Amazon ANS-C01 Exam - Topic 2 Question 59 Discussion

Actual exam question for Amazon's ANS-C01 exam

Question #: 59
Topic #: 2

A company is using Amazon Route 53 Resolver DNS Firewall in a VPC to block all domains except domains that are on an approved list. The company is concerned that if DNS Firewall is unresponsive, resources in the VPC might be affected if the network cannot resolve any DNS queries. To maintain application service level agreements, the company needs DNS queries to continue to resolve even if Route 53 Resolver does not receive a response from DNS Firewall.

Which change should a network engineer implement to meet these requirements?

AUpdate the DNS Firewall VPC configuration to disable fail open for the VPC.

BUpdate the DNS Firewall VPC configuration to enable fail open for the VPC.

CCreate a new DHCP options set with parameter dns_firewall_fail_open=false. Associate the new DHCP options set with the VPC.

DCreate a new DHCP options set with parameter dns_firewall_fail_open=true. Associate the new DHCP options set with the VPC.

Show Suggested Answer

Suggested Answer: B

by Leota at Jan 05, 2026, 05:16 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium ANS-C01 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel

Lyda

3 days ago

Haha, "dns_firewall_fail_open" sounds like a setting straight out of a sci-fi movie!

upvoted 0 times

...

Avery

8 days ago

D) Creating a DHCP options set with dns_firewall_fail_open=true is the way to go.

upvoted 0 times

...

Lezlie

13 days ago

B) Seems like the right choice to enable fail open and ensure DNS queries can still be resolved.

upvoted 0 times

...

Elmira

19 days ago

I’m leaning towards option B, but I need to double-check if that really aligns with maintaining service level agreements.

upvoted 0 times

...

Jacquelyne

24 days ago

I think enabling fail open would allow DNS queries to resolve even if the firewall is down, but I’m not 100% confident.

upvoted 0 times

...

Helaine

29 days ago

This question feels familiar; I think we practiced something similar about DNS failover strategies in class.

upvoted 0 times

...

Rusty

1 month ago

I remember studying the fail open concept, but I'm not entirely sure if enabling it is the right move here.

upvoted 0 times

...

Lai

1 month ago

Hmm, I'm a little unsure about this one. The question mentions the company wants to block all domains except the approved list, but it also says they need the DNS queries to continue resolving if the Firewall doesn't respond. I'm not sure if disabling or enabling fail open is the better approach to balance those needs.

upvoted 0 times

...

Shenika

1 month ago

I'm pretty confident that option B is the right answer here. Enabling fail open for the DNS Firewall VPC configuration will ensure that DNS queries can still resolve even if the Firewall is unresponsive, which meets the requirement to maintain application service level agreements.

upvoted 0 times

...

Millie

2 months ago

Okay, let me think this through. If we enable fail open, that means the DNS queries will still resolve even if the Firewall doesn't respond. But that goes against the requirement to block all unapproved domains. I think the better option is to disable fail open, so the Firewall has to respond before the queries can resolve.

upvoted 0 times

...

Pura

2 months ago

Hmm, I'm a bit confused. The question says the company is concerned about the impact if the DNS Firewall is unresponsive, but it also says they want to block all domains except the approved list. I'm not sure which option would best balance those requirements.

upvoted 0 times

...

Derick

2 months ago

I think the key here is to maintain application service level agreements, so the DNS queries need to continue resolving even if the Route 53 Resolver doesn't get a response from the DNS Firewall. That sounds like we want the fail open option.

upvoted 0 times

...