New Year Sale 2026! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Amazon SAP-C02 Exam - Topic 1 Question 10 Discussion

Actual exam question for Amazon's SAP-C02 exam
Question #: 10
Topic #: 1
[All SAP-C02 Questions]

A company runs a processing engine in the AWS Cloud The engine processes environmental data from logistics centers to calculate a sustainability index The company has millions of devices in logistics centers that are spread across Europe The devices send information to the processing engine through a RESTful API

The API experiences unpredictable bursts of traffic The company must implement a solution to process all data that the devices send to the processing engine Data loss is unacceptable

Which solution will meet these requirements?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: A

it will use the ALB to handle the unpredictable bursts of traffic and route it to the SQS queue. The SQS queue will act as a buffer to store incoming data temporarily and the container running in Amazon ECS with the Fargate launch type will process messages in the queue. This approach will ensure that all data is processed and prevent data loss.


Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Bette
4 months ago
C sounds complicated, not sure if it's the best choice.
upvoted 0 times
...
Penney
4 months ago
Totally agree with B, Lambda is great for processing!
upvoted 0 times
...
Doyle
4 months ago
Wait, can SQS really handle that much traffic?
upvoted 0 times
...
Theodora
4 months ago
I think A is better for scaling with ECS!
upvoted 0 times
...
Viki
4 months ago
Option B seems solid with API Gateway and SQS.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tomas
5 months ago
I’m a bit confused about the differences between API Gateway types. Is the REST API in option C really necessary, or would the HTTP API work just as well?
upvoted 0 times
...
Mitsue
5 months ago
I feel like I’ve seen a similar question before, and I think the key is ensuring no data loss. So, maybe option B with SQS is the safest bet?
upvoted 0 times
...
Kent
5 months ago
I'm not entirely sure, but I think option A might be better since it uses ECS and Fargate, which could handle scaling more effectively than just Lambda.
upvoted 0 times
...
Cordelia
5 months ago
I remember studying about using SQS for handling bursts of traffic, so option B seems like a solid choice with the API Gateway and Lambda integration.
upvoted 0 times
...
Melissa
5 months ago
Option D sounds interesting with Kinesis, but I’m not clear on how it handles the RESTful API part. I think I need to review that concept again.
upvoted 0 times
...
Desmond
5 months ago
I practiced a similar question where we had to choose between API Gateway and EC2 instances. I feel like option C might be overkill for this scenario, but I can't recall the specifics.
upvoted 0 times
...
Linn
5 months ago
I'm not entirely sure, but I think the ALB in option A could help distribute the load effectively. Still, I wonder if it’s the best choice for ensuring no data loss.
upvoted 0 times
...
Benedict
5 months ago
I remember studying about using SQS for handling bursts of traffic, so option B seems like a good fit with the Lambda function processing messages.
upvoted 0 times
...
Viva
5 months ago
I'm a bit confused by the "ENC to ENC" option - that doesn't seem right to me, so I'll skip that one.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jean
5 months ago
I'm a bit confused by all these different vm_maker commands. I'll need to review the material on Exadata virtual machines more carefully to make sure I understand the right approach here.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel