Where was the first urban growth boundary established in the US?
You want to be fair in your treatment of a colleague while at the same time making sure that you do not engage a consultant who will not be able to fulfill the requirements of the professional services agreement.
Alternative 1 saves you work, but ignores the fact that you have information which affects your confidence in one of the proposers You would not be in violation of the Code by doing nothing because you would have followed all of your community's standard procedures for hiring However, you would have failed to be attentive to the apparitional intent of the Code.
Alternative 2 would be the most desirable and is most consistent with the Code requirement to fairly treat the views of a colleague In this case you wish to treat fairly the views of those who have disparaged the consultant as well as the view of the consultant him or herself Unless you have specifically stated in your RFP that the only references you will check are those provided by the consultant, you are free to seek out additional information. To be fair, you should mention to the consultant that you will be checking with other colleagues. If you have major unresolved issues as a result of further checking, the consultant should be given an opportunity to respond.
Valentin
6 months agoMozell
6 months agoMarvel
6 months agoYuonne
7 months agoGalen
7 months agoBrianne
7 months agoLayla
7 months agoMerissa
7 months agoLavera
8 months agoGracia
8 months agoAlease
8 months agoArthur
8 months agoErasmo
8 months agoCecilia
1 year agoRosina
11 months agoWilda
11 months agoRene
12 months agoTruman
1 year agoMartina
1 year agoWinfred
1 year agoCorazon
1 year agoRoxane
1 year agoLouvenia
11 months agoRobt
11 months agoArlene
11 months agoSimona
11 months agoJohnna
11 months agoKayleigh
12 months agoKimberely
1 year agoAlayna
1 year agoJoanna
1 year agoMalinda
1 year agoMarva
1 year agoMaddie
1 year agoCoral
1 year agoShaunna
12 months agoTonette
1 year agoKenneth
1 year agoGoldie
1 year ago