago
I bet the financial department is just 'returning' the problem back to the other departments. Option A sounds like a classic case of passing the buck.
upvoted 0 times
Leslie
2 months ago
User 3
upvoted 0 times
...
Vallie
2 months ago
User 2
upvoted 0 times
...
Catalina
2 months ago
User 1
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Darnell
3 months ago
You know, if this company has a lot of returns, they might want to consider hiring a professional 'ball juggler' to keep all the departments straight. Just a thought.
upvoted 0 times
Kris
1 months ago
D) Material handling department to see if it is taking excessive time to handle defective product
upvoted 0 times
...
Ilene
2 months ago
B) Quality department to see if the process for determining disposition is inefficient
upvoted 0 times
...
Leatha
2 months ago
B) Quality department to see if the process for determining disposition is inefficient
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Rodolfo
3 months ago
Ah, the age-old question of where to point the finger when things go wrong. I'm going with option C - customer service is probably the one dropping the ball here, as usual.
upvoted 0 times
Valentine
2 months ago
Financial department to see if the sales personnel are reluctant to charge the returns to sales
upvoted 0 times
...
Izetta
2 months ago
Quality department to see if the process for determining disposition is inefficient
upvoted 0 times
...
Jamal
2 months ago
Customer service department to see if they are taking a long time to address customer concerns
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Hobert
3 months ago
I think option D is worth looking into as well. If the material handling department is taking too long to handle the returned products, that could definitely contribute to the long lead time.
upvoted 0 times
Marleen
2 months ago
Yes, the material handling department's efficiency is crucial in reducing lead time for returned products.
upvoted 0 times
...
Marleen
2 months ago
I agree, option D could be a major factor in the long lead time.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Tamekia
3 months ago
But what about the material handling department? Maybe that's where the issue lies.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tresa
3 months ago
I agree with Joye, inefficient processes could be causing the long lead time.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jannette
3 months ago
Option B seems like the most logical choice here. The question is specifically asking about the root cause of the long lead time in determining product dispositions, and the quality department would be the best place to look for inefficiencies in that process.
upvoted 0 times
Mindy
2 months ago
I see your point, but I still think option B is the most relevant in this situation.
upvoted 0 times
...
Mindy
3 months ago
I think we should also consider option D, as handling defective products could be causing delays.
upvoted 0 times
...
Mindy
3 months ago
I agree, option B seems like the best choice to investigate.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Joye
3 months ago
I think the company should look into the quality department.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel