Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

AICPA CPA-Business Exam - Topic 3 Question 83 Discussion

Posted by Harrison on Mar 16, 2024 at 08:48 AM

Companies that adopt just-in-time purchasing systems often experience:

Suggested Answer: C

Choice 'c' is correct.

Choices 'a', 'b', and 'd' are incorrect, per the above calculation.


Get Premium CPA-Business Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF Real Exam Format Detailed Explanations Instant Access Get Your Practice Test
40 comments · newest first
LA
Lavina 10 months ago
Fewer deliveries? That's a game changer!
RO
Rodolfo 11 months ago
Wait, less need for vendor systems? That sounds off.
ST
Stefan 11 months ago
Actually, it might lead to more inspections, right?
MO
Mozell 11 months ago
I agree, it streamlines the process!
EL
Elise 11 months ago
Just-in-time means fewer suppliers for sure.
DE
Desiree 12 months ago
I don't think there's less need for linkage with a vendor's system; in fact, it seems like it would be more important to ensure timely deliveries.
HE
Heike 12 months ago
I feel like there was something about needing more inspections with just-in-time systems, but I can't recall the details.
JO
Jose 12 months ago
I remember practicing a question about supplier relationships, and I think reducing the number of suppliers can be a strategy with just-in-time purchasing.
KI
Kirk 1 year ago
I think just-in-time systems might lead to fewer deliveries, but I'm not entirely sure. It seems like they would want to consolidate shipments.
SO
Solange 1 year ago
I'm pretty confident the answer is C. Just-in-time means less buffer stock, so companies would need to inspect goods more closely as they arrive to ensure quality.
AV
Avery 1 year ago
Okay, I've got this. Just-in-time systems aim to minimize inventory, so companies would likely need more frequent deliveries from a smaller number of suppliers. I'll go with option B.
FR
Franchesca 1 year ago
Hmm, I'm a bit unsure about this one. I know just-in-time is about reducing inventory, but I'm not sure which specific outcome it leads to. I'll have to review my notes.
TO
Tomoko 1 year ago
This seems like a straightforward question about just-in-time purchasing systems. I'll need to think through the key characteristics of this approach.
TR
Tracey 1 year ago
I've got this one! The answer is definitely D. The dispersed nature of the attack, the need to trace back to the masters and originating machine, and the lack of common attributes among the attackers - it all makes tracebacks extremely difficult in a DDoS scenario.
EL
Elina 1 year ago
The Rich Text Area is definitely the way to go here. It gives users the flexibility to add all the details, formatting, and media that the requirement calls for.
VA
Van 1 year ago
I've got this! The custodian is responsible for determining classification levels, controlling access, and performing data restoration. Easy peasy.
GR
Graciela 1 year ago
I'm a little confused by this question. I know EFS can be tricky to optimize, but I'm not sure if any of these options are the best approach. I'll need to review my notes on EFS performance tuning to make sure I choose the right answer.
NA
Naomi 1 year ago
Just-in-time, just-in-time, what a rhyme! But the right answer is definitely C, more inspection needed.
YE
Yen 1 year ago
↳ replying to Naomi
C) A greater need for inspection of goods as the goods arrive.
SY
Sylvie 1 year ago
↳ replying to Naomi
B) Fewer deliveries from suppliers.
CA
Carman 1 year ago
↳ replying to Naomi
A) A reduction in the number of suppliers.
BR
Brittni 1 year ago
D seems like the odd one out here. Less need for vendor integration? I don't think so!
BO
Bok 1 year ago
↳ replying to Brittni
C) A greater need for inspection of goods as the goods arrive.
TA
Tasia 1 year ago
↳ replying to Brittni
B) Fewer deliveries from suppliers.
SH
Shawn 1 year ago
↳ replying to Brittni
A) A reduction in the number of suppliers.
LA
Latanya 1 year ago
I'm leaning towards A. Reducing the number of suppliers is a common strategy with just-in-time systems.
RO
Rosalind 1 year ago
↳ replying to Latanya
B) Fewer deliveries from suppliers.
LE
Levi 1 year ago
↳ replying to Latanya
I agree, having fewer suppliers can help streamline the process.
PR
Providencia 1 year ago
↳ replying to Latanya
A) A reduction in the number of suppliers.
NO
Noelia 1 year ago
I'm pretty sure the answer is B. Fewer deliveries from suppliers is a key characteristic of just-in-time purchasing.
LO
Louann 1 year ago
Hmm, I think the correct answer is C. With just-in-time systems, the need for inspection is greater as goods arrive less frequently.
WI
Willow 1 year ago
↳ replying to Louann
Yes, it's all about efficiency and quality control in these systems.
AD
Adaline 1 year ago
↳ replying to Louann
Actually, the correct answer is B. Fewer deliveries mean less need for inspection.
DA
Dalene 1 year ago
↳ replying to Louann
That makes sense, it's important to ensure the quality of goods with just-in-time systems.
HY
Hyman 1 year ago
↳ replying to Louann
I agree, having fewer deliveries means each delivery is more critical to inspect.
MI
Mica 1 year ago
↳ replying to Louann
I think the correct answer is C. With just-in-time systems, the need for inspection is greater as goods arrive less frequently.
VI
Viva 1 year ago
↳ replying to Louann
I agree, with just-in-time systems, inspection becomes more crucial.
MA
Martin 2 years ago
But doesn't that also mean a greater need for inspection of goods as they arrive to ensure quality and avoid disruptions in production?
LA
Laura 2 years ago
I agree with Shayne. With just-in-time systems, companies aim to reduce inventory and have goods delivered only when needed.
SH
Shayne 2 years ago
I think companies that adopt just-in-time purchasing systems often experience fewer deliveries from suppliers.
0/2000 characters

Save Cancel