Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Amazon Exam ANS-C01 Topic 5 Question 40 Discussion

Actual exam question for Amazon's ANS-C01 exam
Question #: 40
Topic #: 5
[All ANS-C01 Questions]

A real estate company is building an internal application so that real estate agents can upload photos and videos of various properties. The application will store these photos and videos in an Amazon S3 bucket as objects and will use Amazon DynamoDB to store corresponding metadat

a. The S3 bucket will be configured to publish all PUT events for new object uploads to an Amazon Simple Queue Service (Amazon SQS) queue.

A compute cluster of Amazon EC2 instances will poll the SQS queue to find out about newly uploaded objects. The cluster will retrieve new objects, perform proprietary image and video recognition and classification update metadata in DynamoDB and replace the objects with new watermarked objects. The company does not want public IP addresses on the EC2 instances.

Which networking design solution will meet these requirements MOST cost-effectively as application usage increases?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer

Contribute your Thoughts:

Viva
22 days ago
Wait, so we're building a real estate app and the company doesn't want public IP addresses? Sounds like they're trying to keep their agents' secret hideouts a secret. Option C is the way to go, for sure!
upvoted 0 times
Deja
3 days ago
I agree, Option C seems like the best choice to keep everything secure.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Juan
1 months ago
Option A is an interesting choice, but I'm not sure I'd want to expose my EC2 instances to the public internet, even if I disable the public IP option. Gotta keep those servers safe and secure, you know?
upvoted 0 times
Hershel
1 days ago
User 3: Option C also seems like a secure solution with VPC endpoints for SQS, S3, and DynamoDB. It's important to keep the data protected.
upvoted 0 times
...
Fabiola
20 days ago
User 2: I agree, having a NAT gateway in a public subnet for outbound internet access seems like a good idea.
upvoted 0 times
...
Altha
22 days ago
User 1: Option B sounds like a better choice. Keeping the EC2 instances in a private subnet adds an extra layer of security.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Lavera
1 months ago
Haha, I remember my first time taking a cloud certification exam. All these networking options can be a bit overwhelming, but I think Option B is the way to go. It's a classic setup that should work well for this use case.
upvoted 0 times
Aide
7 days ago
I agree, Option B seems like the most secure choice for this scenario.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Leota
2 months ago
I'm not sure about option C. I think option B could also work well by using a NAT gateway for internet access. But I see the benefits of using VPC endpoints in option C.
upvoted 0 times
...
Johnna
2 months ago
I agree with Cassi. Option C seems like the most secure and cost-effective solution for our application as it scales.
upvoted 0 times
...
Fanny
2 months ago
I'm leaning towards Option D. The use of a gateway VPC endpoint for SQS and interface VPC endpoints for S3 and DynamoDB seems like a more secure and efficient setup.
upvoted 0 times
Alaine
19 days ago
User 2
upvoted 0 times
...
Elly
21 days ago
User 1
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Cassi
2 months ago
I think option C is the best choice. It allows us to keep the EC2 instances in a private subnet while still being able to access the necessary services through VPC endpoints.
upvoted 0 times
...
Marquetta
2 months ago
Option C seems like the most cost-effective solution. Using VPC endpoints eliminates the need for a NAT gateway or internet gateway, which can be expensive as usage increases.
upvoted 0 times
Frank
22 days ago
Definitely, cost-effectiveness is key when building internal applications.
upvoted 0 times
...
Meghann
1 months ago
It's important to consider scalability when choosing a networking design.
upvoted 0 times
...
Donette
1 months ago
Yeah, using VPC endpoints can save on costs in the long run.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rhea
1 months ago
I agree, option C seems like the most cost-effective solution.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Yaeko
2 months ago
But with option D, we only need one gateway VPC endpoint for SQS, S3, and DynamoDB.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ammie
2 months ago
I disagree, I believe option D is more cost-effective.
upvoted 0 times
...
Yaeko
2 months ago
I think option A is the best choice.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel