Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

AIWMI CCRA-L2 Exam - Topic 4 Question 64 Discussion

Posted by Yoko on Jan 07, 2023 at 02:02 PM

''Following four entities operate in the Indian IT and BPO space. They all are into same segment of providing off-shore analytical services. They all operate on the labour cost-arbitrage in India and the countries of their clients. Following information pertains for the year ended March 31, 2013.

The year FY13, was typically a good year for Indian IT companies. For FY14, the economic analysts have given following predictions about the IT Industry:

A) It is expected that INR will appreciate sharply against other USD.

B) Given high inflation and attrition in IT Industry in India, the wages of IT sector employees will increase more sharply than Inflation and general wage rise in country.

C) US Congress will be passing a bill which restricts the outsourcing to third world countries like India.While analyzing the four entities, you come across following findings related to Glowing:

Glowing is promoted by Mr.M R Bhutta, who has earlier promoted two other business ventures, He started with ABC Entertainment Ltd in 1996 and was promoter and MD of the company. ABC was a listed entity and its share price had sharp movements at the time of stock market scam in late 1990s. In 1999, Mr.Bhutta sold his entire stake and resigned from the post of MD. The stock price declined by about 90% in coming days and has never recovered. Later on in 2003, Mr.Bhutta again promoted a new business, Klear Publications Ltd (KCL) an in the business of magazine publication. The entity had come out with a successful IPO and raised money from public. Thereafter it ran into troubles and reported losses. In 2009, Mr.Bhutta went on to exit this business as well by selling stake to other promoter(s). There have been reports in both instances with allegations that promoters have siphoned off money from listed entities to other group entities, however, nothing has been proved in any court.''

Based solely on Total Debt to EBITDA and Interest Coverage, which of the four entities is best amongst the four respectively:

Suggested Answer: D

Get Premium CCRA-L2 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF Real Exam Format Detailed Explanations Instant Access Get Your Practice Test
38 comments · newest first
ER
Ernest 12 months ago
Wait, are we really trusting Bhutta again? Sounds fishy.
TA
Tamie 1 year ago
Totally agree, Glamorous looks solid based on the numbers.
TE
Teddy 1 year ago
Not sure about Glowing, seems risky with that track record.
TR
Tresa 1 year ago
I think Glamorous is the safest bet here!
RE
Reid 1 year ago
Glowing has a rough history with its promoters.
LU
Lucy 1 year ago
I feel like the interest coverage ratio could really help differentiate between the entities, but I'm uncertain about how the economic predictions will affect their performance.
LA
Lashandra 1 year ago
Based on what I studied, if Glowing has a high Total Debt to EBITDA, it might not be the best choice, especially with Mr. Bhutta's history.
GL
Glendora 1 year ago
I think we practiced a similar question where we had to analyze debt ratios, but I can't recall the exact implications of high interest coverage in this context.
HE
Helaine 1 year ago
I remember we discussed how Total Debt to EBITDA can indicate financial health, but I'm not sure how to apply it here with Glowing's background.
VA
Valentine 1 year ago
Hmm, this looks like a tricky one. I'll need to carefully review the options and think through the steps required for Cisco FTD redundancy.
EL
Elke 1 year ago
Okay, I think the key here is to focus on the requirements - reducing credential requests and integrating with social networks. Based on that, I'm leaning towards OAuth as the best option.
HE
Helaine 1 year ago
Hmm, this looks like a tricky one. I'll need to think carefully about where the keywords for mobile processing of quotes are defined.
ON
Ona 2 years ago
I wonder if Glowing and Beautiful is the new trend in the IT industry - sparkly resumes and smooth-talking CEOs. But I'd rather have a company that's financially sound, not just aesthetically pleasing.
DA
Dante 1 year ago
↳ replying to Ona
Yeah, Glowing seems like a safer bet compared to Glowing and Beautiful.
SA
Samira 1 year ago
↳ replying to Ona
I think Glowing might be the best option based on their Total Debt to EBITDA and Interest Coverage.
DA
Daniel 1 year ago
↳ replying to Ona
I agree, financial stability is crucial when choosing a company to work with.
LO
Loise 2 years ago
Glamorous and Glamorous, huh? Looks like someone's playing a dangerous game of double-dipping. I'd steer clear of that one if I were you.
DE
Deane 1 year ago
↳ replying to Loise
I think it's wise to consider the financial stability of the entities before making any investment decisions. Glowing seems like a more reliable option in this case.
BE
Bettina 1 year ago
↳ replying to Loise
Definitely, Glowing might be a safer bet based on the financial indicators provided. It's always important to do thorough research before investing.
AR
Arlie 1 year ago
↳ replying to Loise
I agree, it seems risky to invest in Glamorous and Glamorous with their history of sharp stock price movements and allegations of siphoning off money.
JE
Jerlene 2 years ago
Glamorous and Glowing, eh? Guess the promoter's got a flair for flashy names, but the numbers don't lie. Let's hope they're more substance than style.
VI
Vincent 1 year ago
↳ replying to Jerlene
It's always a good idea to consider the track record of the promoter, but ultimately the financial metrics will give a clearer picture of the entity's health.
PA
Pansy 1 year ago
↳ replying to Jerlene
I wonder if the past history of the promoter will have any impact on the current performance of Glowing.
TW
Twana 1 year ago
↳ replying to Jerlene
Definitely, numbers don't lie. It's important to look beyond the names and focus on the financial health of the entities.
AR
Aretha 1 year ago
↳ replying to Jerlene
I agree, flashy names can only take you so far. Substance is key in the long run.
KA
Karan 1 year ago
↳ replying to Jerlene
True, it's important to consider the past performance and track record of the promoters.
KI
Kirby 1 year ago
↳ replying to Jerlene
I think Glowing might have some red flags based on the promoter's history with other ventures.
JU
Justine 1 year ago
↳ replying to Jerlene
Definitely, we need to look beyond the names and focus on the financial health of the companies.
LO
Loreen 1 year ago
↳ replying to Jerlene
I agree, flashy names don't always mean success in business.
GL
Glendora 2 years ago
Yes, especially considering the history of the promoter and the past performance of the other entities.
LA
Lamonica 2 years ago
Glowing and Beautiful, huh? Sounds like a beauty pageant, not a financial analysis. I hope the examiners are more discerning than that.
GE
Geoffrey 1 year ago
↳ replying to Lamonica
That's a good idea, let's analyze the data and make a decision based on the numbers.
DO
Dorsey 2 years ago
↳ replying to Lamonica
Definitely, let's look at the Total Debt to EBITDA and Interest Coverage for each entity.
KR
Kristel 2 years ago
↳ replying to Lamonica
I think we should focus on the financial analysis aspect of the question.
JE
Jennifer 2 years ago
↳ replying to Lamonica
I agree, Glowing and Beautiful does sound like a beauty pageant.
CA
Carolann 2 years ago
Glamorous and Glamorous? Seems like a double whammy! I bet someone's trying to pull a fast one on us.
NA
Nathalie 2 years ago
I agree with you, Glowing seems to have a better financial position compared to the others.
GL
Glendora 2 years ago
I think Glowing might be the best based on Total Debt to EBITDA and Interest Coverage.
0/2000 characters

Save Cancel