New Year Sale 2026! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Amazon PAS-C01 Exam - Topic 10 Question 12 Discussion

Actual exam question for Amazon's PAS-C01 exam
Question #: 12
Topic #: 10
[All PAS-C01 Questions]

A company hosts an SAP HANA database on an Amazon EC2 instance in the us-easi-1 Region. The company needs to implement a disaster recovery (DR) site in the us-west-1 Region. The company needs a cost-optimized solution that offers a guaranteed capacity reservation an RPO of less than 30 minutes and an RTO of less than 30 minutes.

When solution will meet these requirements?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: C

VPC endpoints to ensure that traffic to and from the CloudWatch and EC2 services stays within the VPC. Additionally, an IAM policy is created to grant access to only the necessary actions, such as DescribeInstances and GetMetricStatistics, for all EC2 resources. This approach will provide secure monitoring of the SAP system while maximizing security and ensuring support from both SAP and AWS.


Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Loreen
4 months ago
Wait, does preload really make that much of a difference?
upvoted 0 times
...
James
4 months ago
A could work, but shutting down QA seems risky.
upvoted 0 times
...
Marg
4 months ago
Not sure about D, sounds complicated for DR.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jennifer
4 months ago
I think C is the best choice for hot standby.
upvoted 0 times
...
Shawna
4 months ago
Option B seems solid for ongoing replication.
upvoted 0 times
...
Annalee
5 months ago
I think option B could work too, but I’m not sure if increasing the instance size during DR meets the RTO requirement effectively.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ty
5 months ago
I’m a bit confused about the differences between system replication and using CloudEndure. I feel like I need to review those concepts again.
upvoted 0 times
...
Stefany
5 months ago
Option C sounds familiar; I think it was mentioned as a hot standby solution in one of our practice questions. It might be the right choice for quick failover.
upvoted 0 times
...
Roslyn
5 months ago
I remember we discussed the importance of RPO and RTO in our last class, but I'm not entirely sure which option guarantees both under 30 minutes.
upvoted 0 times
...
Omega
5 months ago
Okay, I think I've got this. The key is to identify which statements are true about User-Based Tunneling, not just about the overall solution design.
upvoted 0 times
...
Cristen
5 months ago
Okay, let me think this through. The question is asking about a way to exclude search artifacts when creating a diag. Option D, --filter-searchstrings, sounds like it could be the right answer since it would filter out the search-related information.
upvoted 0 times
...
Melvin
5 months ago
I think this is a pretty straightforward question. The key is to focus on the specific property mentioned - "system.content.maximumFileSizeLimit". Based on the options, it seems like this property controls the maximum file size for content created in the system, but the tricky part is figuring out the exact scope of where this limit applies.
upvoted 0 times
...
Yaeko
10 months ago
I heard the company is also considering using a magic 8-ball to decide on the disaster recovery plan. Apparently, the results have been... 'Uncertain'.
upvoted 0 times
...
Clement
10 months ago
Option D looks interesting, but relying on AMIs and backups from S3 seems a bit convoluted. I'd prefer a more streamlined solution like Option A or C.
upvoted 0 times
Hildegarde
9 months ago
Yeah, Option D might be a bit complex with AMIs and backups, I think simplicity is key for a DR solution.
upvoted 0 times
...
Delsie
9 months ago
I agree, Option C also looks promising with constant replication and a hot standby for quick failover.
upvoted 0 times
...
Naomi
9 months ago
Yeah, Option D might be a bit complex with AMIs and backups, whereas A and C offer more straightforward approaches.
upvoted 0 times
...
Coral
9 months ago
I agree, Option C also looks promising with constant replication and a hot standby for quick failover in case of a disaster.
upvoted 0 times
...
Precious
9 months ago
Option A seems like a good choice for a cost-optimized solution with guaranteed capacity reservation and quick RPO/RTO.
upvoted 0 times
...
Vincent
10 months ago
Option A seems like a good choice for a cost-optimized solution with guaranteed capacity reservation and quick RPO and RTO.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Dortha
10 months ago
Option C is intriguing with the hot standby secondary HANA database, but I'm not sure if keeping the preload on is the most cost-effective approach. Maybe Option A would be a better fit overall.
upvoted 0 times
Monte
8 months ago
I agree, Option A provides a comprehensive solution for the company's requirements. It's important to consider both cost-effectiveness and efficiency in a DR plan.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rima
8 months ago
Yeah, Option A seems like a good choice for a guaranteed capacity reservation and quick RPO and RTO. It's a practical approach for disaster recovery.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ollie
8 months ago
I think Option A could be a better fit overall, as it offers a cost-optimized solution with constant replication and the ability to shut down the QA instance during DR.
upvoted 0 times
...
Krystina
8 months ago
Option C sounds good for high availability, but I agree that keeping the preload on may not be the most cost-effective choice.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lilli
8 months ago
Yes, Option A offers a guaranteed capacity reservation and meets the RPO and RTO requirements.
upvoted 0 times
...
Mary
9 months ago
I agree, Option A with constant replication and shutting down the QA instance during DR seems efficient.
upvoted 0 times
...
Serina
9 months ago
Option A seems like a good choice for a cost-optimized solution.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dianne
10 months ago
I think Option A could work well for your situation.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Esteban
10 months ago
I'm not convinced that Option B is the best choice here. Using CloudEndure for replication might add an unnecessary layer of complexity, and increasing the instance size during DR might be a bit of a hassle.
upvoted 0 times
...
Chauncey
10 months ago
Option A seems like a good choice, as it offers a cost-optimized solution with a guaranteed capacity reservation and the required RPO and RTO. The constant replication using SAP HANA system replication is a solid approach.
upvoted 0 times
Dick
9 months ago
I agree, having the secondary database instance in us-west-1 for QA and production purposes makes it a comprehensive DR solution.
upvoted 0 times
...
Mireya
10 months ago
Option A seems like a good choice, as it offers a cost-optimized solution with a guaranteed capacity reservation and the required RPO and RTO. The constant replication using SAP HANA system replication is a solid approach.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Kaycee
10 months ago
I'm leaning towards option D because it involves creating an AMI for easy recovery during a disaster.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ashley
11 months ago
I disagree, I believe option C is better as it keeps the secondary database as a hot standby for quick failover.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lawrence
11 months ago
I think option A could work because it involves constant replication and seems cost-effective.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel