Amazon MLS-C01 Exam - Topic 5 Question 71 Discussion

Actual exam question for Amazon's MLS-C01 exam

Question #: 71
Topic #: 5

An ecommerce company has used Amazon SageMaker to deploy a factorization machines (FM) model to suggest products for customers. The company's data science team has developed two new models by using the TensorFlow and PyTorch deep learning frameworks. The company needs to use A/B testing to evaluate the new models against the deployed model.

...required A/B testing setup is as follows:

* Send 70% of traffic to the FM model, 15% of traffic to the TensorFlow model, and 15% of traffic to the Py Torch model.

* For customers who are from Europe, send all traffic to the TensorFlow model

..sh architecture can the company use to implement the required A/B testing setup?

ACreate two new SageMaker endpoints for the TensorFlow and PyTorch models in addition to the existing SageMaker endpoint. Create an Application Load Balancer Create a target group for each endpoint. Configure listener rules and add weight to the target groups. To send traffic to the TensorFlow model for customers who are from Europe, create an additional listener rule to forward traffic to the TensorFlow target group.

BCreate two production variants for the TensorFlow and PyTorch models. Create an auto scaling policy and configure the desired A/B weights to direct traffic to each production variant Update the existing SageMaker endpoint with the auto scaling policy. To send traffic to the TensorFlow model for customers who are from Europe, set the TargetVariant header in the request to point to the variant name of the TensorFlow model.

CCreate two new SageMaker endpoints for the TensorFlow and PyTorch models in addition to the existing SageMaker endpoint. Create a Network Load Balancer. Create a target group for each endpoint. Configure listener rules and add weight to the target groups. To send traffic to the TensorFlow model for customers who are from Europe, create an additional listener rule to forward traffic to the TensorFlow target group.

DCreate two production variants for the TensorFlow and PyTorch models. Specify the weight for each production variant in the SageMaker endpoint configuration. Update the existing SageMaker endpoint with the new configuration. To send traffic to the TensorFlow model for customers who are from Europe, set the TargetVariant header in the request to point to the variant name of the TensorFlow model.

Show Suggested Answer

Suggested Answer: A

by Donette at Mar 01, 2023, 08:18 PM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium MLS-C01 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel

Terina

5 months ago

Option D seems too complicated for what they need.

upvoted 0 times

...

Latosha

6 months ago

Wow, sending all European traffic to TensorFlow? Bold move!

upvoted 0 times

...

Elvis

6 months ago

Not sure about using a Network Load Balancer in option C.

upvoted 0 times

...

Ora

6 months ago

I think option B makes the most sense for traffic management.

upvoted 0 times

...

Barb

6 months ago

A/B testing is crucial for model evaluation!

upvoted 0 times

...

Francoise

6 months ago

I feel like option D is the right choice because it mentions updating the existing endpoint, which seems efficient for managing traffic.

upvoted 0 times

...

Sylvie

6 months ago

I practiced a similar question where we had to set weights for different models, but I can't recall if we used a Network Load Balancer or not.

upvoted 0 times

...

Alease

6 months ago

I'm not entirely sure, but I think using an Application Load Balancer is more common for this kind of traffic distribution. That makes me lean towards option A.

upvoted 0 times

...

Mireya

6 months ago

I remember we discussed using production variants in SageMaker for A/B testing, so option B and D seem familiar to me.

upvoted 0 times

...

Mignon

7 months ago

Okay, let me think this through. I know Joint Commission accreditation is voluntary, not required. But I'm not sure about the specifics around state licensure and reimbursement, so I'll need to carefully consider each option.

upvoted 0 times

...

Georgiann

7 months ago

I think I remember that it's really important for employees selling these products to receive specialized training, so I'm not sure about option B.

upvoted 0 times

...

Stefany

7 months ago

Key strategy: Look for words like 'running count' and 'how much should be on hand' - that points directly to perpetual inventory tracking.

upvoted 0 times

...

Derick

7 months ago

I've got this! The key is understanding the Cisco ACI integration with UCS. vPC+ and LACP active mode are the way to go for load balancing.

upvoted 0 times

...

Keena

12 months ago

I hope the A/B testing doesn't turn into an 'Eh, B?' situation.

upvoted 0 times

Adelle

10 months ago

A) Create two new SageMaker endpoints for the TensorFlow and PyTorch models in addition to the existing SageMaker endpoint. Create an Application Load Balancer Create a target group for each endpoint. Configure listener rules and add weight to the target groups. To send traffic to the TensorFlow model for customers who are from Europe, create an additional listener rule to forward traffic to the TensorFlow target group.

upvoted 0 times

...

Luz

11 months ago

B) Create two production variants for the TensorFlow and PyTorch models. Create an auto scaling policy and configure the desired A/B weights to direct traffic to each production variant Update the existing SageMaker endpoint with the auto scaling policy. To send traffic to the TensorFlow model for customers who are from Europe, set the TargetVariant header in the request to point to the variant name of the TensorFlow model.

upvoted 0 times

...

Emmanuel

11 months ago

upvoted 0 times

...

Elin

12 months ago

I can't wait to see which model is the 'Tensor-Flop' and which one is the 'Py-Tortoise'.

upvoted 0 times

...

Zoila

12 months ago

Option D is a bit more manual, but it might be the simplest way to implement the required A/B testing setup. Setting the TargetVariant header is a clever way to handle the Europe-specific traffic.

upvoted 0 times

Katy

10 months ago

It might be a bit manual, but it seems like the simplest option.

upvoted 0 times

...

Lorrine

11 months ago

Yeah, setting the TargetVariant header for Europe-specific traffic is a smart move.

upvoted 0 times

...

Gregoria

11 months ago

I think option D is the way to go for the A/B testing setup.

upvoted 0 times

...

Nan

1 year ago

Option C is similar to A, but using a Network Load Balancer instead. I'm not sure if that's necessary for this setup, but it could be a valid choice.

upvoted 0 times

Danica

12 months ago

I think using a Network Load Balancer might provide better scalability and reliability for handling the traffic distribution.

upvoted 0 times

...

Azalee

12 months ago

Option C is similar to A, but using a Network Load Balancer instead. I'm not sure if that's necessary for this setup, but it could be a valid choice.

upvoted 0 times

...

Ciara

1 year ago

Option B is an interesting approach, using production variants and auto-scaling. This could provide more flexibility in the future, but might be overkill for this use case.

upvoted 0 times

...

Ria

1 year ago

Option B allows for auto scaling and setting A/B weights easily, which can be more efficient in the long run.

upvoted 0 times

...

Kimi

1 year ago

Option A seems like the most straightforward approach. Using an Application Load Balancer and creating separate target groups for each model makes it easy to configure the traffic distribution.

upvoted 0 times