Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

Amazon SAA-C03 Exam - Topic 1 Question 62 Discussion

A company needs to retain application logs files for a critical application for 10 years. The application team regularly accesses logs from the past month for troubleshooting, but logs older than 1 month are rarely accessed. The application generates more than 10 TB of logs per month.Which storage option meets these requirements MOST cost-effectively?
B) Store the logs in Amazon S3 Use S3 Lifecycle policies to move logs more than 1 month old to S3 Glacier Deep Archive
A) Store the Iogs in Amazon S3 Use AWS Backup lo move logs more than 1 month old to S3 Glacier Deep Archive
C) Store the logs in Amazon CloudWatch Logs Use AWS Backup to move logs more then 1 month old to S3 Glacier Deep Archive
D) Store the logs in Amazon CloudWatch Logs Use Amazon S3 Lifecycle policies to move logs more than 1 month old to S3 Glacier Deep Archive

Amazon SAA-C03 Exam - Topic 1 Question 62 Discussion

Actual exam question for Amazon's SAA-C03 exam
Question #: 62
Topic #: 1
[All SAA-C03 Questions]

A company needs to retain application logs files for a critical application for 10 years. The application team regularly accesses logs from the past month for troubleshooting, but logs older than 1 month are rarely accessed. The application generates more than 10 TB of logs per month.

Which storage option meets these requirements MOST cost-effectively?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: B

You need S3 to be able to archive the logs after one month. Cannot do that with CloudWatch Logs.


by Bettina at Jul 14, 2025, 05:22 PM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium SAA-C03 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Submit Cancel
Goldie
8 months ago
I think D could work too, but B is definitely more straightforward.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dusti
9 months ago
Wait, why not just use A? Seems simpler.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kristin
9 months ago
Option B is the best choice for cost-effectiveness!
upvoted 0 times
...
Jaclyn
9 months ago
I agree, B seems to fit the requirements perfectly.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lourdes
9 months ago
10 TB a month? Wow, that's a lot of logs! Are they really that necessary?
upvoted 0 times
...
Terry
9 months ago
I recall that S3 Lifecycle policies are generally more efficient for this kind of log management, but I can't remember if CloudWatch would complicate things.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jacki
10 months ago
I’m a bit confused about whether AWS Backup is necessary here. I feel like we might have covered that in a different context.
upvoted 0 times
...
Gene
10 months ago
I think using S3 with lifecycle policies makes sense since it automates the moving of logs to Glacier. That sounds familiar from our practice questions.
upvoted 0 times
...
Willard
10 months ago
I remember discussing the cost-effectiveness of S3 versus CloudWatch for log storage, but I'm not sure which option is best here.
upvoted 0 times
...
Marquetta
10 months ago
Option B looks good to me. S3 and Glacier Deep Archive should provide the right balance of accessibility and cost savings.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jeniffer
10 months ago
I'm a bit confused about the differences between the options. I'll need to research AWS Backup and CloudWatch Logs a bit more to make a confident decision.
upvoted 0 times
...
Burma
11 months ago
I'm leaning towards option B. Using S3 Lifecycle policies to move older logs to Glacier Deep Archive seems like the most cost-effective approach.
upvoted 0 times
...
Glenna
11 months ago
Okay, let's break this down. We need to store 10+ TB of logs per month for 10 years, with quick access to the past month's logs.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kassandra
11 months ago
Hmm, this looks like a tricky one. I'll need to carefully consider the storage options and cost implications.
upvoted 0 times
...
Marsha
1 year ago
Option B all the way! S3 and Glacier Deep Archive are a match made in heaven. Though I do wonder if the logs will haunt the developers in their dreams, like ghosts of bugs past.
upvoted 0 times
Colette
12 months ago
D: Hopefully they won't miss it too much, but at least the logs will be safely stored in Glacier Deep Archive.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tina
12 months ago
C: I wonder if the application team will miss digging through old logs for troubleshooting.
upvoted 0 times
...
Crista
1 year ago
B: I agree, it's a cost-effective solution for storing logs long-term.
upvoted 0 times
...
Glendora
1 year ago
A: Option B is definitely the way to go. S3 Lifecycle policies make it easy to manage the logs.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
German
1 year ago
I agree with King, option D seems like the most efficient option.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lenora
1 year ago
Hmm, I don't know. Option A with AWS Backup seems interesting too. Maybe it provides some extra features or flexibility that could be useful. But yeah, Option B is probably the most straightforward and cost-effective choice.
upvoted 0 times
Melissa
12 months ago
Yeah, Option B does seem like the most cost-effective option.
upvoted 0 times
...
Esteban
1 year ago
I agree, Option B with S3 Lifecycle policies seems more straightforward and cost-effective.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lucille
1 year ago
Option A with AWS Backup seems like a good choice for extra features.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
King
1 year ago
I'm leaning towards option D because it seems like a good solution.
upvoted 0 times
...
Sylvia
1 year ago
I disagree, I believe option B is more cost-effective.
upvoted 0 times
...
Aimee
1 year ago
I think option A is the best choice.
upvoted 0 times
...
Latia
1 year ago
I agree with Bobbye. Option B is the way to go. S3 is reliable and Glacier Deep Archive is dirt cheap for cold storage. Plus, no need to mess with CloudWatch Logs or AWS Backup, which adds unnecessary complexity.
upvoted 0 times
Maryann
1 year ago
Yeah, I agree. S3 is reliable and Glacier Deep Archive is cheap for storing logs long term.
upvoted 0 times
...
Shawna
1 year ago
I think option B is the best choice. S3 with Lifecycle policies to Glacier Deep Archive is cost-effective.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Bobbye
1 year ago
Option B seems like the most straightforward and cost-effective solution. S3 Lifecycle policies can automatically move the logs to Glacier Deep Archive, which is perfect for long-term storage that's rarely accessed.
upvoted 0 times
Nieves
1 year ago
Definitely, it's important to find a balance between accessibility and cost when dealing with large amounts of data like this.
upvoted 0 times
...
Halina
1 year ago
I agree, it's a smart way to manage storage costs while still retaining access to older logs when needed.
upvoted 0 times
...
Coletta
1 year ago
Option B sounds like a good choice. Using S3 Lifecycle policies to move logs to Glacier Deep Archive is efficient.
upvoted 0 times
...
...

Save Cancel