Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Amazon SAP-C02 Exam - Topic 1 Question 10 Discussion

Posted by Louvenia on Mar 22, 2023 at 10:04 PM

A company runs a processing engine in the AWS Cloud The engine processes environmental data from logistics centers to calculate a sustainability index The company has millions of devices in logistics centers that are spread across Europe The devices send information to the processing engine through a RESTful API

The API experiences unpredictable bursts of traffic The company must implement a solution to process all data that the devices send to the processing engine Data loss is unacceptable

Which solution will meet these requirements?

Suggested Answer: A

it will use the ALB to handle the unpredictable bursts of traffic and route it to the SQS queue. The SQS queue will act as a buffer to store incoming data temporarily and the container running in Amazon ECS with the Fargate launch type will process messages in the queue. This approach will ensure that all data is processed and prevent data loss.


Get Premium SAP-C02 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF Real Exam Format Detailed Explanations Instant Access Get Your Practice Test
15 comments · newest first
BE
Bette 11 months ago
C sounds complicated, not sure if it's the best choice.
PE
Penney 12 months ago
Totally agree with B, Lambda is great for processing!
DO
Doyle 12 months ago
Wait, can SQS really handle that much traffic?
TH
Theodora 1 year ago
I think A is better for scaling with ECS!
VI
Viki 1 year ago
Option B seems solid with API Gateway and SQS.
TO
Tomas 1 year ago
I’m a bit confused about the differences between API Gateway types. Is the REST API in option C really necessary, or would the HTTP API work just as well?
MI
Mitsue 1 year ago
I feel like I’ve seen a similar question before, and I think the key is ensuring no data loss. So, maybe option B with SQS is the safest bet?
KE
Kent 1 year ago
I'm not entirely sure, but I think option A might be better since it uses ECS and Fargate, which could handle scaling more effectively than just Lambda.
CO
Cordelia 1 year ago
I remember studying about using SQS for handling bursts of traffic, so option B seems like a solid choice with the API Gateway and Lambda integration.
ME
Melissa 1 year ago
Option D sounds interesting with Kinesis, but I’m not clear on how it handles the RESTful API part. I think I need to review that concept again.
DE
Desmond 1 year ago
I practiced a similar question where we had to choose between API Gateway and EC2 instances. I feel like option C might be overkill for this scenario, but I can't recall the specifics.
LI
Linn 1 year ago
I'm not entirely sure, but I think the ALB in option A could help distribute the load effectively. Still, I wonder if it’s the best choice for ensuring no data loss.
BE
Benedict 1 year ago
I remember studying about using SQS for handling bursts of traffic, so option B seems like a good fit with the Lambda function processing messages.
VI
Viva 1 year ago
I'm a bit confused by the "ENC to ENC" option - that doesn't seem right to me, so I'll skip that one.
JE
Jean 1 year ago
I'm a bit confused by all these different vm_maker commands. I'll need to review the material on Exadata virtual machines more carefully to make sure I understand the right approach here.
0/2000 characters

Save Cancel