New Year Sale 2026! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

AICPA CPA-Financial Exam - Topic 2 Question 52 Discussion

Actual exam question for AICPA's CPA-Financial exam
Question #: 52
Topic #: 2
[All CPA-Financial Questions]

On January 2, 1993, Quo, Inc. hired Reed to be its controller. During the year, Reed, working closely with Quo's president and outside accountants, made changes in accounting policies, corrected several errors dating from 1992 and before, and instituted new accounting policies.

Quo's 1993 financial statements will be presented in comparative form with its 1992 financial statements.

This question represents one of Quo's transactions. List B represents the general accounting treatment required for these transactions. These treatments are:

* Cumulative effect approach - Include the cumulative effect of the adjustment resulting from the accounting change or error correction in the 1993 financial statements, and do not restate the 1992 financial statements.

* Retroactive or retrospective restatement approach - Restate the 1992 financial statements and adjust 1992 beginning retained earnings if the error or change affects a period prior to 1992.

* Prospective approach - Report 1993 and future financial statements on the new basis but do not restate 1992 financial statements.

Item to Be Answered

Quo changed from FIFO to average cost to account for its raw materials and work in process inventories.

List B (Select one)

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: B

Choice 'B' is correct. A change in accounting principle should be shown in the retained earnings statement of the earliest year presented as an adjustment of the beginning balance. All prior year financial statements are recast.


Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Madalyn
4 months ago
Prospective approach makes sense for future clarity!
upvoted 0 times
...
Chauncey
4 months ago
Wait, are they really not restating 1992? That seems off.
upvoted 0 times
...
Alesia
4 months ago
I think they should restate 1992 financials, though.
upvoted 0 times
...
Bea
4 months ago
Definitely a cumulative effect approach here!
upvoted 0 times
...
Graciela
4 months ago
Quo switched from FIFO to average cost for inventory.
upvoted 0 times
...
Mollie
5 months ago
I’m a bit lost on this one. I thought we always restated prior years, but maybe that’s only for certain types of changes?
upvoted 0 times
...
Dexter
5 months ago
I feel like the cumulative effect approach could be relevant, but I’m leaning towards the prospective approach since it mentions future financial statements.
upvoted 0 times
...
Theresia
5 months ago
This seems similar to a practice question we did about changing inventory methods. I think it might be the prospective approach since they’re not restating 1992.
upvoted 0 times
...
Devorah
5 months ago
I remember studying the different approaches for accounting changes, but I'm not entirely sure which one applies here.
upvoted 0 times
...
Justine
5 months ago
Hmm, I'm a little unsure about this one. The requirements around no login and no OAuth approval page seem a bit tricky. I'll need to carefully review the options to make sure I understand how each one addresses those needs.
upvoted 0 times
...
Keith
5 months ago
I'm a bit confused by the wording of the question. I'll need to re-read it a few times to make sure I understand what they're asking.
upvoted 0 times
...
Fernanda
5 months ago
I think my best strategy here is to carefully read through the options and try to eliminate any that don't seem relevant to the specific question about Huawei's disaster recovery setup. The key is to focus on the details of the question.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel