Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

API-571 Exam - Topic 1 Question 122 Discussion

Actual exam question for API's API-571 exam
Question #: 122
Topic #: 1
[All API-571 Questions]

(What steel alloy is no longer recommended for services susceptible to HTHA?)

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: C

Comprehensive and Detailed Explanation From Exact Extract:

According to API RP 571 and API RP 941 (Nelson Curves), 1 Cr--0.5 Mo steel is no longer recommended for services susceptible to High-Temperature Hydrogen Attack (HTHA).

API RP 941 documents industry experience showing that 1 Cr--0.5 Mo steels have suffered HTHA damage below previously assumed safe operating limits, due to insufficient carbide stability. As a result, this material has been removed from the Nelson Curves as an acceptable choice for new construction in hydrogen service.

By contrast:

Mn--0.5 Mo, C--0.5 Mo, and 1.25 Cr--0.5 Mo steels retain higher resistance due to more stable carbide structures.

Referenced Documents (Study Basis):

API RP 571 -- Section on High-Temperature Hydrogen Attack

API RP 941 -- Updated Nelson Curves and Material Recommendations


Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Judy
10 hours ago
I’m a bit confused; I thought C--0.5 Mo steel was still acceptable. Did we cover any specific reasons why it might not be recommended anymore?
upvoted 0 times
...
Maryrose
6 days ago
I feel like we had a practice question about Mn--0.5 Mo steel being less reliable under certain conditions. Could that be the answer?
upvoted 0 times
...
Fallon
11 days ago
I think I remember that 1.25 Cr--0.5 Mo steel was mentioned in our class as being more resistant to HTHA, but I'm not entirely sure.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel