Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

AICPA CPA-Financial Exam - Topic 3 Question 56 Discussion

Posted by Mireya on Aug 03, 2022 at 08:45 AM

On January 2, 1993, Quo, Inc. hired Reed to be its controller. During the year, Reed, working closely with Quo's president and outside accountants, made changes in accounting policies, corrected several errors dating from 1992 and before, and instituted new accounting policies.

Quo's 1993 financial statements will be presented in comparative form with its 1992 financial statements.

This question represents one of Quo's transactions. List B represents the general accounting treatment required for these transactions. These treatments are:

* Cumulative effect approach - Include the cumulative effect of the adjustment resulting from the accounting change or error correction in the 1993 financial statements, and do not restate the 1992 financial statements.

* Retroactive or retrospective restatement approach - Restate the 1992 financial statements and adjust 1992 beginning retained earnings if the error or change affects a period prior to 1992.

* Prospective approach - Report 1993 and future financial statements on the new basis but do not restate 1992 financial statements.

Item to Be Answered

The equipment that Quo manufactures is sold with a five-year warranty. Because of a production breakthrough, Quo reduced its computation of warranty costs from 3% of sales to 1% of sales.

List B (Select one)

Suggested Answer: C

Choice 'C' is correct. This affects only the prospective (current and subsequent) periods - not prior periods, not retained earnings.


Get Premium CPA-Financial Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF Real Exam Format Detailed Explanations Instant Access Get Your Practice Test
13 comments · newest first
AY
Ayesha 11 months ago
Retroactive restatement could be necessary if it affects prior periods!
EL
Elena 11 months ago
Definitely the cumulative effect approach here, no need to restate 1992.
MA
Marsha 12 months ago
Wait, they can just change warranty costs like that? Seems odd.
AN
Anglea 12 months ago
I disagree, I think they should use the cumulative effect approach instead.
BE
Beatriz 12 months ago
Sounds like a classic case for the prospective approach.
MO
Mollie 1 year ago
I’m a bit lost on this one. Could it be cumulative? But then again, it seems like we’re just adjusting future estimates, so maybe it’s prospective?
JE
Jeniffer 1 year ago
I practiced a similar question where we had to decide on restatement versus prospective treatment. I think this one leans towards the prospective approach too.
MA
Margart 1 year ago
I’m not entirely sure, but I remember something about cumulative effects being used for changes that impact prior periods. This feels more like a future change though.
RE
Rebbecca 1 year ago
I think this might be a prospective approach since it’s about changing the estimate for future warranty costs, not correcting past errors.
JO
Joana 1 year ago
I've got a good feeling about option B. The key seems to be understanding the concept of "Network Slice isolation" and how that relates to resource and security.
HO
Honey 1 year ago
This looks like a pretty straightforward configuration question. I'd start by carefully reading through the details in the question and examining the exhibit to understand the context.
LU
Luis 1 year ago
Hmm, this seems straightforward. I'll start by carefully reading through the details about the organization-wide defaults and the user's profile permissions.
MU
Murray 1 year ago
I think I've got it! The accrued interest should be 1/12 of the annual coupon payment, which is $120. So the answer is $10.
0/2000 characters

Save Cancel