Amazon Exam DVA-C02 Topic 2 Question 40 Discussion

Actual exam question for Amazon's DVA-C02 exam

Question #: 40
Topic #: 2

A developer is creating an AWS Lambda function that consumes messages from an Amazon Simple Queue Service (Amazon SQS) standard queue. The developer notices that the Lambda function processes some messages multiple times.

How should developer resolve this issue MOST cost-effectively?

AChange the Amazon SQS standard queue to an Amazon SQS FIFO queue by using the Amazon SQS message deduplication ID.

BSet up a dead-letter queue.

CSet the maximum concurrency limit of the AWS Lambda function to 1

DChange the message processing to use Amazon Kinesis Data Streams instead of Amazon SQS.

Show Suggested Answer

Suggested Answer: D

AWS Secrets Manager:Built for managing secrets, providing encryption, automatic rotation, and access control.

Customer Master Key (CMK):Provides an extra layer of control over encryption through AWS KMS.

Automatic Rotation:Enhances security by regularly changing the secret.

User Data Script:Allows secrets retrieval at instance startup and sets them as environment variables for seamless use within the application.

AWS Secrets Manager Documentation:https://docs.aws.amazon.com/secretsmanager/

AWS KMS Documentation:https://docs.aws.amazon.com/kms/

User Data for EC2 Instances:https://docs.aws.amazon.com/AWSEC2/latest/UserGuide/user-data.html

by Adell at Sep 15, 2024, 09:21 PM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium DVA-C02 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel

Ashton

21 days ago

Option A: 'Change the queue type? Ain't nobody got time for that!' (in a humorous tone)

upvoted 0 times

Beula

1 days ago

B: Set up a dead-letter queue.

upvoted 0 times

...

Winfred

2 days ago

A: Change the queue type? Ain't nobody got time for that! (in a humorous tone)

upvoted 0 times

...

Renea

26 days ago

Option D is an interesting idea, but using Kinesis Data Streams might be overkill for this use case. It could end up being more complex and expensive than necessary.

upvoted 0 times

...

Bobbye

29 days ago

Limiting the concurrency to 1 in Option C might work, but it could impact the overall performance of the Lambda function. I'm not sure if it's the best approach.

upvoted 0 times

Skye

7 days ago

B: Setting up a dead-letter queue could also help in handling the duplicate messages.

upvoted 0 times

...

Deeanna

9 days ago

A: I think changing the Amazon SQS standard queue to an Amazon SQS FIFO queue with deduplication ID might be the best solution.

upvoted 0 times

...

Lizbeth

1 months ago

I like the idea of setting up a dead-letter queue in Option B. That way we can identify and re-process the problematic messages.

upvoted 0 times

Dominque

16 days ago

Let's go with Option B then. It seems like the most practical solution for our problem.

upvoted 0 times

...

Isaac

20 days ago

I agree, setting up a dead-letter queue is a cost-effective way to handle these issues.

upvoted 0 times

...

Phuong

22 days ago

I agree, setting up a dead-letter queue is a cost-effective way to handle the issue.

upvoted 0 times

...

Brandon

27 days ago

Option B sounds like a good solution. It will help us identify and re-process problematic messages.

upvoted 0 times

...

Kayleigh

1 months ago

Option B sounds like a good solution. We can easily identify and re-process problematic messages.

upvoted 0 times

...

Brett

2 months ago

But wouldn't setting the maximum concurrency limit of the Lambda function to 1 be a more cost-effective solution?

upvoted 0 times

...

Annabelle

2 months ago

Option A seems like the easiest solution, but I'm not sure if it's the most cost-effective. FIFO queues can be more expensive than standard queues.

upvoted 0 times

Basilia

23 days ago

B: That's a good point, but changing the Amazon SQS standard queue to a FIFO queue with deduplication ID might be more cost-effective in the long run.

upvoted 0 times

...