New Year Sale 2026! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Alibaba ACA-Operator Exam - Topic 2 Question 65 Discussion

Actual exam question for Alibaba's ACA-Operator exam
Question #: 65
Topic #: 2
[All ACA-Operator Questions]

A Developer is creating a Function Compute function. This function requires around 1 GB of temporary storage for files while executing. These files will not be needed after the function is completed for a fixed period. How can this developer MOST efficiently handle the temporary files?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: D

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Shawna
3 months ago
/tmp directory is perfect for this scenario!
upvoted 0 times
...
Roselle
3 months ago
OSS with lifecycle (D) is overkill for temporary files.
upvoted 0 times
...
Corinne
3 months ago
Surprised that NFS (B) is even an option here!
upvoted 0 times
...
Weldon
4 months ago
I disagree, Cloud Disk (A) seems more reliable.
upvoted 0 times
...
Krissy
4 months ago
Option C is the best choice for temp files!
upvoted 0 times
...
Zita
4 months ago
I’m leaning towards the OSS bucket option, but I’m not completely confident about the lifecycle policy and how it works in this context.
upvoted 0 times
...
Carmen
4 months ago
I practiced a similar question where we had to manage temporary files, and I feel like storing them in /tmp is usually the go-to method.
upvoted 0 times
...
Germaine
4 months ago
I think using Cloud Disk could work, but it might not be the most efficient option since it involves extra steps for deletion.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tasia
5 months ago
I remember that temporary storage is often best handled in the /tmp directory, but I'm not sure if ECS is the right choice here.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lauran
5 months ago
I think the OSS bucket with a lifecycle policy is the way to go here. It should provide the necessary storage and automatically delete the files when they're no longer needed. That seems like the most efficient solution.
upvoted 0 times
...
Launa
5 months ago
Okay, let's see. Storing the files in Cloud Disk or NFS could work, but I'm not sure if that's the most efficient option. The /tmp directory on a temporary ECS instance might be a good choice, but I'll need to double-check the details.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ashley
5 months ago
Hmm, 1 GB of temporary storage is a decent amount. I'll need to think through the pros and cons of each option to determine the most efficient approach.
upvoted 0 times
...
Pearlie
5 months ago
This seems like a straightforward question about handling temporary files efficiently. I'll need to carefully consider the options and choose the one that best meets the requirements.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lonny
5 months ago
Okay, let me break this down step-by-step. I think the key is understanding how the spread operator behaves with nested objects.
upvoted 0 times
...
Elden
5 months ago
I'm a bit confused by the wording of the question. Is it asking about who is responsible for the overall capacity planning, or just the monitoring and controlling part? I'll need to re-read it carefully.
upvoted 0 times
...
Billy
2 years ago
I agree, Option D is the way to go. Why bother with extra steps like copying to NFS or temporary ECS instances when you can just let OSS handle it for you?
upvoted 0 times
...
Jaclyn
2 years ago
Option D is clearly the most efficient choice. Storing the files in an OSS bucket with a lifecycle policy to automatically delete them is the simplest and most streamlined approach.
upvoted 0 times
Lucy
1 year ago
Definitely, it helps keep things organized and automated.
upvoted 0 times
...
Elenore
1 year ago
That makes sense, it's a good way to handle temporary files without manual intervention.
upvoted 0 times
...
Leslee
1 year ago
Storing the files in an OSS bucket with a lifecycle policy to automatically delete them is the simplest and most streamlined approach.
upvoted 0 times
...
Mayra
2 years ago
Option D is clearly the most efficient choice.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Gail
2 years ago
Storing the files in an OSS bucket with a lifecycle policy will automatically delete them, saving time and effort.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rocco
2 years ago
Why do you think option D is better?
upvoted 0 times
...
Gail
2 years ago
I disagree, I believe option D is more efficient.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rocco
2 years ago
I think option A is the best choice.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel