New Year Sale 2026! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Amazon SAA-C03 Exam - Topic 12 Question 34 Discussion

Actual exam question for Amazon's SAA-C03 exam
Question #: 34
Topic #: 12
[All SAA-C03 Questions]

Asocial media company has workloads that collect and process data The workloads store the data in on-premises NFS storage The data store cannot scale fast enough to meet the company's expanding business needs The company wants to migrate the current data store to AWS

Which solution will meet these requirements MOST cost-effectively?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: B

This solution meets the requirements most cost-effectively because it enables the company to migrate its on-premises NFS data store to AWS without changing the existing applications or workflows. AWS Storage Gateway is a hybrid cloud storage service that provides seamless and secure integration between on-premises and AWS storage. Amazon S3 File Gateway is a type of AWS Storage Gateway that provides a file interface to Amazon S3, with local caching for low-latency access. By setting up an Amazon S3 File Gateway, the company can store and retrieve files as objects in Amazon S3 using standard file protocols such as NFS. The company can also use an Amazon S3 Lifecycle policy to automatically transition the data to the appropriate storage class based on the frequency of access and the cost of storage. For example, the company can use S3 Standard for frequently accessed data, S3 Standard-Infrequent Access (S3 Standard-IA) or S3 One Zone-Infrequent Access (S3 One Zone-IA) for less frequently accessed data, and S3 Glacier or S3 Glacier Deep Archive for long-term archival data.

Option A is not a valid solution because AWS Storage Gateway Volume Gateway is a type of AWS Storage Gateway that provides a block interface to Amazon S3, with local caching for low-latency access. Volume Gateway is not suitable for migrating an NFS data store, as it requires attaching the volumes to EC2 instances or on-premises servers using the iSCSI protocol. Option C is not a valid solution because Amazon Elastic File System (Amazon EFS) is a fully managed elastic NFS file system that is designed for workloads that require high availability, scalability, and performance. Amazon EFS Standard-Infrequent Access (Standard-IA) is a storage class within Amazon EFS that is optimized for infrequently accessed files, with a lower price per GB and a higher price per access. Using Amazon EFS Standard-IA for migrating an NFS data store would not be cost-effective, as it would incur higher access charges and require additional configuration to enable lifecycle management. Option D is not a valid solution because Amazon EFS One Zone-Infrequent Access (One Zone-IA) is a storage class within Amazon EFS that is optimized for infrequently accessed files that do not require the availability and durability of Amazon EFS Standard or Standard-IA. Amazon EFS One Zone-IA stores data in a single Availability Zone, which reduces the cost by 47% compared to Amazon EFS Standard-IA, but also increases the risk of data loss in the event of an Availability Zone failure. Using Amazon EFS One Zone-IA for migrating an NFS data store would not be cost-effective, as it would incur higher access charges and require additional configuration to enable lifecycle management. It would also compromise the availability and durability of the data.


AWS Storage Gateway - Amazon Web Services

Amazon S3 File Gateway - AWS Storage Gateway

Object Lifecycle Management - Amazon Simple Storage Service

[AWS Storage Gateway Volume Gateway - AWS Storage Gateway]

[Amazon Elastic File System - Amazon Web Services]

[Using EFS storage classes - Amazon Elastic File System]

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Candida
3 months ago
Totally agree with B, it’s a solid choice!
upvoted 0 times
...
Ruby
3 months ago
Wait, can AWS really handle all that data efficiently?
upvoted 0 times
...
Lon
3 months ago
EFS is great, but isn't it pricier than S3 options?
upvoted 0 times
...
Jess
4 months ago
I think A could work too, but not sure it's the most cost-effective.
upvoted 0 times
...
Edgar
4 months ago
Option B seems like the best fit for file access.
upvoted 0 times
...
Keith
4 months ago
I feel like the File Gateway option might be more suitable for the workloads since it integrates directly with S3, but I need to double-check the details.
upvoted 0 times
...
Cyril
4 months ago
I practiced a similar question about EFS and its storage classes, but I'm uncertain if Standard-IA or One Zone-IA would be the best choice here.
upvoted 0 times
...
Noemi
4 months ago
I think using Amazon S3 with a lifecycle policy could be a cost-effective way to manage data, but I can't recall the specifics of how the File Gateway works.
upvoted 0 times
...
Alyce
5 months ago
I remember studying about AWS Storage Gateway, but I'm not sure if the Volume Gateway or File Gateway is better for this scenario.
upvoted 0 times
...
Felix
5 months ago
This is a great opportunity to showcase my understanding of AWS storage services. I'll carefully evaluate each option and select the one that best meets the requirements.
upvoted 0 times
...
Brice
5 months ago
I'm a bit unsure about the differences between the EFS storage classes. I'll need to review the pricing and performance characteristics to determine the most cost-effective option.
upvoted 0 times
...
Chantell
5 months ago
Okay, I think I've got it. The AWS Storage Gateway options seem like a good fit, as they can integrate on-premises storage with scalable cloud storage.
upvoted 0 times
...
Daryl
5 months ago
Hmm, the key seems to be finding a cost-effective solution that can scale to meet the company's growing needs. I'll need to carefully consider the storage options and lifecycle policies.
upvoted 0 times
...
Yuette
5 months ago
This question seems straightforward, but I want to make sure I understand the requirements correctly before selecting an answer.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rosio
5 months ago
Okay, I think I've got this. The number of updates in the "Updates" column should match the number in the "Available" column, right? That would mean the bulletin has fully downloaded. I'm feeling confident about this one.
upvoted 0 times
...
Marquetta
5 months ago
This seems like a straightforward question. I'll review the options carefully and go with the one that best matches the primary reason for conducting post-incident reviews.
upvoted 0 times
...
Frederick
2 years ago
Maybe, but EFS might be more costly. B seems safer.
upvoted 0 times
...
Val
2 years ago
Not sure. Isn't Amazon EFS a good option too?
upvoted 0 times
...
Alpha
2 years ago
B for me as well. It’s more cost-effective with Amazon S3 File Gateway.
upvoted 0 times
...
Hyman
2 years ago
I think option B makes the most sense. S3 has a great lifecycle policy.
upvoted 0 times
...
Frederick
2 years ago
Yeah, definitely. Leaning towards options involving S3 though.
upvoted 0 times
...
Val
2 years ago
This question feels quite tricky. What do you think?
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel