Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Amazon Exam MLS-C01 Topic 1 Question 123 Discussion

Actual exam question for Amazon's MLS-C01 exam
Question #: 123
Topic #: 1
[All MLS-C01 Questions]

[Exploratory Data Analysis]

A Machine Learning Specialist is deciding between building a naive Bayesian model or a full Bayesian network for a classification problem. The Specialist computes the Pearson correlation coefficients between each feature and finds that their absolute values range between 0.1 to 0.95.

Which model describes the underlying data in this situation?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: D

Contribute your Thoughts:

Salley
2 hours ago
I'm pretty confident that the answer is D. A full Bayesian network should be used since the features have varying degrees of correlation, indicating they are not all conditionally independent.
upvoted 0 times
...
Bobbye
6 days ago
Okay, let me think this through. If some of the features are dependent, then a full Bayesian network would be the better choice to model those relationships. The key is that the question mentions the Pearson correlations, which indicate statistical dependence between the features.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rory
11 days ago
I'm a bit confused here. If the features are conditionally independent, then a naive Bayesian model should work, right? But the question says some of the features are dependent, so I'm not sure which model to choose.
upvoted 0 times
...
Farrah
17 days ago
Hmm, the Pearson correlation coefficients range from 0.1 to 0.95, so that suggests some of the features are dependent. I think a full Bayesian network might be better to capture those dependencies.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel