Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

Alibaba Exam ACA-CloudNative Topic 7 Question 77 Discussion

Actual exam question for Alibaba's ACA-CloudNative exam
Question #: 77
Topic #: 7
[All ACA-CloudNative Questions]

How do you calculate a Kubernetes cluster's consistent resource capacity?

Score 2

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: A, B, C, D

by James at Nov 21, 2023, 09:09 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium ACA-CloudNative Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel
Altha
3 months ago
Option C is the way to go. It's like calculating the perfect recipe for a Kubernetes stew - you need the right ingredients in the right proportions.
upvoted 0 times
Gene
1 months ago
Adding autoscale nodes instance type can help ensure consistent capacity for the cluster.
upvoted 0 times
...
Sena
2 months ago
Definitely, it's important to consider redundancy when calculating resource capacity.
upvoted 0 times
...
Marti
2 months ago
Option C is the way to go. It's like calculating the perfect recipe for a Kubernetes stew - you need the right ingredients in the right proportions.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Art
3 months ago
If I choose Option A, my cluster will be as consistent as my coding skills - not very consistent at all!
upvoted 0 times
Yvonne
2 months ago
I would go with Option C to ensure the cluster has the necessary redundancy for consistent capacity.
upvoted 0 times
...
Yvonne
2 months ago
You're right, Option A might not be the best choice for calculating consistent resource capacity.
upvoted 0 times
...
Yvonne
2 months ago
Option A doesn't take into account the redundancy needed for consistent capacity.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Anika
3 months ago
Option B seems too simplistic. Kubernetes clusters need to account for redundancy and autoscaling to handle workload changes.
upvoted 0 times
Josue
2 months ago
D) Microservice amount * Average instance amount * Instance type (e.g. 2C/4G) * Redundancy + Autoscale nodes instance type
upvoted 0 times
...
Miesha
2 months ago
C) Microservice amount * Average instance amount * Instance type (e.g. 2C/4G) * Redundancy
upvoted 0 times
...
Georgiann
2 months ago
B) Microservice amount * Average instance amount * Instance type (e.g. 2C/4G)
upvoted 0 times
...
Rosalyn
2 months ago
A) Microservice amount * Instance type (e.g. 2C/4G)
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Shenika
3 months ago
I'm going with Option D. Autoscaling is important for maintaining consistent resource capacity in a Kubernetes cluster.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lavonne
3 months ago
But what about autoscaling nodes instance type in option D? That could affect the capacity calculation
upvoted 0 times
...
Gaston
3 months ago
Option C looks like the right answer, it takes into account the microservice amount, average instance amount, instance type, and redundancy.
upvoted 0 times
Louvenia
2 months ago
Definitely, it gives a more accurate representation of the cluster's capacity.
upvoted 0 times
...
Annelle
2 months ago
I agree, it's important to consider all those variables.
upvoted 0 times
...
Leonie
3 months ago
Yeah, it covers all the important factors for calculating resource capacity.
upvoted 0 times
...
Joanna
3 months ago
I think option C is the best choice.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Ashton
4 months ago
I disagree, I believe it's C) Microservice amount * Average instance amount * Instance type * Redundancy
upvoted 0 times
...
Lavonne
4 months ago
I think the answer is B) Microservice amount * Average instance amount * Instance type
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel