Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Amazon MLA-C01 Exam - Topic 4 Question 24 Discussion

An ML engineer decides to use Amazon SageMaker AI automated model tuning (AMT) for hyperparameter optimization (HPO). The ML engineer requires a tuning strategy that uses regression to slowly and sequentially select the next set of hyperparameters based on previous runs. The strategy must work across small hyperparameter ranges.Which solution will meet these requirements?
C) Bayesian optimization
A) Grid search
B) Random search
D) Hyperband

Amazon MLA-C01 Exam - Topic 4 Question 24 Discussion

Actual exam question for Amazon's MLA-C01 exam
Question #: 24
Topic #: 4
[All MLA-C01 Questions]

An ML engineer decides to use Amazon SageMaker AI automated model tuning (AMT) for hyperparameter optimization (HPO). The ML engineer requires a tuning strategy that uses regression to slowly and sequentially select the next set of hyperparameters based on previous runs. The strategy must work across small hyperparameter ranges.

Which solution will meet these requirements?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: C

Amazon SageMaker Automated Model Tuning supports several hyperparameter search strategies. Bayesian optimization is explicitly designed to model the relationship between hyperparameters and objective metrics using regression techniques. Based on results from previous training jobs, Bayesian optimization predicts which hyperparameter combinations are most likely to improve model performance and evaluates those next.

AWS documentation highlights Bayesian optimization as the preferred strategy when the hyperparameter search space is small to medium and when training jobs are expensive. Because the algorithm learns from prior runs, it avoids wasting resources on unpromising configurations and converges efficiently.

Grid search exhaustively evaluates all combinations and becomes inefficient even with moderately sized search spaces. Random search does not use information from prior runs and is less efficient. Hyperband focuses on aggressive early stopping and resource allocation, not regression-based sequential selection.

Therefore, Option C is the correct and AWS-verified solution.


Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Deandrea
3 days ago
I’m not convinced that C is the best choice for small ranges.
upvoted 0 times
...
Louisa
8 days ago
Wait, isn't Bayesian optimization more complex than the others?
upvoted 0 times
...
Estrella
13 days ago
Totally agree with C! It adapts based on previous results.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rebeca
19 days ago
I think A) Grid search could work too, but it's not efficient.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ezekiel
24 days ago
C) Bayesian optimization is the way to go!
upvoted 0 times
...
Socorro
29 days ago
Hyperband sounds familiar, but I don't think it focuses on regression like the question asks. I lean towards Bayesian optimization as well.
upvoted 0 times
...
Oren
1 month ago
I recall that Bayesian optimization is specifically designed for small ranges and sequential tuning, so it could fit the bill.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ivory
1 month ago
I'm not entirely sure, but I remember practicing with grid search and random search. They seem less efficient for this scenario.
upvoted 0 times
...
Miles
1 month ago
I think Bayesian optimization might be the right choice here since it uses previous results to inform future hyperparameter selections.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel