New Year Sale 2026! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Amazon ANS-C01 Exam - Topic 5 Question 36 Discussion

Actual exam question for Amazon's ANS-C01 exam
Question #: 36
Topic #: 5
[All ANS-C01 Questions]

A company has deployed a new web application on Amazon EC2 instances behind an Application Load Balancer (ALB). The instances are in an Amazon EC2 Auto Scaling group. Enterprise customers from around the world will use the application. Employees of these enterprise customers will connect to the application over HTTPS from office locations.

The company must configure firewalls to allow outbound traffic to only approved IP addresses. The employees of the enterprise customers must be able to access the application with the least amount of latency.

Which change should a network engineer make in the infrastructure to meet these requirements?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Derrick
3 months ago
Wait, can CloudFront really handle that much traffic?
upvoted 0 times
...
Mira
3 months ago
I agree, B is the way to go!
upvoted 0 times
...
Laticia
3 months ago
A new Route 53 zone? Not sure that helps with latency.
upvoted 0 times
...
Stephanie
4 months ago
I think C is the best choice for global access.
upvoted 0 times
...
Billi
4 months ago
Option B seems solid for reducing latency.
upvoted 0 times
...
Willard
4 months ago
I feel like Route 53 is more about DNS management, so it might not directly address the latency issue we're facing here.
upvoted 0 times
...
Myra
4 months ago
I practiced a similar question where we had to choose between ALB and NLB, but I can't recall if the NLB would help with latency in this case.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tess
4 months ago
I think Global Accelerator could be a good choice since it optimizes the path to the ALB, but I need to double-check the requirements.
upvoted 0 times
...
Katina
5 months ago
I remember studying about using CloudFront for reducing latency, but I'm not sure if it's the best option here.
upvoted 0 times
...
Berry
5 months ago
I think Option B with CloudFront is an interesting idea, but I'm not sure if it fully addresses the need to control outbound traffic. The Global Accelerator option seems like the most straightforward solution.
upvoted 0 times
...
Phil
5 months ago
I'm not sure if creating a new Network Load Balancer (Option A) is the best approach here. That might just add an extra layer of complexity without really solving the core problem.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dana
5 months ago
Okay, I've got this. Option C is the way to go. AWS Global Accelerator will provide a stable endpoint for the enterprise customers to connect to, while also allowing the company to control the outbound firewall rules.
upvoted 0 times
...
Sang
5 months ago
Hmm, I'm a bit confused on the difference between the options. I'll need to review the details of each one more carefully to decide which one best meets the requirements.
upvoted 0 times
...
Eloisa
5 months ago
I think the key here is to find a way to route traffic to the ALB while also allowing the company to control outbound traffic. Option C with AWS Global Accelerator seems like the best choice to me.
upvoted 0 times
...
Felicidad
5 months ago
I've got this one! The procurement management plan is a subsidiary of the project management plan. It's all about how the project will acquire the necessary goods and services to execute the project successfully.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jina
1 year ago
Haha, the employees better not try to sneak in a few Netflix sessions during their work hours! Option C seems like the most balanced solution for this use case.
upvoted 0 times
Cletus
1 year ago
Yeah, it's important to prioritize performance for the enterprise customers accessing the application.
upvoted 0 times
...
Alonso
1 year ago
I agree, using AWS Global Accelerator would ensure low latency for the employees.
upvoted 0 times
...
Niesha
1 year ago
Option C seems like the most balanced solution for this use case.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Ozell
1 year ago
But wouldn't using AWS Global Accelerator reduce latency for the enterprise customers?
upvoted 0 times
...
Franklyn
1 year ago
I disagree, I believe the answer is D) Create a new Amazon Route 53 hosted zone.
upvoted 0 times
...
Janna
1 year ago
Option B with CloudFront sounds interesting, but I'm not sure if it will provide the same level of control over the firewall rules as the Global Accelerator solution in option C.
upvoted 0 times
Adolph
1 year ago
It's important to consider the specific needs of the enterprise customers when choosing the best solution.
upvoted 0 times
...
Paul
1 year ago
Global Accelerator in option C can provide better control over firewall rules and optimize the routing of traffic.
upvoted 0 times
...
Mila
1 year ago
Option B with CloudFront can help improve latency by caching content closer to the users.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Ozell
1 year ago
I think the answer is C) Create a new accelerator in AWS Global Accelerator.
upvoted 0 times
...
Marjory
1 year ago
I think option C is the way to go. Global Accelerator will help reduce latency for the enterprise customers while the firewall rules can be configured to allow only approved IP addresses.
upvoted 0 times
Mickie
1 year ago
Let's go ahead and create a new accelerator in AWS Global Accelerator and add the ALB as an accelerator endpoint.
upvoted 0 times
...
Carin
1 year ago
That sounds like the best solution for this scenario.
upvoted 0 times
...
Isaac
1 year ago
I agree, it will also allow us to configure the firewall rules to only allow approved IP addresses.
upvoted 0 times
...
Willard
1 year ago
Option C is a good choice. Global Accelerator can help reduce latency for the enterprise customers.
upvoted 0 times
...
...

Save Cancel