New Year Sale 2026! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

Amazon ANS-C01 Exam - Topic 1 Question 19 Discussion

Actual exam question for Amazon's ANS-C01 exam
Question #: 19
Topic #: 1
[All ANS-C01 Questions]

A company has two business units (BUs). The company operates in the us-east-1 Region and the us-west-1 Region. The company plans to extend to more Regions in the future. Each BU has

a VPC in each Region. Each Region has a transit gateway with the BU VPCs attached. The transit gateways in both Regions are peered.

The company will create several more BUs in the future and will need to isolate some of the BUs from the other BUs. The company wants to migrate to an architecture to incorporate more

Regions and BUs.

Which solution will meet these requirements with the MOST operational efficiency?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: B

Creating a new Route 53 Resolver outbound endpoint in the shared services VPC would enable forwarding of DNS queries from the VPC to on-premises1.Creating forwarding rules for the on-premises hosted domains would enable specifying which domain names are forwarded to the on-premises DNS servers2.Associating the rules with the new Resolver endpoint and each application VPC would enable applying the rules to the VPCs2.This solution would not affect the default DNS resolution behavior of Route 53 Resolver for local VPC domain names and domains that are hosted in Route 53 private hosted zones3.


by Nieves at Jan 26, 2024, 05:11 PM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium ANS-C01 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Submit Cancel
Catina
3 months ago
B and C both leverage Cloud WAN, which is a smart move for future growth.
upvoted 0 times
...
Desmond
3 months ago
D is just a quick fix, not a long-term solution.
upvoted 0 times
...
Loren
4 months ago
Wait, can option C really isolate traffic effectively? Sounds too good to be true.
upvoted 0 times
...
Gail
4 months ago
I disagree, I think option A is simpler to implement.
upvoted 0 times
...
Huey
4 months ago
Option B seems like the best choice for scalability.
upvoted 0 times
...
Roxane
4 months ago
I feel like option D is too simplistic for what they want to achieve with multiple BUs. Updating route tables might not provide the operational efficiency they're looking for.
upvoted 0 times
...
Marnie
4 months ago
I'm a bit confused about the difference between options B and C. They both mention segments, but I can't recall which one is better for isolating traffic.
upvoted 0 times
...
Oretha
4 months ago
I think option B sounds familiar; it might be similar to a practice question we did on AWS Cloud WAN. It seems like a more scalable solution for future BUs.
upvoted 0 times
...
Benedict
5 months ago
I remember studying about transit gateways and how they can simplify network management, but I'm not sure if creating new ones for each BU is the best approach.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rodrigo
5 months ago
I'm a bit confused by the options presented. Attaching new VPCs to the existing transit gateways and updating route tables doesn't seem like it would provide the level of isolation and control the company is looking for. I'll need to carefully review the details of the AWS Cloud WAN solution.
upvoted 0 times
...
Billye
5 months ago
Okay, I think I've got a good handle on this. The AWS Cloud WAN solution with segmentation seems like the most scalable and operationally efficient approach to meet the company's requirements. I'll focus on understanding how to configure the segments and segment actions.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lawrence
5 months ago
Hmm, this is a tricky one. I'm not sure if creating a new transit gateway for each BU is the most efficient approach, especially as the company plans to add more Regions and BUs in the future. I'll need to think through the pros and cons of each option.
upvoted 0 times
...
Bernardine
5 months ago
This question seems straightforward, but I want to make sure I understand the requirements correctly. I'll need to carefully review the details about the existing architecture and the company's future plans.
upvoted 0 times
...
Laurel
5 months ago
Hmm, I'm a little unsure about this one. The wording is a bit tricky, and I want to make sure I understand the difference between the options before selecting an answer.
upvoted 0 times
...
Chery
5 months ago
Whoa, this is a tough one. Delirium could be caused by a lot of different toxins. I'm not sure if I can narrow it down to just one answer here.
upvoted 0 times
...
Alfreda
5 months ago
This looks like a straightforward question on statistical terminology. I'll read through the options carefully and try to recall the definitions we covered in class.
upvoted 0 times
...
Amos
5 months ago
I've got a good feeling about this one. Based on my understanding of the FAS architecture, I think the FAS server and the Citrix ADC are the two components that directly communicate during the resource launch process. I'll mark those two options.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jerilyn
9 months ago
