MENU
A company has an AWS account with four VPCs in the us-east-1 Region. The VPCs consist of a development VPC and three production VPCs that host various workloads.
The company has extended its on-premises data center to AWS with AWS Direct Connect by using a Direct Connect gateway. The company now wants to establish connectivity to its production VPCs and development VPC from on premises. The production VPCs are allowed to route data to each other. However, the development VPC must be isolated from the production VPCs. No data can flow between the development VPC and the production VPCs.
In preparation to implement this solution, a network engineer creates a transit gateway with a single transit gateway route table. Default route table association and default route table propagation are turned off. The network engineer attaches the production VPCs. the development VPC. and the Direct Connect gateway to the transit gateway. For each VPC route table, the network engineer adds a route to 0.0.0.0/0 with the transit gateway as the next destination.
Which combination of steps should the network engineer take next to complete this solution? (Select THREE.)
Suggested Answer: A, C, D
Get Premium ANS-C01 Questions
as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF
Real Exam Format
Detailed Explanations
Instant Access
Get Your Practice Test
31 comments · newest first
EV
Evangelina
11 months ago
B is definitely the way to go for the production VPCs!
BE
Bette
11 months ago
Wait, why would we create a new transit gateway? Seems unnecessary.
SH
Shaquana
11 months ago
I think option E makes the most sense for the development VPC.
PE
Penney
11 months ago
Totally agree, isolation is key here!
LE
Lenna
12 months ago
The development VPC needs to be isolated from production.
RE
Remedios
12 months ago
I’m a bit confused about the security groups; I think option D might be necessary to restrict access, but I’m not certain if it’s one of the required steps.
LA
Lacresha
1 year ago
I practiced a similar question where we had to manage route propagation, and I feel like option A could be the right choice for the production VPCs.
JA
Janna
1 year ago
I’m not entirely sure, but I think option E sounds right because it talks about creating a new route table specifically for the development VPC.
OL
Olive
1 year ago
I remember that we need to ensure the development VPC is isolated, so I think we shouldn't propagate routes from it to the production VPCs.
TE
Terrilyn
1 year ago
I'm not sure about the security group part. Do I really need to change the inbound rules on the transit gateway network interfaces? That seems like an extra step that might not be necessary.
JO
Johnson
1 year ago
This seems straightforward enough. I'll just associate all the attachments with the existing transit gateway route table and propagate the routes. That should give me the connectivity I need.
VE
Velda
1 year ago
Okay, I think I've got this. The key is to create a new transit gateway route table for the development VPC, and then propagate the Direct Connect gateway and development VPC attachments to that route table. That should do the trick.
AI
Aileen
1 year ago
Hmm, I'm a bit confused by all the different VPCs and route tables. I'll need to really focus on understanding the network topology and the specific requirements before I can start solving this.
LI
Lisbeth
1 year ago
This looks like a tricky question, but I think I have a good strategy. I'll need to carefully read through the requirements and think about how to isolate the development VPC while still allowing connectivity to the production VPCs.
WI
William
2 years ago
I also believe we should associate all the attachments with the existing transit gateway route table and propagate the routes.
ME
Mel
2 years ago
Yes, that sounds like a good idea. We need to ensure the production VPCs can communicate with each other.
SU
Suzi
2 years ago
I think we should associate the production VPC attachments with the existing transit gateway route table and propagate the routes.
JO
Johanna
2 years ago
I'm just here for the free snacks, but if you're asking, I'd say A, C, and E sound like the way to go.
ME
Mel
2 years ago
E) Create a new transit gateway route table. Associate the new route table with the development VPC attachment. Propagate the Direct Connect gateway and development VPC attachment to the new route table.
RO
Rosendo
2 years ago
C) Associate the Direct Connect gateway attachment with the existing transit gateway route table. Propagate the Direct Connect gateway attachment to this route table.
PH
Phung
2 years ago
A) Associate the production VPC attachments with the existing transit gateway route table. Propagate the routes from these attachments.
CA
Caitlin
2 years ago
Haha, a magic wand would be nice, but I think the network engineer has to do some actual work here. My money's on A, C, and E.
RA
Rashida
2 years ago
Wait, can't we just use a magic wand to make everything work? Seriously though, I'm voting for A, C, and E.
PA
Pansy
2 years ago
Definitely, following those steps should help achieve the desired network setup.
IZ
Izetta
2 years ago
It's important to make sure no data flows between them to maintain security.
MA
Major
2 years ago
I agree, those steps seem like they would isolate the development VPC from the production VPCs.
SO
Sonia
2 years ago
I think A, C, and E are the best options to complete the solution.
MA
Matt
2 years ago
Gotta love those transit gateways! I reckon options B, D, and F are the way to do it.
AL
Alex
2 years ago
Hmm, this seems pretty straightforward. I think options A, C, and E are the way to go.
FR
France
2 years ago
Yes, those options will help ensure the production VPCs can communicate with each other while keeping the development VPC isolated.
KA
Kayleigh
2 years ago
I agree, options A, C, and E make the most sense for this scenario.