New Year Sale 2026! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

Amazon CLF-C02 Exam - Topic 3 Question 34 Discussion

Actual exam question for Amazon's CLF-C02 exam
Question #: 34
Topic #: 3
[All CLF-C02 Questions]

A company needs to store infrequently used data for data archives and long-term backups.

Which AWS service or storage class will meet these requirements MOST cost-effectively?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: D

Amazon S3 Glacier Flexible Retrieval is optimized for storing infrequently accessed data at a very low cost, making it suitable for data archiving and long-term backups. It provides flexible retrieval options for archived data. Other services like FSx for Lustre, EBS, and EFS are more suited for frequently accessed data and higher-performance use cases, not archival storage.


by Deeanna at Nov 13, 2024, 11:25 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium CLF-C02 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Submit Cancel
Arlie
3 months ago
Wait, is Glacier really that cost-effective? I had my doubts!
upvoted 0 times
...
Shantay
3 months ago
EFS seems too expensive for this use case.
upvoted 0 times
...
Cletus
3 months ago
I thought EBS was better for backups, but maybe not for infrequent access?
upvoted 0 times
...
Rasheeda
4 months ago
Definitely agree, Glacier is the way to go for archives.
upvoted 0 times
...
Valentine
4 months ago
S3 Glacier is super cheap for long-term storage!
upvoted 0 times
...
Francine
4 months ago
I have a feeling that S3 Glacier is the best option here, but I need to double-check the retrieval costs.
upvoted 0 times
...
Fausto
4 months ago
I practiced a question similar to this, and I believe EFS is more for shared file systems, not really for archiving.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rory
4 months ago
I'm not entirely sure, but I remember something about EBS being more for active data rather than archives.
upvoted 0 times
...
Elsa
5 months ago
I think S3 Glacier might be the right choice since it's designed for long-term storage and is cost-effective for infrequent access.
upvoted 0 times
...
Eve
5 months ago
I think Amazon S3 Glacier Flexible Retrieval is the most cost-effective option here. The low storage costs and flexible retrieval options make it well-suited for this scenario.
upvoted 0 times
...
Norah
5 months ago
Based on the requirements, I'm leaning towards Amazon S3 Glacier Flexible Retrieval. It seems designed for long-term, infrequent data storage.
upvoted 0 times
...
Billy
5 months ago
I'm a bit confused on the differences between the storage options. I'll need to refresh my knowledge on the key features of each service.
upvoted 0 times
...
Malinda
5 months ago
Amazon S3 Glacier Flexible Retrieval sounds like it could be a good fit for this use case. I'll need to review the pricing and retrieval options to be sure.
upvoted 0 times
...
Maddie
5 months ago
Hmm, this one seems tricky. I'll need to think carefully about the requirements of infrequent data storage and long-term backups.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kirk
1 year ago
D all the way! You know what they say, 'Glacier's the word, it's better, believe me.'
upvoted 0 times
Frederic
1 year ago
User 4: Glacier's flexibility in retrieval options makes it a great choice for data archives.
upvoted 0 times
...
Chun
1 year ago
User 3: Definitely, it's cost-effective and perfect for infrequently used data.
upvoted 0 times
...
Loren
1 year ago
User 2: I agree, Glacier is the best option for long-term backups.
upvoted 0 times
...
Huey
1 year ago
User 1: D all the way!
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Major
1 year ago
I'm not sure, but I think A) Amazon FSx for Lustre could also be a good option for storing infrequently used data.
upvoted 0 times
...
Mica
1 year ago
Hold up, are we talking about storing data or creating a glacier? Because if it's the latter, I've got some ice sculptures I'd like to submit.
upvoted 0 times
...
Shawnda
1 year ago
I agree with Beatriz. S3 Glacier is designed for infrequently accessed data and is cost-effective.
upvoted 0 times
...
Catarina
1 year ago
I was thinking Amazon EFS, but then I remembered that's more for file-based workloads. For infrequently used data, Glacier is the clear winner here.
upvoted 0 times
Rex
1 year ago
Yes, Glacier is the ideal solution for storing data that is rarely accessed.
upvoted 0 times
...
Loreen
1 year ago
Glacier is designed for long-term storage and is perfect for infrequently accessed data.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kiley
1 year ago
I think Amazon S3 Glacier Flexible Retrieval would be the most cost-effective choice for data archives and long-term backups.
upvoted 0 times
...
Erick
1 year ago
I agree, Amazon EFS is not the best option for infrequently used data.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Dominga
1 year ago
Definitely gotta go with D. Glacier Flexible Retrieval is the way to go for long-term archiving and backups. It's super cost-effective and reliable.
upvoted 0 times
Bev
1 year ago
I think D is the most cost-effective choice for storing infrequently used data.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lenna
1 year ago
Glacier Flexible Retrieval is definitely cost-effective and reliable.
upvoted 0 times
...
Luisa
1 year ago
I agree, D is the best option for long-term archiving and backups.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Beatriz
1 year ago
I think D) Amazon S3 Glacier Flexible Retrieval would be the best option for long-term backups.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel