Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Amazon Exam SAA-C03 Topic 1 Question 62 Discussion

Actual exam question for Amazon's SAA-C03 exam
Question #: 62
Topic #: 1
[All SAA-C03 Questions]

A company needs to retain application logs files for a critical application for 10 years. The application team regularly accesses logs from the past month for troubleshooting, but logs older than 1 month are rarely accessed. The application generates more than 10 TB of logs per month.

Which storage option meets these requirements MOST cost-effectively?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: B

You need S3 to be able to archive the logs after one month. Cannot do that with CloudWatch Logs.


Contribute your Thoughts:

Sylvia
2 days ago
I disagree, I believe option B is more cost-effective.
upvoted 0 times
...
Aimee
4 days ago
I think option A is the best choice.
upvoted 0 times
...
Latia
5 days ago
I agree with Bobbye. Option B is the way to go. S3 is reliable and Glacier Deep Archive is dirt cheap for cold storage. Plus, no need to mess with CloudWatch Logs or AWS Backup, which adds unnecessary complexity.
upvoted 0 times
...
Bobbye
7 days ago
Option B seems like the most straightforward and cost-effective solution. S3 Lifecycle policies can automatically move the logs to Glacier Deep Archive, which is perfect for long-term storage that's rarely accessed.
upvoted 0 times
Halina
13 hours ago
I agree, it's a smart way to manage storage costs while still retaining access to older logs when needed.
upvoted 0 times
...
Coletta
4 days ago
Option B sounds like a good choice. Using S3 Lifecycle policies to move logs to Glacier Deep Archive is efficient.
upvoted 0 times
...
...

Save Cancel