New Year Sale 2026! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

AICPA CPA-Financial Exam - Topic 1 Question 6 Discussion

Actual exam question for AICPA's CPA-Financial exam
Question #: 6
Topic #: 1
[All CPA-Financial Questions]

On January 2, 1993, Quo, Inc. hired Reed to be its controller. During the year, Reed, working closely with Quo's president and outside accountants, made changes in accounting policies, corrected several errors dating from 1992 and before, and instituted new accounting policies.

Quo's 1993 financial statements will be presented in comparative form with its 1992 financial statements.

This question represents one of Quo's transactions. List B represents the general accounting treatment required for these transactions. These treatments are:

* Cumulative effect approach - Include the cumulative effect of the adjustment resulting from the accounting change or error correction in the 1993 financial statements, and do not restate the 1992 financial statements.

* Retroactive or retrospective restatement approach - Restate the 1992 financial statements and adjust 1992 beginning retained earnings if the error or change affects a period prior to 1992.

* Prospective approach - Report 1993 and future financial statements on the new basis but do not restate 1992 financial statements.

During 1993, Quo increased its investment in Worth, Inc. from a 10% interest, purchased in 1992, to 30%, and acquired a seat on Worth's board of directors. As a result of its increased investment, Quo changed its method of accounting for investment in Worth, Inc. from the cost method to the equity method.

List B

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: B

Choice 'B' is correct. The equity method of accounting is applied retroactively when the investor has acquired 20% ownership. Prior to acquiring the ability to influence the investee, the cost method is proper. The retroactive restatement approach does not mean that this change is the correction of an error (which is now treated retroactively), a change in accounting principle (which is now treated retrospectively), or a change in accounting entity (which is now treated retrospectively). It just means that retroactive restatement is the proper treatment.


Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Edwin
4 months ago
I agree with Joe, cumulative effect is simpler for this case.
upvoted 0 times
...
Alease
4 months ago
Definitely a prospective approach for future statements!
upvoted 0 times
...
Vannessa
4 months ago
Wait, so they’re not changing 1992 at all? That seems odd.
upvoted 0 times
...
Sanda
4 months ago
I think they should restate 1992, makes more sense!
upvoted 0 times
...
Filiberto
5 months ago
Cumulative effect approach is the way to go here.
upvoted 0 times
...
Filiberto
5 months ago
Based on my experience, the correct answer here is B. The question is asking which representation should not be included, and the fact that there are no significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal control is the only one that would not need to be reported.
upvoted 0 times
...
Yuette
5 months ago
Okay, I've got this. The cost of quality is about the total costs associated with ensuring a quality product, not just the customer satisfaction or leftover materials. I'll go with option C.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel