New Year Sale 2026! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

AICPA CPA-Business Exam - Topic 2 Question 87 Discussion

Actual exam question for AICPA's CPA-Business exam
Question #: 87
Topic #: 2
[All CPA-Business Questions]

Patents are granted in order to encourage firms to invest in the research and development of new products. Patents are an example of:

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: A

Choice 'a' is correct. 7.0 percent cost of funds from retained earnings.

The cost of retained earnings is equal to the rate of return required by the firm's common shareholders (or, in effect, the return 'lost' by them when the firm chooses to fund with retained earnings). While oftentimes this rate is somewhat subjective, we are given the facts to exactly answer the question in this case. The stock is currently selling for $100/share, and the dividend is given at $7/share.

$7 / $100 = 7%

Choices 'b', 'c', and 'd' are incorrect, per the above Explanation:/calculation.


Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Gwenn
3 months ago
I thought collusion was the main issue here, not patents.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ashton
3 months ago
Wait, are patents really just about protecting ideas?
upvoted 0 times
...
Irving
3 months ago
Totally agree, they create exclusionary practices!
upvoted 0 times
...
Emilio
4 months ago
I think they're more about entry barriers.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lawrence
4 months ago
Patents definitely encourage R&D investment.
upvoted 0 times
...
Glory
4 months ago
I thought collusion was more about companies working together, not about patents. This is tricky!
upvoted 0 times
...
Candra
4 months ago
I practiced a question about market concentration and patents, but I feel like entry barriers make more sense here.
upvoted 0 times
...
Moon
4 months ago
I'm not entirely sure, but I remember something about exclusionary practices being linked to patents. Could that be right?
upvoted 0 times
...
Reid
5 months ago
I think patents might relate to entry barriers since they prevent others from making the same product for a while.
upvoted 0 times
...
Leonor
5 months ago
I'm a bit confused by this question. The options don't seem to directly match the explanation about patents encouraging R&D. I'll have to re-read the question and think about how patents relate to market competition. Hopefully I can eliminate a couple options and make an educated guess.
upvoted 0 times
...
Franklyn
5 months ago
Okay, let me see. Patents are meant to incentivize R&D, so I think the right answer has to be something about encouraging investment in new products. I'm leaning towards B, "entry barriers," since that seems to capture the idea of protecting the firm's position in the market.
upvoted 0 times
...
Janna
5 months ago
Hmm, I'm not totally sure about this one. I know patents have something to do with encouraging new products, but I'm not sure if that's the same as "entry barriers." I'll have to think this through carefully.
upvoted 0 times
...
Taryn
5 months ago
This seems like a straightforward question about the purpose of patents. I'm pretty confident I know the answer - patents are a way to encourage innovation by giving firms a temporary monopoly.
upvoted 0 times
...
Marsha
5 months ago
Hmm, this seems straightforward. I think I'll go with option B and install the Connected Machine agent on the on-premises computers.
upvoted 0 times
...
Arlene
5 months ago
Ugh, I'm drawing a blank on this one. I'll have to come back to it and see if I can eliminate some of the options.
upvoted 0 times
...
Amber
5 months ago
Hmm, I'm a little unsure about this one. The question is asking about who is responsible for coding patient charts, but I'm not totally clear on the differences between the roles listed. I'll have to think this through carefully.
upvoted 0 times
...
Paola
9 months ago
Alright, time to channel my inner patent attorney. I'm feeling confident about B - those entry barriers ain't gonna build themselves!
upvoted 0 times
...
Elena
9 months ago
Patents, huh? I wonder if they have one for making really good coffee. That's the kind of innovation I can get behind!
upvoted 0 times
...
Elouise
10 months ago
Hold up, is this a trick question? Aren't patents the opposite of collusion? I'm going with C.
upvoted 0 times
Layla
8 months ago
C) Exclusionary practices.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lili
9 months ago
B) Entry barriers.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jolene
9 months ago
A) Market concentration.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Allene
10 months ago
I'm not sure, but I think patents are supposed to encourage innovation, so option A might be the correct answer.
upvoted 0 times
Ettie
8 months ago
So, the answer would be market concentration, right?
upvoted 0 times
...
Gabriele
8 months ago
Yes, that's correct. It's to promote innovation and new product development.
upvoted 0 times
...
Viva
9 months ago
I think patents are granted to encourage firms to invest in research and development.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Madalyn
10 months ago
Option B seems like the right answer here. Patents definitely create barriers to entry for new firms.
upvoted 0 times
Dorothy
9 months ago
That's true, patents give the firm exclusive rights to their product.
upvoted 0 times
...
Nan
10 months ago
I agree, patents make it harder for new firms to enter the market.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Barney
11 months ago
But doesn't granting patents also lead to market concentration as only the patent holder can produce the product?
upvoted 0 times
...
Patrick
11 months ago
I agree with Vallie, patents encourage firms to invest in R&D by providing them with exclusive rights.
upvoted 0 times
...
Vallie
11 months ago
I think patents are an example of entry barriers.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel