Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Amazon SAP-C02 Exam - Topic 1 Question 58 Discussion

Actual exam question for Amazon's SAP-C02 exam
Question #: 58
Topic #: 1
[All SAP-C02 Questions]

A company is planning to migrate an application to AWS. The application runs as a Docker container and uses an NFS version 4 file share.

A solutions architect must design a secure and scalable containerized solution that does not require provisioning or management of the underlying infrastructure.

Which solution will meet these requirements?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: A

This option uses Amazon Elastic Container Service (Amazon ECS) with the Fargate launch type to deploy the application containers. Amazon ECS is a fully managed container orchestration service that allows running Docker containers on AWS at scale. Fargate is a serverless compute engine for containers that eliminates the need to provision or manage servers or clusters. With Fargate, the company only pays for the resources required to run its containers, which reduces costs and operational overhead. This option also uses Amazon Elastic File System (Amazon EFS) for shared storage. Amazon EFS is a fully managed file system that provides scalable, elastic, concurrent, and secure file storage for use with AWS cloud services. Amazon EFS supports NFS version 4 protocol, which is compatible with the application's requirements. To use Amazon EFS with Fargate containers, the company needs to reference the EFS file system ID, container mount point, and EFS authorization IAM role in the ECS task definition.


Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Leontine
3 months ago
Wait, can EFS really handle the performance needs of a heavy app?
upvoted 0 times
...
Stefan
3 months ago
Totally agree, Fargate makes it so much easier to manage!
upvoted 0 times
...
Cruz
3 months ago
I’m not sure about using EFS, isn’t it slower than FSx for Lustre?
upvoted 0 times
...
Francine
4 months ago
Definitely A! It’s secure and scalable without the hassle of EC2.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tiera
4 months ago
Option A is the best choice! EFS is perfect for shared storage.
upvoted 0 times
...
Vallie
4 months ago
I have a vague memory of EBS not being suitable for shared storage across multiple containers, so I would lean away from option D.
upvoted 0 times
...
Linwood
4 months ago
I practiced a similar question where EFS was recommended for containerized applications. I think option A makes the most sense.
upvoted 0 times
...
Berry
4 months ago
I'm not entirely sure, but I think EFS is the right choice for shared storage since it supports NFS, unlike FSx for Lustre.
upvoted 0 times
...
Queen
5 months ago
I remember studying about Fargate and how it abstracts the underlying infrastructure, which seems to fit the requirements here.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kristine
5 months ago
I'm feeling pretty confident about this. The Fargate launch type with EFS seems like the most straightforward and secure solution that meets all the requirements.
upvoted 0 times
...
Corinne
5 months ago
Okay, the key things I need to focus on are security, scalability, and not having to manage the underlying infrastructure. I'm leaning towards the Fargate option with EFS, but I'll double-check the other choices.
upvoted 0 times
...
Adelina
5 months ago
Hmm, I'm a bit confused about the file storage options. I'll need to carefully review the details of EFS, FSx for Lustre, and EBS to decide which one best fits the requirements.
upvoted 0 times
...
Maryann
5 months ago
This looks like a straightforward question about containerized solutions on AWS. I think I can handle this one.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jimmie
6 months ago
That makes sense. Thanks for explaining!
upvoted 0 times
...
Emmanuel
6 months ago
Because using Amazon ECS with EC2 launch type and auto scaling will provide more control over the infrastructure.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jimmie
7 months ago
Why do you think C is the right choice?
upvoted 0 times
...
Emmanuel
7 months ago
I disagree, I believe the correct answer is C.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jamal
7 months ago
Ah, I'm thinking B might work too. FSx for Lustre could be a good option if you need high-performance shared storage.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jimmie
7 months ago
I think the answer is A.
upvoted 0 times
...
Bronwyn
7 months ago
Hmm, I'm pretty sure the answer is A. Fargate is the way to go for this use case, and EFS seems like the obvious choice for shared storage.
upvoted 0 times
Kimi
6 months ago
Definitely, option A seems to be the most suitable solution for this migration to AWS.
upvoted 0 times
...
Earnestine
6 months ago
Referencing the EFS file system ID, container mount point, and EFS authorization IAM role in the ECS task definition will ensure everything is set up correctly.
upvoted 0 times
...
Mila
6 months ago
Using EFS for shared storage makes sense in this scenario, it provides scalable and secure file storage for the containers.
upvoted 0 times
...
Nu
6 months ago
I agree, Fargate is a great choice for managing containers without worrying about the underlying infrastructure.
upvoted 0 times
...
...

Save Cancel