MENU
A company has two business units (BUs). The company operates in the us-east-1 Region and the us-west-1 Region. The company plans to extend to more Regions in the future. Each BU has
a VPC in each Region. Each Region has a transit gateway with the BU VPCs attached. The transit gateways in both Regions are peered.
The company will create several more BUs in the future and will need to isolate some of the BUs from the other BUs. The company wants to migrate to an architecture to incorporate more
Regions and BUs.
Which solution will meet these requirements with the MOST operational efficiency?
49 comments · newest first
CA
Catina
11 months ago
B and C both leverage Cloud WAN, which is a smart move for future growth.
DE
Desmond
11 months ago
D is just a quick fix, not a long-term solution.
LO
Loren
11 months ago
Wait, can option C really isolate traffic effectively? Sounds too good to be true.
GA
Gail
12 months ago
I disagree, I think option A is simpler to implement.
HU
Huey
12 months ago
Option B seems like the best choice for scalability.
RO
Roxane
12 months ago
I feel like option D is too simplistic for what they want to achieve with multiple BUs. Updating route tables might not provide the operational efficiency they're looking for.
MA
Marnie
1 year ago
I'm a bit confused about the difference between options B and C. They both mention segments, but I can't recall which one is better for isolating traffic.
OR
Oretha
1 year ago
I think option B sounds familiar; it might be similar to a practice question we did on AWS Cloud WAN. It seems like a more scalable solution for future BUs.
BE
Benedict
1 year ago
I remember studying about transit gateways and how they can simplify network management, but I'm not sure if creating new ones for each BU is the best approach.
RO
Rodrigo
1 year ago
I'm a bit confused by the options presented. Attaching new VPCs to the existing transit gateways and updating route tables doesn't seem like it would provide the level of isolation and control the company is looking for. I'll need to carefully review the details of the AWS Cloud WAN solution.
BI
Billye
1 year ago
Okay, I think I've got a good handle on this. The AWS Cloud WAN solution with segmentation seems like the most scalable and operationally efficient approach to meet the company's requirements. I'll focus on understanding how to configure the segments and segment actions.
LA
Lawrence
1 year ago
Hmm, this is a tricky one. I'm not sure if creating a new transit gateway for each BU is the most efficient approach, especially as the company plans to add more Regions and BUs in the future. I'll need to think through the pros and cons of each option.
BE
Bernardine
1 year ago
This question seems straightforward, but I want to make sure I understand the requirements correctly. I'll need to carefully review the details about the existing architecture and the company's future plans.
LA
Laurel
1 year ago
Hmm, I'm a little unsure about this one. The wording is a bit tricky, and I want to make sure I understand the difference between the options before selecting an answer.
CH
Chery
1 year ago
Whoa, this is a tough one. Delirium could be caused by a lot of different toxins. I'm not sure if I can narrow it down to just one answer here.
AL
Alfreda
1 year ago
This looks like a straightforward question on statistical terminology. I'll read through the options carefully and try to recall the definitions we covered in class.
AM
Amos
1 year ago
I've got a good feeling about this one. Based on my understanding of the FAS architecture, I think the FAS server and the Citrix ADC are the two components that directly communicate during the resource launch process. I'll mark those two options.
JE
Jerilyn
1 year ago
I'm just glad the question didn't involve any AWS Outposts or Wavelength Zones. That would have been a real head-scratcher.
AL
Alonso
1 year ago
Option D seems like the lazy way out. Just attaching new VPCs to the existing transit gateways? Where's the innovation, people? Let's go with the AWS Cloud WAN option and really impress the boss.
EL
Elouise
1 year ago
Let's go with the Cloud WAN option and show some real progress in our architecture.
PE
Peggie
1 year ago
I agree, the Cloud WAN option seems more innovative and efficient.
TY
Tyra
1 year ago
Option D is the easy way, but we need to impress the boss with the AWS Cloud WAN option.
MA
Malcolm
1 year ago
That sounds like a better plan. Let's impress the boss with a more advanced architecture.
NA
Nan
1 year ago
I agree, let's go with the AWS Cloud WAN option for a more innovative solution.
LI
Lisha
1 year ago
Option D is the easy way, but not the most efficient.
DO
Dominque
1 year ago
I bet the AWS Cloud WAN core network in options B and C will be a hit with the hipsters in the company. They'll probably want to add some blockchain integration and a microservices architecture while they're at it.
CR
Cristal
1 year ago
I think the hipsters in the company will definitely be excited about the potential blockchain integration and microservices architecture.
AN
Annmarie
1 year ago
Yeah, I agree. The AWS Cloud WAN core network seems like a scalable option for future growth.
EL
Eloisa
1 year ago
Option B sounds like a cool and modern solution for the company's expansion.
HU
Hubert
2 years ago
I'm not a fan of the transit gateway approach in option A. Creating a new transit gateway for each BU in each Region sounds like a lot of overhead and maintenance. Option C looks like a cleaner and more scalable solution.
QU
Quinn
1 year ago
Yeah, it definitely seems like a more efficient solution for future growth.
AN
Anabel
1 year ago
Creating a Cloud WAN core network in both Regions sounds like a good way to isolate BUs.
CH
Chauncey
1 year ago
I agree, Option C with the AWS Cloud WAN core network seems like a more streamlined approach.
EM
Emmanuel
1 year ago
I agree, Option C seems like a more streamlined approach for future scalability.
LE
Leah
1 year ago
Option A seems like it could get messy with all those transit gateways to manage.
AU
Audra
1 year ago
I agree, Option C seems more streamlined and easier to manage.
TW
Twana
1 year ago
Option A seems like it could get messy with all those transit gateways.
TR
Trina
1 year ago
Option A seems like it could get messy with all those transit gateways.
LA
Lakeesha
2 years ago
I'm leaning towards option B. Creating a Cloud WAN core network with segments seems like a scalable solution for future expansion.
IS
Isadora
2 years ago
I disagree, I believe option D is better. It's simpler to just attach new VPCs to existing transit gateways.
LO
Lorean
2 years ago
I think option A is the best choice. It seems like the most efficient way to control traffic between BUs.
RA
Raelene
2 years ago
That's a valid point, Annamae. But I still think creating new transit gateways for each BU will offer better control over traffic between BUs.
AN
Annamae
2 years ago
I disagree, I believe option D is more efficient. Attaching new VPCs to existing transit gateways will simplify the architecture and reduce complexity.
SY
Sylvia
2 years ago
The question is pretty straightforward. I think option C is the best solution as it allows for the creation of an AWS Cloud WAN core network with segment isolation to control traffic between the BUs. This seems to be the most operationally efficient approach.
WE
Werner
1 year ago
But option C seems to offer a more comprehensive solution with segment isolation for better control over traffic.
CA
Carline
1 year ago
I think option A could also work by creating new transit gateways for each BU and updating route tables.
JE
Jesusita
1 year ago
Creating a Cloud WAN core network with segment isolation does sound like a good way to manage the traffic between the BUs.
JO
Jodi
1 year ago
I agree, option C seems like the most efficient solution for isolating traffic between the BUs.
RA
Raelene
2 years ago
I think option A is the best choice. Creating new transit gateways for each new BU will provide the needed isolation and operational efficiency.