I'm just glad the question didn't involve any AWS Outposts or Wavelength Zones. That would have been a real head-scratcher.
upvoted 0 times
...
Alonso
10 months ago
Option D seems like the lazy way out. Just attaching new VPCs to the existing transit gateways? Where's the innovation, people? Let's go with the AWS Cloud WAN option and really impress the boss.
upvoted 0 times
Elouise
9 months ago
Let's go with the Cloud WAN option and show some real progress in our architecture.
upvoted 0 times
...
Peggie
9 months ago
I agree, the Cloud WAN option seems more innovative and efficient.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tyra
9 months ago
Option D is the easy way, but we need to impress the boss with the AWS Cloud WAN option.
upvoted 0 times
...
Malcolm
9 months ago
That sounds like a better plan. Let's impress the boss with a more advanced architecture.
upvoted 0 times
...
Nan
9 months ago
I agree, let's go with the AWS Cloud WAN option for a more innovative solution.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lisha
9 months ago
Option D is the easy way, but not the most efficient.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Dominque
10 months ago
I bet the AWS Cloud WAN core network in options B and C will be a hit with the hipsters in the company. They'll probably want to add some blockchain integration and a microservices architecture while they're at it.
upvoted 0 times
Cristal
9 months ago
I think the hipsters in the company will definitely be excited about the potential blockchain integration and microservices architecture.
upvoted 0 times
...
Annmarie
9 months ago
Yeah, I agree. The AWS Cloud WAN core network seems like a scalable option for future growth.
upvoted 0 times
...
Eloisa
9 months ago
Option B sounds like a cool and modern solution for the company's expansion.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Hubert
10 months ago
I'm not a fan of the transit gateway approach in option A. Creating a new transit gateway for each BU in each Region sounds like a lot of overhead and maintenance. Option C looks like a cleaner and more scalable solution.
upvoted 0 times
Quinn
9 months ago
Yeah, it definitely seems like a more efficient solution for future growth.
upvoted 0 times
...
Anabel
9 months ago
Creating a Cloud WAN core network in both Regions sounds like a good way to isolate BUs.
upvoted 0 times
...
Chauncey
9 months ago
I agree, Option C with the AWS Cloud WAN core network seems like a more streamlined approach.
upvoted 0 times
...
Emmanuel
9 months ago
I agree, Option C seems like a more streamlined approach for future scalability.
upvoted 0 times
...
Leah
9 months ago
Option A seems like it could get messy with all those transit gateways to manage.
upvoted 0 times
...
Audra
9 months ago
I agree, Option C seems more streamlined and easier to manage.
upvoted 0 times
...
Twana
9 months ago
Option A seems like it could get messy with all those transit gateways.
upvoted 0 times
...
Trina
10 months ago
Option A seems like it could get messy with all those transit gateways.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Lakeesha
10 months ago
I'm leaning towards option B. Creating a Cloud WAN core network with segments seems like a scalable solution for future expansion.
upvoted 0 times
...
Isadora
10 months ago
I disagree, I believe option D is better. It's simpler to just attach new VPCs to existing transit gateways.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lorean
10 months ago
I think option A is the best choice. It seems like the most efficient way to control traffic between BUs.
upvoted 0 times
...
Raelene
11 months ago
That's a valid point, Annamae. But I still think creating new transit gateways for each BU will offer better control over traffic between BUs.
upvoted 0 times
...
Annamae
11 months ago
I disagree, I believe option D is more efficient. Attaching new VPCs to existing transit gateways will simplify the architecture and reduce complexity.
upvoted 0 times
...
Sylvia
11 months ago
The question is pretty straightforward. I think option C is the best solution as it allows for the creation of an AWS Cloud WAN core network with segment isolation to control traffic between the BUs. This seems to be the most operationally efficient approach.
upvoted 0 times
Werner
9 months ago
But option C seems to offer a more comprehensive solution with segment isolation for better control over traffic.
upvoted 0 times
...
Carline
9 months ago
I think option A could also work by creating new transit gateways for each BU and updating route tables.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jesusita
10 months ago
Creating a Cloud WAN core network with segment isolation does sound like a good way to manage the traffic between the BUs.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jodi
10 months ago
I agree, option C seems like the most efficient solution for isolating traffic between the BUs.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Raelene
11 months ago
I think option A is the best choice. Creating new transit gateways for each new BU will provide the needed isolation and operational efficiency.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel