Amazon Exam SCS-C01 Topic 5 Question 53 Discussion

Actual exam question for Amazon's SCS-C01 exam

Question #: 53
Topic #: 5

A company uses AWS Organizations to manage a small number of AWS accounts. However, the company plans to add 1 000 more accounts soon. The company allows only a centralized security team to create IAM roles for all AWS accounts and teams. Application teams submit requests for IAM roles to the security team. The security team has a backlog of IAM role requests and cannot review and provision the IAM roles quickly.

The security team must create a process that will allow application teams to provision their own IAM roles. The process must also limit the scope of IAM roles and prevent privilege escalation.

Which solution will meet these requirements with the LEAST operational overhead?

ACreate an IAM group for each application team. Associate policies with each IAM group. Provision IAM users for each application team member. Add the new IAM users to the appropriate IAM group by using role-based access control (RBAC).

BDelegate application team leads to provision IAM rotes for each team. Conduct a quarterly review of the IAM rotes the team leads have provisioned. Ensure that the application team leads have the appropriate training to review IAM roles.

CPut each AWS account in its own OU. Add an SCP to each OU to grant access to only the AWS services that the teams plan to use. Include conditions tn the AWS account of each team.

DCreate an SCP and a permissions boundary for IAM roles. Add the SCP to the root OU so that only roles that have the permissions boundary attached can create any new IAM roles.

Show Suggested Answer

Suggested Answer: D

To create a process that will allow application teams to provision their own IAM roles, while limiting the scope of IAM roles and preventing privilege escalation, the following steps are required:

Create a service control policy (SCP) that defines the maximum permissions that can be granted to any IAM role in the organization. An SCP is a type of policy that you can use with AWS Organizations to manage permissions for all accounts in your organization. SCPs restrict permissions for entities in member accounts, including each AWS account root user, IAM users, and roles. For more information, see Service control policies overview.

Create a permissions boundary for IAM roles that matches the SCP. A permissions boundary is an advanced feature for using a managed policy to set the maximum permissions that an identity-based policy can grant to an IAM entity. A permissions boundary allows an entity to perform only the actions that are allowed by both its identity-based policies and its permissions boundaries. For more information, see Permissions boundaries for IAM entities.

Add the SCP to the root organizational unit (OU) so that it applies to all accounts in the organization. This will ensure that no IAM role can exceed the permissions defined by the SCP, regardless of how it is created or modified.

Instruct the application teams to attach the permissions boundary to any IAM role they create. This will prevent them from creating IAM roles that can escalate their own privileges or access resources they are not authorized to access.

This solution will meet the requirements with the least operational overhead, as it leverages AWS Organizations and IAM features to delegate and limit IAM role creation without requiring manual reviews or approvals.

The other options are incorrect because they either do not allow application teams to provision their own IAM roles (A), do not limit the scope of IAM roles or prevent privilege escalation (B), or do not take advantage of managed services whenever possible .

Verified Reference:

https://docs.aws.amazon.com/organizations/latest/userguide/orgs_manage_policies_scp.html

https://docs.aws.amazon.com/IAM/latest/UserGuide/access_policies_boundaries.html

by Tarra at Jan 22, 2024, 08:50 PM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium SCS-C01 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel

Frederick

9 days ago

Option B? Really? Delegating to the team leads? That's just passing the buck, if you ask me. And quarterly reviews? Talk about a time sink.

upvoted 0 times

...

Corrinne

10 days ago

I'm leaning towards option D. Creating an SCP and a permissions boundary for IAM roles seems like a good way to maintain control while still allowing the teams to manage their own stuff.

upvoted 0 times

...

Francoise

11 days ago

You know, at this rate, the security team's going to be so overworked, they'll start showing up to meetings in their pajamas. 'Sorry, guys, I just can't even right now.'

upvoted 0 times

...

Elvis

12 days ago

Hmm, this is a tricky one. I'm not sure I'm a fan of the whole 'centralized security team' idea. Seems like a bottleneck waiting to happen, especially with that growing number of accounts.

upvoted 0 times

...