Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Amazon Exam ANS-C01 Topic 1 Question 7 Discussion

Actual exam question for Amazon's ANS-C01 exam
Question #: 7
Topic #: 1
[All ANS-C01 Questions]

A company is planning to create a service that requires encryption in transit. The traffic must not be decrypted between the client and the backend of the service. The company will implement the service by using the gRPC protocol over TCP port 443. The service will scale up to thousands of simultaneous connections. The backend of the service will be hosted on an Amazon Elastic Kubernetes Service (Amazon EKS) duster with the Kubernetes Cluster Autoscaler and the Horizontal Pod Autoscaler configured. The company needs to use mutual TLS for two-way authentication between the client and the backend.

Which solution will meet these requirements?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: B

Contribute your Thoughts:

Valentin
18 days ago
Wait, is this a trick question? What if the answer is actually a combination of options, like a Network Load Balancer with an HTTPS listener and an Application Load Balancer for the backend? Hmm, better think this through again.
upvoted 0 times
Casey
2 days ago
User 1: I think the answer might be a combination of options.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Florinda
21 days ago
I'm a big fan of the Network Load Balancer, so I'm leaning towards option D as well. Gotta love those TLS listeners!
upvoted 0 times
...
Johanna
1 months ago
Haha, I bet the person who wrote this question loves to see us struggle with the differences between ALB and NLB. But I'm going with option D - a Network Load Balancer with a TLS listener seems like the right fit.
upvoted 0 times
Farrah
2 days ago
Definitely, using mutual TLS for two-way authentication is crucial for security in this scenario.
upvoted 0 times
...
Novella
10 days ago
Yeah, I think so too. It's important to make sure the traffic remains encrypted between the client and backend.
upvoted 0 times
...
Carli
17 days ago
I agree, option D with a Network Load Balancer and TLS listener seems like the best choice.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Wilbert
2 months ago
This is a tricky one. I'm not sure about the performance implications of using an Application Load Balancer versus a Network Load Balancer. Let me think this through a bit more.
upvoted 0 times
Johnetta
3 days ago
C: But option C with an Application Load Balancer might provide more features for HTTPS traffic.
upvoted 0 times
...
Cletus
4 days ago
B: I agree, Network Load Balancer could handle the traffic better.
upvoted 0 times
...
Nichelle
22 days ago
B: I agree, that seems like the best choice for our requirements.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rosendo
22 days ago
A: I think option A with a Network Load Balancer might be better for performance.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dylan
1 months ago
A: I think we should go with option A and use a Network Load Balancer.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Jamal
2 months ago
But option C also seems viable, it utilizes an Application Load Balancer with an HTTPS listener and adds the EKS managed node group's Auto Scaling group as a target.
upvoted 0 times
...
Iraida
2 months ago
Hmm, this seems straightforward. I think option B is the way to go - using an Application Load Balancer with an HTTPS listener to handle the mutual TLS requirement.
upvoted 0 times
...
Elza
2 months ago
I disagree, I believe option B is better as it uses an Application Load Balancer with an HTTPS listener for secure communication.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jamal
2 months ago
I think option A is the best solution because it uses a Network Load Balancer with a TCP listener on port 443.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel