MENU
A company has deployed applications on Amazon EC2 instances. The company needs to assess application vulnerabilities and must identify infrastructure deployments that do not meet best practices. Which AWS service can the company use to meet these requirements?
Suggested Answer: B
Get Premium CLF-C02 Questions
as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF
Real Exam Format
Detailed Explanations
Instant Access
Get Your Practice Test
41 comments · newest first
TA
Tammy
11 months ago
I disagree, Trusted Advisor gives a broader overview, but Inspector is more specific.
WI
Willetta
11 months ago
I’m surprised, I always thought GuardDuty was for security threats only.
CO
Corinne
11 months ago
No way, it's AWS Config that tracks compliance!
AR
Arminda
11 months ago
I thought AWS Trusted Advisor was the go-to for best practices?
MA
Mari
12 months ago
Definitely Amazon Inspector for vulnerability assessments!
LA
Lashaunda
12 months ago
I’m leaning towards Amazon Inspector because it seems to fit the need for vulnerability assessment, but I need to double-check my notes on that.
MA
Mattie
1 year ago
I feel like AWS Config could be relevant too, as it tracks compliance, but it doesn't directly assess vulnerabilities like the others.
BA
Barrett
1 year ago
I remember practicing a question about AWS services, and I think AWS Trusted Advisor was mentioned for best practices, but I don't know if it covers vulnerabilities specifically.
FL
Flo
1 year ago
I think Amazon Inspector might be the right choice since it focuses on assessing application vulnerabilities, but I'm not entirely sure.
MI
Mignon
1 year ago
Based on the question, I believe Amazon Inspector is the service that can meet the company's needs. It's specifically focused on vulnerability assessment and identifying non-compliant infrastructure.
OL
Olene
1 year ago
I'm a bit confused on the differences between AWS Trusted Advisor, AWS Config, and Amazon Inspector. I'll need to read the descriptions more carefully to determine the best option.
JO
Jose
1 year ago
Amazon Inspector sounds like the right choice here. It's designed for vulnerability assessment and can identify issues in your infrastructure deployments.
LO
Loreta
1 year ago
Hmm, I'm not entirely sure about this one. I'll need to review the differences between the AWS security services to decide which one is the best fit for the requirements.
MI
Mireya
1 year ago
This one seems straightforward. I think Amazon Inspector is the service that can help assess application vulnerabilities and identify infrastructure that doesn't meet best practices.
YO
Yolande
1 year ago
Hmm, I'm a bit unsure about this one. I'll need to review the SSL/TLS concepts to make sure I understand the right approach.
HU
Huey
1 year ago
This is a classic variance analysis problem. I'll need to carefully examine the data, identify the relevant variances, and then select the two that best explain the difference between the flexible budget profit and the actual profit.
VE
Vernice
1 year ago
I'm a bit confused on the differences between the email account types. I'll need to review that before answering.
TE
Tenesha
1 year ago
Okay, let me walk through this step-by-step. If no global IPv6 addresses are assigned, the router will use the link-local prefix fe80::/64. But the question is asking about the routing table, so the answer must be the more specific fe80::/10 route.
XO
Xochitl
2 years ago
You know, if they really wanted to assess vulnerabilities, they should just let me hack in. I'd find all the issues in no time!
DE
Delmy
2 years ago
Inspector? More like 'Inspector Gadget' am I right? *wink wink*
KE
Kent
2 years ago
Inspector, hands down. It's like having a virtual security expert constantly scanning your environment. Definitely the way to go.
MA
Madalyn
2 years ago
Trusted Advisor is a useful tool, but it's more focused on cost optimization than security assessment. Inspector or Config are the clear winners here.
RO
Rosio
2 years ago
AWSConfig is more for monitoring and managing configurations, whereas Inspector is better suited for security assessments.
DO
Dortha
2 years ago
What about AWSConfig? Could that also be a good option?
CL
Clorinda
2 years ago
I agree, Inspector is designed specifically for security assessments.
HU
Hubert
2 years ago
I think Amazon Inspector would be the best choice for assessing application vulnerabilities.
DA
Daryl
2 years ago
GuardDuty is great for detecting threats, but I don't think it's the best fit for this use case. I'd go with Inspector or Config.
CR
Cristy
2 years ago
AWSConfig seems like a good option too. It can help you assess your infrastructure compliance with best practices.
SH
Sherell
2 years ago
AWSConfig can also help with identifying infrastructure deployments that do not meet best practices.
HE
Helene
2 years ago
I agree, Amazon Inspector is a great tool for identifying security issues in your EC2 instances.
CA
Casie
2 years ago
AWSConfig seems like a good option too. It can help you assess your infrastructure compliance with best practices.
RO
Rocco
2 years ago
I think Amazon Inspector would be the best choice for assessing application vulnerabilities.
JI
Jina
2 years ago
I agree, Amazon Inspector is a great tool for identifying security issues in your EC2 instances.
IS
Isadora
2 years ago
I think Amazon Inspector would be the best choice for assessing application vulnerabilities.
AR
Arthur
2 years ago
I think D) Amazon GuardDuty is the best option for this scenario.
LO
Lottie
2 years ago
I think Amazon Inspector is the way to go here. It's designed specifically for identifying security vulnerabilities in your infrastructure.
ER
Erasmo
2 years ago
I think AWS Trusted Advisor could also be helpful in identifying infrastructure deployments that do not meet best practices.
KA
Karina
2 years ago
I agree, Amazon Inspector is a great choice for assessing application vulnerabilities.
MI
Mireya
2 years ago
I think C) AWSConfig could also be a possible solution.
RE
Rebeca
2 years ago
I disagree, I believe the correct answer is A) AWS Trusted Advisor.
ST
Steffanie
2 years ago
I think the answer is B) Amazon Inspector.