MENU
A company uses AWS Organizations. The company creates a central VPC in an AWS account that is designated for networking in a single AWS Region. The central VPC has an AWS Site-to-Site VPN connection to the company's on-premises network. A solutions architect must create another AWS account that uses the same networking resources that the central VPC uses.
Which solution meets these requirements MOST cost-effectively?
Suggested Answer: D
Get Premium SAP-C02 Questions
as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF
Real Exam Format
Detailed Explanations
Instant Access
Get Your Practice Test
32 comments · newest first
TY
Tyra
7 months ago
I’m leaning towards B too now.
TE
Teddy
7 months ago
Exactly! Less hassle with B.
ST
Stephane
7 months ago
True, but D allows more control over resources.
TY
Tyra
7 months ago
But D might complicate routing. B is simpler.
VE
Veronika
8 months ago
I prefer option D. Sharing subnets seems efficient.
TE
Teddy
8 months ago
It saves costs by sharing the VPN connection.
ST
Stephane
8 months ago
Why B?
SK
Skye
8 months ago
Totally agree with B, it's efficient and saves money!
BO
Bo
9 months ago
D seems risky; sharing subnets could lead to issues.
LO
Louisa
9 months ago
Surprised that sharing resources isn't more common!
ST
Staci
9 months ago
I think A is a better option. New VPCs are straightforward.
BO
Boris
9 months ago
Option B is the clear winner here. Why reinvent the wheel when you can just share the resources?
LE
Leonardo
9 months ago
Haha, who needs a new VPN connection when you can just share the one you already have? Option B all the way!
CH
Chu
9 months ago
I agree, reusing the VPN connection is the way to go. Saves us a lot of time and money.
KR
Krissy
10 months ago
I think creating a new VPC and VPN connection could be more expensive, but I’m not sure if sharing subnets would actually work for this scenario.
WA
Walton
10 months ago
I feel like option B might be the right choice since it mentions sharing resources, but I’m a bit confused about how that would work with the VPN.
SO
Sonia
10 months ago
B is the best choice for cost-effectiveness!
AL
Aleta
10 months ago
Option B seems the most cost-effective, as it allows us to reuse the existing VPN connection.
TE
Teddy
10 months ago
I think option B is the best choice.
PA
Pansy
11 months ago
Sharing the VPN connection is the smart move. Option B is the way to go, no doubt about it.
VE
Veronika
11 months ago
Still, B reduces setup time and expenses.
LI
Lisha
11 months ago
This question seems similar to one we practiced about VPC sharing, but I think the focus on cost-effectiveness is new.
MO
Mona
11 months ago
I remember studying about AWS Resource Access Manager, but I'm not entirely sure how it applies to sharing VPN connections.
LO
Lorean
11 months ago
I'm leaning towards option B. Sharing the existing VPN connection seems like the simplest and most straightforward solution to meet the requirements.
DE
Desirae
12 months ago
Option C seems like it could work, but I'm worried about the complexity of setting up a virtual private gateway to connect the VPCs. That might end up being more expensive in the long run.
TR
Tricia
12 months ago
I'm a bit confused about the difference between option B and option D. Both seem to involve sharing resources, but I'm not sure which one is more appropriate here.
TA
Tabetha
12 months ago
I think option B looks the most cost-effective since it allows us to reuse the existing VPN connection instead of creating a new one.
EL
Elouise
6 months ago
Sharing resources is the way to go! Cost-effective and practical.
CH
Christiane
6 months ago
I like option B too. Efficient use of existing infrastructure.
JO
Johnathon
6 months ago
Plus, it simplifies management. Less complexity is better.
DE
Deandrea
6 months ago
Definitely! No need for extra VPN costs.
SA
Sabine
7 months ago
I agree, option B seems smart. Reusing resources saves money.