New Year Sale 2026! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Alibaba ACA-Cloud1 Exam - Topic 6 Question 49 Discussion

Actual exam question for Alibaba's ACA-Cloud1 exam
Question #: 49
Topic #: 6
[All ACA-Cloud1 Questions]

Auto Scaling is a management service that can automatically adjust elastic computing resources based on your business needs and policies. It supports adding existing ECS instances into the scaling group, whose status however must be .

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Marsha
4 months ago
Just Created instances can’t be added? That’s surprising!
upvoted 0 times
...
Luz
4 months ago
Wait, really? I thought Preparing was a valid state.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lisha
4 months ago
I thought Stopped could work too, but guess not.
upvoted 0 times
...
Elfriede
4 months ago
Totally agree, Running is the only option!
upvoted 0 times
...
Amos
4 months ago
It has to be Running to add to the scaling group.
upvoted 0 times
...
Effie
5 months ago
I definitely recall that only "Running" instances can be added, but I hope I’m not mixing it up with another service.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kimbery
5 months ago
I’m a bit confused about the statuses. I thought "Created" might work too, but it doesn't sound right now.
upvoted 0 times
...
Donette
5 months ago
I remember practicing a similar question where the instance status was crucial, and "Running" seemed to be the right choice.
upvoted 0 times
...
Xuan
5 months ago
I think the instances need to be in a "Running" state to be added to the scaling group, but I'm not completely sure.
upvoted 0 times
...
Gary
5 months ago
This one seems pretty straightforward. I'm pretty sure the V-model is the right answer here.
upvoted 0 times
...
Willow
5 months ago
I'm pretty confident I know the answer to this. The 802.11a node and 802.11g access point should be able to communicate, but there may be some performance impacts.
upvoted 0 times
...
Mary
5 months ago
Hmm, I'm a bit unsure about the specifics here. Retrieving the existing secret and storing its value seems easy enough, but creating a new secret and a pod that can access it might be trickier. I'll need to review my Kubernetes notes carefully.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel