New Year Sale 2026! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Alibaba ACP-Cloud1 Exam - Topic 3 Question 65 Discussion

Actual exam question for Alibaba's ACP-Cloud1 exam
Question #: 65
Topic #: 3
[All ACP-Cloud1 Questions]

The backend server pool of an Alibaba Cloud SLB contains multiple ECS instances, which may have different service capacities. To exploit the different service capacities of backend ECS instances, which of the following statements is correct?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: A

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Emerson
3 months ago
Weighted Round Robin is the best option for utilizing capacity effectively.
upvoted 0 times
...
Reynalda
3 months ago
Surprised that people think D guarantees more requests! It’s not that simple.
upvoted 0 times
...
Elmer
3 months ago
C is wrong, Round-Robin doesn't consider capacity at all.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ammie
4 months ago
I disagree, B is misleading. SLB can assign requests based on weights.
upvoted 0 times
...
Alishia
4 months ago
A is definitely the way to go for better load balancing.
upvoted 0 times
...
Aracelis
4 months ago
Weighted Least-Connection sounds familiar, but I'm not confident it guarantees more requests for higher capacity instances.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jeanice
4 months ago
I practiced a similar question, and I think Round Robin just distributes requests evenly, regardless of capacity.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ashlyn
4 months ago
I'm not entirely sure, but I feel like SLB can assign more requests based on weights, right?
upvoted 0 times
...
Brendan
5 months ago
I remember studying about load balancing algorithms, and I think Weighted Round Robin is the way to go for different capacities.
upvoted 0 times
...
James
5 months ago
I feel pretty confident that Option A is the correct answer here. Weighted Round Robin is designed to send more traffic to the higher capacity instances, so that's the best way to exploit the different service capacities in this scenario.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lonny
5 months ago
Hmm, I'm a bit confused. I'm not sure if SLB can actually assign more requests to certain instances based on their capacities. Option B seems to suggest that's not possible, so I'm not sure which answer is correct.
upvoted 0 times
...
Adrianna
5 months ago
I think the key here is to exploit the different service capacities of the backend ECS instances. Option A sounds like the right approach, using Weighted Round Robin to assign more requests to the higher capacity instances.
upvoted 0 times
...
Mammie
5 months ago
Okay, let me think this through. I know Round-Robin mode distributes requests evenly, so that doesn't sound like the right approach if we want to take advantage of the different capacities. Option D with Weighted Least-Connection seems more promising, but I'm not 100% sure.
upvoted 0 times
...
Alecia
5 months ago
Okay, I remember learning about this in class. The two options are BYOL, where you bring your own Oracle license, and License Included, where Amazon provides the license. I'm confident that B is the correct answer.
upvoted 0 times
...
Levi
10 months ago
I bet the backend ECS instances have different RAM sizes. That's gonna be a real 'weight' on your mind when choosing the right load balancing mode!
upvoted 0 times
Buck
9 months ago
A) Choose Weighted Round Robin mode to set higher weights to ECS instances with higher capacities The higher the weight of the backend ECS instance the higher chance that the instance will receive requests.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rozella
9 months ago
C) Choose Round-Robin model and ECS instances with higher capacities will surely be assigned with more requests.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kathrine
10 months ago
A) Choose Weighted Round Robin mode to set higher weights to ECS instances with higher capacities The higher the weight of the backend ECS instance the higher chance that the instance will receive requests.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Broderick
10 months ago
D seems like the most logical choice. Weighted Least-Connection should be able to distribute the load based on instance capacities.
upvoted 0 times
...
Janna
10 months ago
C is tempting, but I'm not convinced that Round-Robin alone can exploit different capacities. Weighted methods might be better.
upvoted 0 times
Berry
9 months ago
C) Choose Round-Robin model and ECS instances with higher capacities will surely be assigned with more requests.
upvoted 0 times
...
Oretha
10 months ago
A) Choose Weighted Round Robin mode to set higher weights to ECS instances with higher capacities The higher the weight of the backend ECS instance the higher chance that the instance will receive requests.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Amber
11 months ago
But in Weighted Round Robin mode, higher weights are assigned to ECS instances with higher capacities, so they receive more requests.
upvoted 0 times
...
Georgene
11 months ago
B seems to contradict the premise of the question. SLB is designed to handle different instance capacities, so it must be able to assign more requests to certain instances.
upvoted 0 times
Nida
10 months ago
A) Choose Weighted Round Robin mode to set higher weights to ECS instances with higher capacities The higher the weight of the backend ECS instance the higher chance that the instance will receive requests.
upvoted 0 times
...
Charlesetta
10 months ago
B) SLB cannot assign more requests to certain ECS instances.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rueben
10 months ago
C) Choose Round-Robin model and ECS instances with higher capacities will surely be assigned with more requests.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rex
10 months ago
A) Choose Weighted Round Robin mode to set higher weights to ECS instances with higher capacities The higher the weight of the backend ECS instance the higher chance that the instance will receive requests.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Ty
11 months ago
I disagree, I believe the answer is D.
upvoted 0 times
...
Eve
11 months ago
A sounds reasonable, but I'm not sure if the higher weight guarantees more requests. I'd like to know more about how the weight is calculated.
upvoted 0 times
...
Amber
11 months ago
I think the correct statement is A.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel