Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

AICPA CPA-Financial Exam - Topic 3 Question 71 Discussion

Posted by Audra on Jul 09, 2023 at 06:09 AM

Adam Corp. had the following infrequent transactions during 1989:

* A $190,000 gain on reacquisition and retirement of bonds. This material event is also considered unusual for Adam Corp.

* A $260,000 gain on the disposal of a component of a business. Adam continues similar operations at another location.

* A $90,000 loss on the abandonment of equipment.

In its 1989 income statement, what amount should Adam report as total infrequent net gains that are not considered extraordinary?

Suggested Answer: D

Choice 'd' is correct. The concept of reliability in financial reporting includes; neutrality, representational faithfulness and verifiability.

Choices 'a', 'b', and 'c' are incorrect, per the above.


Get Premium CPA-Financial Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF Real Exam Format Detailed Explanations Instant Access Get Your Practice Test
44 comments · newest first
VE
Velda 11 months ago
Definitely $100,000 after all the adjustments!
RO
Roslyn 11 months ago
Really? I’m not sure about that calculation.
CH
Chauncey 11 months ago
I think it should be $170,000 after the loss.
DE
Deane 11 months ago
Wait, isn’t the loss on equipment supposed to be factored in?
LO
Loren 12 months ago
Total gains are $360,000 before the loss.
ON
Ona 12 months ago
I feel like the total should be the bond gain plus the disposal gain, but I’m not confident about how to handle the loss from the equipment.
JA
Jamal 12 months ago
The disposal gain seems straightforward, but I’m confused about how the abandonment loss affects the total. Should we subtract it from the gains?
TH
Thurman 1 year ago
I think we had a practice question similar to this one, and I remember that we only include gains that are not offset by losses.
MI
Mignon 1 year ago
I remember we discussed how to classify gains and losses, but I'm not sure if the bond gain counts as extraordinary since it's unusual.
ME
Merilyn 1 year ago
Ah, this is a good one. I remember learning about the different CloudGuard deployment methods in class. I'm pretty sure Terraform is one of the supported options, so I'll eliminate that. Now to figure out which of the remaining choices is not a valid method.
EL
Elouise 1 year ago
This is a great question! I'm pretty confident that the answer is Python, since it's a popular language for automation and scripting, and it integrates well with Docker.
JA
James 1 year ago
Okay, I think I've got this. Based on the information given, the Customer Success Manager seems like the most likely role to be accountable for developing and validating the Success Plan update. I'll go with that as my final answer.
JA
Jacob 1 year ago
Alright, time to put on my accountant hat. The question is pretty straightforward, but I can't help but feel like the answer is staring me in the face. Like, how could anyone get this wrong? Oh, wait, did I just say that out loud? Oops, my bad. Anyway, the answer is B) $170,000, and if you can't figure that out, you might want to consider a career change.
ER
Ernestine 1 year ago
↳ replying to Jacob
I'm not sure about this one, but I'll go with D) $450,000. It seems like the total infrequent net gains should be higher based on the transactions mentioned.
AN
Annmarie 1 year ago
↳ replying to Jacob
No, I disagree. I believe the correct answer is B) $170,000. The gain on reacquisition and retirement of bonds is the key here.
CA
Cassie 1 year ago
↳ replying to Jacob
I think the answer is C) $360,000. That gain on the disposal of a component of a business seems significant.
JO
Johnetta 1 year ago
Hmm, let me think about this. If the bond reacquisition gain is considered unusual, then we can't include that. But the business disposal gain and the equipment abandonment loss are both infrequent, so we add those together. That makes the answer B) $170,000. Wait, is that the right answer? I hope I'm not, like, totally off base here.
KE
Kenny 1 year ago
↳ replying to Johnetta
But remember, we're looking for the total infrequent net gains that are not considered extraordinary. So, the correct answer should be B) $170,000.
ER
Erin 1 year ago
↳ replying to Johnetta
Yeah, I agree. So, if we add the $260,000 gain on the disposal of a business component and the $90,000 loss on equipment abandonment, we get $350,000.
BO
Bok 1 year ago
↳ replying to Johnetta
Got it. So the total infrequent net gains that are not considered extraordinary for Adam Corp. in 1989 would be $170,000. That's the answer B).
DE
Delbert 1 year ago
↳ replying to Johnetta
Yeah, that's correct. So, we add the $260,000 gain on the disposal of a component of a business and the $90,000 loss on the abandonment of equipment to get $170,000.
YE
Yen 1 year ago
↳ replying to Johnetta
I think you're on the right track. We should exclude the bond reacquisition gain and just focus on the business disposal gain and equipment abandonment loss.
RE
Rebecka 1 year ago
↳ replying to Johnetta
I think you're on the right track. We should exclude the bond reacquisition gain and just focus on the business disposal gain and equipment abandonment loss.
AD
Adell 1 year ago
This is a tricky one, but I think I got it. The bond reacquisition gain is unusual, so we can't include that. But the business disposal gain and the equipment abandonment loss are both infrequent, so we add those together. That gives us B) $170,000. Easy peasy!
LE
Lettie 1 year ago
↳ replying to Adell
Great job! It's always important to carefully analyze each transaction.
TA
Tamie 1 year ago
↳ replying to Adell
Yes, that's correct. And that gives us a total of $170,000.
RO
Robt 1 year ago
↳ replying to Adell
So, we add the business disposal gain and the equipment abandonment loss, right?
AN
Antonette 1 year ago
↳ replying to Adell
I think you're right, we should exclude the bond reacquisition gain.
MA
Malissa 1 year ago
↳ replying to Adell
Great job! It's always important to carefully consider each transaction.
AL
Alfreda 1 year ago
↳ replying to Adell
Yes, that's correct. And that gives us a total of $170,000.
KI
Kimberlie 1 year ago
↳ replying to Adell
So, we add the business disposal gain and the equipment abandonment loss, right?
SH
Sharen 1 year ago
↳ replying to Adell
I think you're right, we should exclude the bond reacquisition gain.
JE
Jean 1 year ago
I'm leaning towards D) $450,000 because all the gains and losses should be considered.
TO
Torie 1 year ago
I disagree, I believe the answer is C) $360,000.
AN
Andree 1 year ago
I think the answer is B) $170,000.
EL
Ellen 1 year ago
I'm not sure, but I think the correct answer is D) $450,000.
LE
Leeann 1 year ago
I disagree, I believe the answer is C) $360,000.
DE
Denny 2 years ago
Wait, wait, wait. I'm pretty sure the question says the bond reacquisition gain is considered unusual, not just infrequent. That means we can't include it, right? I think the answer is A) $100,000.
MA
Markus 1 year ago
↳ replying to Denny
I agree, the answer should be A) $100,000.
TE
Teri 1 year ago
↳ replying to Denny
That would make the total infrequent net gains $100,000, which matches option A.
FI
Filiberto 1 year ago
↳ replying to Denny
So, we should only consider the gain on disposal of a component of a business and the loss on the abandonment of equipment.
JE
Jerilyn 1 year ago
↳ replying to Denny
I think you're right, we can't include the bond reacquisition gain since it's considered unusual.
EU
Eugene 2 years ago
I think the answer is B) $170,000.
GA
Gabriele 2 years ago
Hmm, let's see... The gains from the bond reacquisition and business disposal are infrequent but not extraordinary, and the loss from the equipment abandonment is also infrequent. So, we need to add the gains and subtract the loss to get the total infrequent net gains. Looks like the answer is B) $170,000.
0/2000 characters

Save Cancel