A bank built a new version of its banking application in AWS using containers that content to an on-premises database over VPN connection. This application version requires users to also update their client application. The bank plans to deprecate the earlier client version. However, the company wants to keep supporting earlier clients through their on-premises version of the application to serve a small portion of the customers who haven't yet upgraded.
What design will allow the company to serve both newer and earlier clients in the MOST efficient way?
Suggested Answer: D
Get Premium ANS-C01 Questions
as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF
Real Exam Format
Detailed Explanations
Instant Access
Get Your Practice Test
14 comments · newest first
MA
Madelyn
11 months ago
Classic Load Balancer? That's so outdated, B isn't the way to go.
GO
Goldie
11 months ago
A multivalue routing policy could work, but it might complicate things.
RO
Rolland
11 months ago
Wait, can we really support both versions like this? Sounds tricky.
DE
Delsie
12 months ago
I disagree, D seems more flexible with header-based routing.
AS
Ashton
12 months ago
I think option C is the best choice for efficient routing.
JO
Joanne
1 year ago
I feel like header-based routing might be the most flexible option since it allows for more specific control over which clients get routed where, but I need to double-check the requirements.
KI
Kiley
1 year ago
I practiced a similar question where we had to route traffic based on user agents. I wonder if using a user-agent-based rule would be efficient enough for this case.
DE
Desmond
1 year ago
I think using an Application Load Balancer with path-based routing could work, but I'm a bit confused about how to implement that with the different client versions.
AL
Alisha
1 year ago
I remember studying about load balancers, but I'm not sure if Classic Load Balancer is the best choice here since it seems outdated for this scenario.
LE
Leota
1 year ago
This seems like a pretty straightforward question. I think the answer is B - "Very small disbursements" since the question mentions employees trying to keep the sizes of the disbursements low to avoid detection.
SA
Salley
1 year ago
It seems like all the examples we went through had five-digit numbers; I hope that's the case here too!
WA
Walton
1 year ago
I vaguely remember something about Catalyst 3560-CX being discussed in our practice sessions, but the other option is tricky.
EV
Eva
1 year ago
Hmm, I'm not entirely sure about this one. The question mentions that items deleted from removable media aren't stored in the Recycle Bin, so that's an important detail to keep in mind. I'll need to think this through carefully.
RE
Rex
1 year ago
I think establishing operations are related to how the environment affects reinforcement, but I'm not sure which option specifically explains that.