Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

AICPA CPA-Financial Exam - Topic 3 Question 126 Discussion

Posted by Rosenda on May 16, 2026 at 06:24 AM

Mellow Co. depreciated a $12,000 asset over five years, using the straight-line method with no salvage value. At the beginning of the fifth year, it was determined that the asset will last another four years. What amount should Mellow report as depreciation expense for year 5?

Suggested Answer: A

Choice 'a' is correct. Over the first 4 years, the asset would be depreciated down to $2,400. Once it was determined that the asset would last for another 4 years, $600 would be depreciated each year of that 4 year period. This change is a change in accounting estimate (the estimate being the life of the asset).

Changes is accounting estimate are accounted for in the current year and future years if the change affects both.

Choice 'b' is incorrect. This answer is the annual difference between the depreciation expense IF depreciation expense had been retroactively restated ($24,000 / 8 = $1,500) and the correct depreciation expense. Retroactive restatement is not appropriate for changes in accounting estimate.

Choice 'c' is incorrect. This answer is the depreciation expense IF depreciation had been retroactively restated ($24,000 / 8 = $1,500). Retroactive restatement is not appropriate for changes in accounting estimate.

Choice 'd' is incorrect. This answer is the undepreciated amount at the beginning of the fifth year or the amount of the annual depreciation expense for each of the first 4 years. Either way, it certainly is not going to be the depreciation expense for that year because the remaining cost will depreciated over the remaining period.


Get Premium CPA-Financial Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF Real Exam Format Detailed Explanations Instant Access Get Your Practice Test
22 comments · newest first
NO
Novella 2 days ago
I think it’s about recalculating depreciation.
AL
Alease 7 days ago
This question is tricky!
SH
Sharmaine 12 days ago
D) $2,400 is definitely not right.
BE
Bernadine 17 days ago
C) $1,500 seems too high for year 5.
TA
Tarra 22 days ago
I feel B) $900 makes sense.
GE
Gerry 28 days ago
Why A)? It’s already depreciated.
MA
Marvel 1 month ago
I think it's A) $600.
GE
Gertude 1 month ago
This question is tricky!
HU
Huey 1 month ago
Not sure about that, seems like a trick question.
ME
Melynda 2 months ago
Definitely $600, straight-line method is simple!
SA
Salena 2 months ago
Wait, how does extending the life change the expense?
AI
Aileen 2 months ago
I think it should be $1,500 for year 5.
DO
Donte 2 months ago
The original depreciation was $2,400 per year.
NO
Norah 2 months ago
Definitely $900, straight-line method is straightforward!
BR
Brock 2 months ago
I thought it would be $600, but I guess not!
LE
Lenny 3 months ago
Wait, how did they come up with that number?
MA
Mariko 3 months ago
Totally agree, it makes sense!
PE
Peggy 3 months ago
Depreciation expense for year 5 is $900.
JA
Javier 3 months ago
I’m a bit lost on how to handle the change in useful life. Does that mean we just take the total cost and divide it by the new total years?
DA
Darell 3 months ago
If I recall correctly, after four years, the asset would have been fully depreciated, so we need to spread the remaining value over the new four years.
WI
Wilda 4 months ago
I think the original depreciation was $2,400 per year, but since the asset's life was extended, we need to recalculate for the remaining years.
JO
Josephine 5 months ago
I remember that with straight-line depreciation, you divide the cost by the useful life, but I'm not sure how to adjust for the new lifespan.
0/2000 characters

Save Cancel