Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

Amazon BDS-C00 Exam - Topic 9 Question 96 Discussion

A company has several teams of analytics. Each team of analysts has their own cluster. The teams need to run SQL queries using Hive, Spark-SQL and Presto with Amazon EMR. The company needs to enable a centralized metadata layer to expose the Amazon S3 objects as tables to the analysts.Which approach meets the requirement for a centralized metadata layer?
C) s3distcp with the outputManifest option to generate RDS DDL
A) EMRFS consistent view with a common Amazon DynamoDB table
B) Bootstrap action to change the Hive Metastore to an Amazon RDS database
D) naming scheme support with automatic partition discovery from Amazon S3

Amazon BDS-C00 Exam - Topic 9 Question 96 Discussion

Actual exam question for Amazon's BDS-C00 exam
Question #: 96
Topic #: 9
[All BDS-C00 Questions]

A company has several teams of analytics. Each team of analysts has their own cluster. The teams need to run SQL queries using Hive, Spark-SQL and Presto with Amazon EMR. The company needs to enable a centralized metadata layer to expose the Amazon S3 objects as tables to the analysts.

Which approach meets the requirement for a centralized metadata layer?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: C

by Pansy at Jul 03, 2024, 02:51 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium BDS-C00 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Submit Cancel
Felicitas
8 months ago
D seems interesting, but not sure if it meets all requirements.
upvoted 0 times
...
Novella
8 months ago
Wait, can we really use DynamoDB for this? Sounds odd.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jody
8 months ago
I thought B could work too, but maybe not as well as A.
upvoted 0 times
...
Stephen
8 months ago
Totally agree, A makes the most sense here!
upvoted 0 times
...
Lawana
9 months ago
A is the best choice for a centralized metadata layer.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rodney
9 months ago
I vaguely remember something about naming schemes and partition discovery in S3, but I’m not confident if that’s the right approach for a centralized metadata layer.
upvoted 0 times
...
Judy
9 months ago
I feel like s3distcp was mentioned in our study sessions, but I’m uncertain about how the outputManifest option fits into this scenario.
upvoted 0 times
...
Brock
9 months ago
I think option B sounds familiar; changing the Hive Metastore to RDS was something we practiced, but I can't recall if it was the best choice for centralization.
upvoted 0 times
...
Micah
9 months ago
I remember we discussed using EMRFS for consistent views, but I'm not entirely sure how it integrates with DynamoDB for metadata.
upvoted 0 times
...
Janet
9 months ago
I'm leaning towards Option D with the automatic partition discovery from S3. That seems like it would be the most scalable and flexible approach for exposing the S3 objects as tables.
upvoted 0 times
...
Mona
9 months ago
Option A with the EMRFS consistent view and a common DynamoDB table sounds like a good fit. That would provide a consistent way for the different teams to access the metadata across their clusters.
upvoted 0 times
...
Stanton
9 months ago
Hmm, I'm a bit confused by the different options here. I'll need to think through the pros and cons of each approach to determine which one is the most suitable for a centralized metadata layer.
upvoted 0 times
...
Leota
10 months ago
This seems like a straightforward question about setting up a centralized metadata layer. I think the key is to find the approach that best meets the requirement of exposing the Amazon S3 objects as tables to the analysts.
upvoted 0 times
...
Felicidad
10 months ago
Okay, I remember learning about this in class. I believe the key is that ISO 26000 is a guidance standard, not a certification standard like ISO 9001 or 14001. So the answer is C.
upvoted 0 times
...
Idella
10 months ago
I'm leaning towards unit testing as the most effective option. Thorough unit testing can catch a lot of defects early in the development process before they propagate further. The other testing approaches are important too, but unit testing is really the foundation.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tien
1 year ago
Ah, the age-old battle of centralized metadata versus distributed metadata. It's like trying to herd cats - you just never know which way they're going to go.
upvoted 0 times
...
Art
1 year ago
You know, if they really want to get creative, they could try creating a centralized metadata layer using interpretive dance and semaphore flags. That would definitely be a unique approach!
upvoted 0 times
Rima
1 year ago
Yeah, I think that option would provide the necessary centralized metadata layer while still being practical and efficient.
upvoted 0 times
...
Denae
1 year ago
I think option A) EMRFS consistent view with a common Amazon DynamoDB table would be the best approach for a centralized metadata layer.
upvoted 0 times
...
Shaun
1 year ago
I agree, it's definitely a unique approach, but I think we should stick to more traditional methods for this task.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jose
1 year ago
That's an interesting idea, but I don't think interpretive dance and semaphore flags would work for creating a centralized metadata layer.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Carissa
1 year ago
The naming scheme support with automatic partition discovery from Amazon S3 sounds like a convenient solution, but I'm not sure if it would offer the same level of control and consistency as the EMRFS approach.
upvoted 0 times
...
Shawnee
1 year ago
s3distcp with the outputManifest option to generate RDS DDL seems like an interesting approach, but I'm not sure if it would provide the same level of centralization as the EMRFS consistent view.
upvoted 0 times
Coral
1 year ago
C) s3distcp with the outputManifest option to generate RDS DDL
upvoted 0 times
...
Jeanice
1 year ago
B) Bootstrap action to change the Hive Metastore to an Amazon RDS database
upvoted 0 times
...
Gerald
1 year ago
A) EMRFS consistent view with a common Amazon DynamoDB table
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Marva
1 year ago
Bootstrapping the Hive Metastore to an Amazon RDS database could also work, but it might add more complexity to the setup and maintenance.
upvoted 0 times
Lai
1 year ago
D) naming scheme support with automatic partition discovery from Amazon S3
upvoted 0 times
...
Lacresha
1 year ago
B) Bootstrap action to change the Hive Metastore to an Amazon RDS database
upvoted 0 times
...
Myra
1 year ago
A) EMRFS consistent view with a common Amazon DynamoDB table
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Barrie
1 year ago
The use of EMRFS consistent view with a common Amazon DynamoDB table seems like a straightforward approach to meet the requirement for a centralized metadata layer. It should provide a consistent view of the Amazon S3 objects across the different teams.
upvoted 0 times
Willis
1 year ago
I agree, it would make it easier for all teams to access the data
upvoted 0 times
...
Isreal
1 year ago
That sounds like a good solution for centralized metadata
upvoted 0 times
...
Arthur
1 year ago
A) EMRFS consistent view with a common Amazon DynamoDB table
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Barrett
1 year ago
But wouldn't using a common DynamoDB table provide a more centralized metadata layer for the analysts to access?
upvoted 0 times
...
Melissia
1 year ago
I disagree, I believe option D) naming scheme support with automatic partition discovery from Amazon S3 is more efficient.
upvoted 0 times
...
Barrett
1 year ago
I think option A) EMRFS consistent view with a common Amazon DynamoDB table is the best approach.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel