New Year Sale 2026! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

Amazon ANS-C01 Exam - Topic 1 Question 9 Discussion

Actual exam question for Amazon's ANS-C01 exam
Question #: 9
Topic #: 1
[All ANS-C01 Questions]

A company has deployed its AWS environment in a single AWS Region. The environment consists of a few hundred application VPCs, a shared services VPC, and a VPN connection to the company's on-premises environment. A network engineer needs to implement a transit gateway with the following requirements:

* Application VPCs must be isolated from each other.

* Bidirectional communication must be allowed between the application VPCs and the on-premises network.

* Bidirectional communication must be allowed between the application VPCs and the shared services VPC.

The network engineer creates the transit gateway with options disabled for default route table association and default route table propagation. The network engineer also creates the VPN attachment for the on-premises network and creates the VPC attachments for the application VPCs and the shared services VPC.

The network engineer must meet all the requirements for the transit gateway by designing a solution that needs the least number of transit gateway route tables.

Which combination of actions should the network engineer perform to accomplish this goal? (Choose two.)

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: B, D

by Kati at May 25, 2023, 09:19 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium ANS-C01 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Submit Cancel
Rosamond
4 months ago
I agree with C, it keeps things simple and efficient!
upvoted 0 times
...
Tawna
4 months ago
Wait, are we really isolating all VPCs with just one route table? Sounds risky.
upvoted 0 times
...
Melita
4 months ago
Definitely not B, that would create too many route tables!
upvoted 0 times
...
Aja
4 months ago
I think option A could work too, but not sure about the propagation part.
upvoted 0 times
...
Glendora
4 months ago
Option C seems like the best choice for minimizing route tables.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lyla
5 months ago
I think we might need a separate route table for on-premises to keep things organized, but I'm not sure if that means we should also separate the shared services VPC.
upvoted 0 times
...
Alishia
5 months ago
If I recall correctly, we want to minimize the number of route tables, so maybe option C makes sense since it allows for shared services and on-premises communication.
upvoted 0 times
...
Leandro
5 months ago
I'm a bit unsure about whether we should have separate route tables for each VPC or just one for all of them. I feel like I saw a similar question about route table propagation.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ardella
5 months ago
I remember that isolating the application VPCs is crucial, so I think we need to avoid propagating all attachments to a single route table.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rikki
5 months ago
Okay, I think I've got this. The key is to focus on the technical recovery aspects like restoring systems, as well as the organizational pieces like evaluating the response plan and making notifications. Providing details to the media is probably not the top concern right now.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ming
5 months ago
This looks like a straightforward declarative question. I think the Roll-Up Summary field approach (option B) is the way to go here.
upvoted 0 times
...
Katina
5 months ago
I vaguely recall something about taxes and how they impact profits versus shareholder returns, maybe that relates to option C?
upvoted 0 times
...
Michell
5 months ago
Wait, I'm a bit confused. Does the social media panel count as a separate component, or is that part of the sidebar? I'm not sure if I should go with 3 or 4 components. I'll have to think about this a bit more.
upvoted 0 times
...
Harrison
5 months ago
I vaguely remember that the Civil Rights Act isn't really focused on safety in facilities; I might be mixing it up with something else.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dacia
5 months ago
Hmm, I'm not sure if a packet filtering firewall is the best option. Wouldn't an application-level proxy firewall be better for controlling the specific FTP-PUT functionality?
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel