Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

AICPA CPA-Regulation Exam - Topic 2 Question 57 Discussion

Baum, an unmarried optometrist and sole proprietor of Optics, buys and maintains a supply of eyeglasses and frames to sell in the ordinary course of business. In 1999, Optics had $350,000 in gross business receipts and its year-end inventory was not subject to the uniform capitalization rules. Baum's 1999 adjusted gross income was $90,000 and Baum qualified to itemize deductions. During 1999, Baum recorded the following information:Business expenses:What amount should Baum report as 1999 net earnings from self-employment?
D) $281,750
A) $243,250
B) $252,000
C) $273,000

AICPA CPA-Regulation Exam - Topic 2 Question 57 Discussion

Actual exam question for AICPA's CPA-Regulation exam
Question #: 57
Topic #: 2
[All CPA-Regulation Questions]

Baum, an unmarried optometrist and sole proprietor of Optics, buys and maintains a supply of eyeglasses and frames to sell in the ordinary course of business. In 1999, Optics had $350,000 in gross business receipts and its year-end inventory was not subject to the uniform capitalization rules. Baum's 1999 adjusted gross income was $90,000 and Baum qualified to itemize deductions. During 1999, Baum recorded the following information:

Business expenses:

What amount should Baum report as 1999 net earnings from self-employment?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: D

Choice 'd' is correct. Baum should report $281,750 as 1999 net earnings from self-employment (line 12 of the Form 1040), calculated as follows:

Choices 'a', 'b', and 'c' are incorrect. Self-employment tax and self-employment health insurance expenses are adjustments from total gross income. They are not deducted from self-employment earnings (i.e., not reported net on line 12 of the Form 1040).

Note: There are many distracters in this question, all relating to items that are either deductible as part of itemized deductions or not deductible. Be careful to read the requirement of the question before spending unnecessary time on the question. The statement that Baum's year-end inventory was not subject to the uniform capitalization rules is a distracter as well. There is not enough information given in the facts to apply the rules if he had been subject to them.


Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters

Currently there are no comments in this discussion, be the first to comment!


Save Cancel