Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Amazon MLA-C01 Exam - Topic 2 Question 22 Discussion

A company has used Amazon SageMaker to deploy a predictive ML model in production. The company is using SageMaker Model Monitor on the model. After a model update, an ML engineer notices data quality issues in the Model Monitor checks.What should the ML engineer do to mitigate the data quality issues that Model Monitor has identified?
C) Create a new baseline from the latest dataset. Update Model Monitor to use the new baseline for evaluations.
A) Adjust the model's parameters and hyperparameters.
B) Initiate a manual Model Monitor job that uses the most recent production data.
D) Include additional data in the existing training set for the model. Retrain and redeploy the model.

Amazon MLA-C01 Exam - Topic 2 Question 22 Discussion

Actual exam question for Amazon's MLA-C01 exam
Question #: 22
Topic #: 2
[All MLA-C01 Questions]

A company has used Amazon SageMaker to deploy a predictive ML model in production. The company is using SageMaker Model Monitor on the model. After a model update, an ML engineer notices data quality issues in the Model Monitor checks.

What should the ML engineer do to mitigate the data quality issues that Model Monitor has identified?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: C

When Model Monitor identifies data quality issues, it might be due to a shift in the data distribution compared to the original baseline. By creating a new baseline using the most recent production data and updating Model Monitor to evaluate against this baseline, the ML engineer ensures that the monitoring is aligned with the current data patterns. This approach mitigates false positives and reflects the updated data characteristics without immediately retraining the model.


Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
True, but it might not solve the root cause.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rolland
5 days ago
But what about option B? A manual job could clarify issues.
upvoted 0 times
...
Brandon
10 days ago
Agreed! Updating the baseline helps with accuracy.
upvoted 0 times
...
Destiny
15 days ago
I think option C is the best choice. New baseline is crucial.
upvoted 0 times
...
Alonzo
21 days ago
Manual Model Monitor jobs can be super helpful too!
upvoted 0 times
...
Valene
26 days ago
Wait, can you really just adjust hyperparameters to fix data quality?
upvoted 0 times
...
Alana
1 month ago
Not sure if just updating the baseline is enough, though.
upvoted 0 times
...
Elmer
1 month ago
Totally agree, option C makes the most sense!
upvoted 0 times
...
Miriam
1 month ago
I think creating a new baseline is key here.
upvoted 0 times
...
Leatha
2 months ago
Adding more data (D) could help, but it depends on the quality of that data.
upvoted 0 times
...
Malcolm
2 months ago
Wait, can you really just update the baseline like that? Sounds too easy!
upvoted 0 times
...
Lezlie
2 months ago
Adjusting parameters won't fix data quality issues, right?
upvoted 0 times
...
Winifred
2 months ago
Disagree, I’d go with B. Manual checks are super important.
upvoted 0 times
...
Bobbye
2 months ago
I think option C makes the most sense. New baseline is key!
upvoted 0 times
...
Valentine
2 months ago
I practiced a similar question where updating the baseline was the right answer, so I’m leaning towards option C here.
upvoted 0 times
...
Clement
3 months ago
I feel like adjusting parameters could be a quick fix, but it doesn't really address the data quality concerns directly.
upvoted 0 times
...
Domingo
3 months ago
I think initiating a manual Model Monitor job is a good way to check the most recent data, but it might not solve the underlying issues.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ciara
3 months ago
I remember we discussed how creating a new baseline could help address data quality issues, but I'm not entirely sure if that's the only step needed.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel