Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

Amazon PAS-C01 Exam - Topic 2 Question 42 Discussion

Actual exam question for Amazon's PAS-C01 exam
Question #: 42
Topic #: 2
[All PAS-C01 Questions]

A company has deployed its SAP applications into multiple Availability Zones in the same AWS Region To accommodate storage of media files database table export and import and files dropped by third-party tools the company has mounted Amazon Elastic File System (Amazon EFS) file systems between the SAP instances The company needs to retrieve the files quickly for installations updates and system refreshes

Over time the EFS file systems have grown exponentially to multiple terabytes An SAP solutions architect must optimize storage cost for the tiles that are stored in Amazon EFS.

Which solution will meet this requirement with the LEAST administrative overhead?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: C, D, F

https://docs.aws.amazon.com/whitepapers/latest/sap-on-aws-technical-deployment-guide/security.html https://docs.aws.amazon.com/whitepapers/latest/sap-on-aws-technical-deployment-guide/sap-monitoring.html


by Sheron at Sep 08, 2024, 02:13 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium PAS-C01 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Submit Cancel
Cathrine
5 months ago
Manual scanning? No thanks, that sounds like a nightmare!
upvoted 0 times
...
Mica
5 months ago
Option B sounds great for archiving, but what about access speed?
upvoted 0 times
...
Pauline
5 months ago
I’m not sure about moving to Glacier, isn’t retrieval slow?
upvoted 0 times
...
Jade
5 months ago
Definitely go with option C, least hassle!
upvoted 0 times
...
Denae
6 months ago
EFS can get pricey with multiple terabytes.
upvoted 0 times
...
Hannah
6 months ago
I recall that S3 Glacier vault lock policies are more about compliance than cost savings. I wonder if that's really necessary for this scenario. It feels like there might be simpler solutions available.
upvoted 0 times
...
Arminda
6 months ago
Applying a lifecycle policy on EFS sounds familiar. I think we talked about how it can automate moving files to Standard-IA, which might be a good balance between cost and access speed.
upvoted 0 times
...
Luisa
6 months ago
I think moving files to S3 Glacier Deep Archive could save costs, but I'm not sure about the retrieval times. We practiced a similar question about storage tiers, and I remember Glacier being slower.
upvoted 0 times
...
Malinda
6 months ago
I remember discussing the importance of minimizing manual tasks in our study group. Scanning files manually seems like a lot of work, so I doubt that's the best option here.
upvoted 0 times
...
Chantay
6 months ago
Scanning the files manually sounds like a lot of work, especially with terabytes of data. I'd probably try to automate as much of this process as possible, using tools or scripts to analyze file usage and apply the appropriate storage policies. That should minimize the administrative overhead.
upvoted 0 times
...
Laurene
6 months ago
Okay, I think I've got a plan. I'd start by applying a lifecycle policy to move the less frequently accessed files to EFS Standard-IA. That way, I can keep them readily available if needed, but at a lower cost. If there are truly cold files, then I might consider moving them to S3 Glacier as well.
upvoted 0 times
...
Corrinne
6 months ago
Hmm, I'm a bit unsure about the tradeoffs here. While moving files to Glacier or EFS Standard-IA could save money, I'm worried about the potential impact on retrieval times for critical files. I might need to do some more research on the performance characteristics of those options.
upvoted 0 times
...
Princess
7 months ago
This seems like a straightforward optimization problem. I'd probably start by looking at the file usage patterns and identifying any files that are rarely accessed. Moving those to a lower-cost storage like S3 Glacier or EFS Standard-IA could be a good way to reduce costs.
upvoted 0 times
...
Marsha
7 months ago
Hmm, I'm a bit unsure about the specific criteria I need to configure here. I'll need to review the details carefully to make sure I get this right.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tasia
11 months ago
Option A? Really? Who has time to manually sift through terabytes of files these days? I'd rather teach my dog to do it than do it myself!
upvoted 0 times
Delmy
10 months ago
D) Move the files to Amazon S3 Glacier Apply an S3 Glacier vault lock policy to the files
upvoted 0 times
...
Lea
10 months ago
C) Apply a lifecycle policy on the files in Amazon EFS to move the files to EFS Standard-Infrequent Access (Standard-IA)
upvoted 0 times
...
Isidra
10 months ago
B) Move the files to Amazon S3 Glacier Deep Archive
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Francisca
11 months ago
Option D is like bringing a sledgehammer to a screw problem. S3 Glacier and vault locks are way too complicated for this use case. Keep it simple with Option C!
upvoted 0 times
...
Whitney
11 months ago
Hmm, Option B might work, but moving everything to Glacier Deep Archive could be overkill if we need to access the files regularly. C is the better balance of cost savings and accessibility.
upvoted 0 times
...
Cristen
11 months ago
I agree, Option C is the way to go. It leverages the built-in EFS lifecycle management features, which should be easier to manage than manually moving files or setting up S3 Glacier policies.
upvoted 0 times
...
Alaine
11 months ago
Option C seems the most straightforward. Applying a lifecycle policy on the EFS files to move them to Standard-IA should reduce costs with minimal administrative overhead.
upvoted 0 times
Lucina
10 months ago
I think we should go with option C to efficiently manage the storage of the files in Amazon EFS.
upvoted 0 times
...
Nadine
10 months ago
Moving the files to Standard-IA with a lifecycle policy is a smart way to reduce costs without much manual effort.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tom
10 months ago
It's definitely the least administrative overhead solution for managing the growing EFS file systems.
upvoted 0 times
...
Vesta
10 months ago
I agree, option C seems like the best choice to optimize storage cost for the EFS files.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Raelene
1 year ago
I prefer option D. Moving the files to Amazon S3 Glacier and applying an S3 Glacier vault lock policy seems like a more secure option.
upvoted 0 times
...
Barb
1 year ago
I agree with Karma. Applying a lifecycle policy on the files in Amazon EFS to move them to EFS Standard-Infrequent Access will help optimize storage cost.
upvoted 0 times
...
Karma
1 year ago
I think option C is the best solution.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel